-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 24 August 2003 12:18, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:36:30PM +0300, Erez Doron wrote:
> > > i installed kernel-source-2.4.20-20.9-i686.rpm
> > > i linked the main dir to /us
On Sunday 24 August 2003 19:45, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hope this explains things,
>
> Yes, G, thanks for the enlightenment. My point stands though: all
> other sins aside the compiled portion of the code should not assume a
> particular path to wha
Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hope this explains things,
Yes, G, thanks for the enlightenment. My point stands though: all
other sins aside the compiled portion of the code should not assume a
particular path to what it needs. I can only surmise that they had
technical reasons t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 24 August 2003 14:43, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Alex Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thats not always true, for example in Gentoo if you choose to
> > compile a NPTL enabled glibc /usr/src/linux MUST point to a recent
> > 2.6 kernel tree
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
I don't follow the point about binary drivers compiled against headers
in /usr/src/linux. I must admit I have avoided binary-only drivers for
now, but what do they care if I have the right directory if they are
binary already? As long as I am using exactly the same kernel as
Alex Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thats not always true, for example in Gentoo if you choose to
> compile a NPTL enabled glibc /usr/src/linux MUST point to a recent
> 2.6 kernel tree, also the nvidia binary driver compiles against
> headers from /usr/src/linux, basically this done so you ca
well,
mrproper fixed it, thanks.
btw, there was no /usr/src/linux to begin with, and /usr/src/linux-2.4
was created by the kernel-source rpm
thanks,
erez.
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:36:30PM +0300, Erez Doron wrote:
i
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:56:39PM +, Alex Veber wrote:
> > > /usr/src/linux should point to the headers glibc was compiled
> > > against. You shouldn't touch it unless you really know what you're
> > > doing.
> >
> > Muli, I think you are confusing it with /usr/include/linux. Linux
> > stoppe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 24 August 2003 12:18, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:36:30PM +0300, Erez Doron wrote:
> > > i installed kernel-source-2.4.20-20.9-i686.rpm
> > > i linked the main dir to /us
Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:36:30PM +0300, Erez Doron wrote:
>
> > i installed kernel-source-2.4.20-20.9-i686.rpm
> > i linked the main dir to /usr/src/linux ( was already linked to
> > /usr/src/linux-2.4)
And what is /usr/src/linux-2.4? Maybe that w
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:36:30PM +0300, Erez Doron wrote:
> i installed kernel-source-2.4.20-20.9-i686.rpm
> i linked the main dir to /usr/src/linux ( was already linked to
> /usr/src/linux-2.4)
/usr/src/linux should point to the headers glibc was compiled
against. You shouldn't touch it unles
hi
system: redhat 9.0 fully upgraded.
the kernel source i downloaded should cleanly compile as it is used in
the redhat binary rpm, but it is not (see below):
i installed kernel-source-2.4.20-20.9-i686.rpm
i linked the main dir to /usr/src/linux ( was already linked to
/usr/src/linux-2.4)
i did
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Or Sagi wrote:
Or, again, it would be nice if you could either post a constructive
criticism, or no post at all (and this goes for everyone). No need to use
this kind of attitude and language on a public list. Although the guy made
a mistake, cutting his throat off is not the
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
In fact, as and as86 are *not* the same:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 155644 Oct 14 1998 /usr/bin/as
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root47996 May 5 1998 /usr/bin/as86
--Ariel
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Mike wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> > I'm installi
Ok, but instead to insult ppl you could simply ask nice.
I don't think that my question was out off line, i tried to search deja.com and
other places but maybe i am a clueless idiot as written here.
BTW - i did used the Kernel-HOWTO. and even red it several times and made a hard
copy of it. but
To all you BAMS who flame to the list:
STOP! you want to flame ? do that in private.
At this (Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 02:05:11PM +0200) day, Or Sagi wrote:
| On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Mike wrote:
|
| > Hi.
|
|
|
| > why did it occour ?
|
| Because you're a clueless idiot ?
|
| Do you even _bother_
Option 1:
Probably you didn't install the as86. In my RedHat 6.0 it's in the
package
bin86.
"The bin86 package provides an assembler and linker for real mode 80x86
instructions. You'll need to have this package installed in order to
build programs that run in real mode, including LILO and the ke
Thanks :-))
Worked like a charm.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Ury Segal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Linux-il <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: new kernel compiling error
> Option 1:
>
>
Or Sagi wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Mike wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
>
>
> > why did it occour ?
>
> Because you're a clueless idiot ?
Hello, guys. We are supposed to be nice people. You know, linux
comunity,etc. If his mail bother you ( and Alex shnitman ) , you
don't have to reply. If the man bothers
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Mike wrote:
> Hi.
> why did it occour ?
Because you're a clueless idiot ?
Do you even _bother_ to try and find out the answer yourself before you
rush and post your yet-another-whine about why things don't work for you ?
Some people shouldn't be allowed to use computers
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Mike wrote:
>I'm installing linux-2.2.12 kernel.
>in the make bzImage (or make zImage) i get the following error :
>make[1]: as86: Command not found
>make[1]: *** [bbootsect.o] Error 127
>make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux/arch
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Mike wrote:
> Hi.
> I'm installing linux-2.2.12 kernel.
> in the make bzImage (or make zImage) i get the following error :
> make[1]: as86: Command not found
> make[1]: *** [bbootsect.o] Error 127
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot'
> make: *** [bzImag
Hi.
I'm installing linux-2.2.12 kernel.
in the make bzImage (or make zImage) i get the
following error :
make[1]: as86: Command not found
make[1]: *** [bbootsect.o] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot'
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
What do i need to do in order
23 matches
Mail list logo
