Hi everyone,
I noticed that in the last few days the question of the proper MTU for
ADSL connections was raised, with some remarks about corrections/additions
to the HOWTO .
so:
1) We plan to rewrite the HOWTO, so we will take the remarks into
consideration.
2) the current version of the howto has
guy keren wrote:
>On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Ira Abramov wrote:
>
>3. it _could_ be that even without it, the mere fact that ira uses
> 're-fragmentation' (which, as i remember, was a requirement for any
> masquerading linux machine, back in 2.2 kernels - have that changed)
> would have caused a
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Eli Marmor wrote:
> So I guess the rule that Ira and Tzahi suggested, is the solution, and
Oh yeah... my rules rulez, as a rule.
I rule! Kneel before Zod!
|)0|\|7 /\/\355 \/\/1|O /\/\'/ /\/\4|) 5|<1llz
..Man, I work too much.
--
(@-Please do NOT cc: me answers post
guy keren wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Ira Abramov wrote:
>
> > personally, my MTU is set at 1452, and also forced to re-fragment in the
> > iptables:
> >
> > $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu
> >
> > no idea if it helps, but it doesn't hurt :)
>
09, 2002 2:41 PM
To: Ira Abramov
Cc: IGLU
Subject: Re: Solved: https(443) and ADSL/masquerading
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Ira Abramov wrote:
> personally, my MTU is set at 1452, and also forced to re-fragment in the
> iptables:
>
> $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j T
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Ira Abramov wrote:
> personally, my MTU is set at 1452, and also forced to re-fragment in the
> iptables:
>
> $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu
>
> no idea if it helps, but it doesn't hurt :)
lets try to guestimate why this is
Ira Abramov wrote:
>personally, my MTU is set at 1452, and also forced to re-fragment in the
>iptables:
>
>$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu
>
>no idea if it helps, but it doesn't hurt :)
>
>
Actually, this does not refragment, but rather changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Eli Marmor wrote:
> 4. WTF is MTU?!
> 5. ADSL sucks!
> 6. Bezeq sucks!
> 7. Kvar Taramti BaAvoda (I already donated in the office).
8. Cowboy Neal
personally, my MTU is set at 1452, and also forced to re-fragment in the
iptable
Noam Meltzer wrote:
> when i just connected to adsl about half a year ago, i tried to work
> like the manual said, but it made me problems fetching mails with pop3
> from internet zahav. when i tried to put the mtu to 1500 it solved the
> problem. never changed it since then and everything works
when i just connected to adsl about half a year ago, i tried to work
like the manual said, but it made me problems fetching mails with pop3
from internet zahav. when i tried to put the mtu to 1500 it solved the
problem. never changed it since then and everything works great.
Noam
On Tue, 2002-01
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Eli Marmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>After zillion things that I've tried, I decided to set the MTU to 1500,
>>*CONTRARY* to what the howto says (1452).
>>Surprisingly, it resolved everything, and now it's working like crazy.
>>
>
> How interesting. My experien
Dani Arbel wrote:
> Did you change the ppp mtu to 1500 ?
This is the exact step I took:
I have a "pptp" command running from /etc/init.d/pptpadsl under Devil-
Linux (this file was contributed recently to the CVS by me). Among
other flags, this command has the following:
mtu "$PPTPADSL_M
Eli,
Did you change the ppp mtu to 1500 ?
can you sho the ifconfig of both configurations?
did you use the adjust mtu flag in your NAT rules?
Dani
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Eli Marmor wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > Before I'm digging into the problem:
> >
> > Has anybody experienced difficulties with https c
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
>
> Eli Marmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > After zillion things that I've tried, I decided to set the MTU to 1500,
> > *CONTRARY* to what the howto says (1452).
> > Surprisingly, it resolved everything, and now it's working like crazy.
>
> How interesting. My experi
Eli Marmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After zillion things that I've tried, I decided to set the MTU to 1500,
> *CONTRARY* to what the howto says (1452).
> Surprisingly, it resolved everything, and now it's working like crazy.
How interesting. My experience agrees with the HOWTO, e.g. I recal
I wrote:
> Before I'm digging into the problem:
>
> Has anybody experienced difficulties with https connections, using ADSL
> Linux router?
>
> I have a Linux router that is connected on its one side to ADSL modem,
> and on its second side - to a WinME machine. Everything works on the
> WinME,
A correction: I found one https site that was accessed flawlessly:
https://www.boutell.com/
However, most https sites could not be accessed, including the banks
(e.g. https://www.umb.co.il/ and https://hb2.bankleumi.co.il/ ) and
many others (even static ones, like https://www.covalent.com/ ).
An
Ira Abramov wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Eli Marmor wrote:
>
> > Has anybody experienced difficulties with https connections, using ADSL
> > Linux router?
>
> nope, works great from where I'm sitting. maybe a bad proxy config?
>
> is it one site or a few different ones?
It occures with all th
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Eli Marmor wrote:
> Has anybody experienced difficulties with https connections, using ADSL
> Linux router?
nope, works great from where I'm sitting. maybe a bad proxy config?
is it one site or a few different ones?
--
(@-Please do NOT cc: me answers posted also to the
Before I'm digging into the problem:
Has anybody experienced difficulties with https connections, using ADSL
Linux router?
I have a Linux router that is connected on its one side to ADSL modem,
and on its second side - to a WinME machine. Everything works on the
WinME, except for https: Whenever
20 matches
Mail list logo
