Hi, dgi_il!
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:44:45PM -, you wrote the following:
> 1) Sorry about the double posting on linmodems.
>
> 2) I have one subscription to this mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED], how the
> server let [EMAIL PROTECTED] into here also?
It didn't -- i
1) Sorry about the double posting on linmodems.
2) I have one subscription to this mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED], how the
server let [EMAIL PROTECTED] into here also?
- diego
(BTW: did you hear surfree is dead..)
=
To
hi list,
any idea what might cause a mail server (sendmail) to post each message
twice to a mailbox ?
I've been getting almost every mail (from different senders of course)
twice.
any thought's ?
_|_|_ Best Regard's ,
( ) * Amir Tal,
/v\ / System
nope.
I don't really see the point why not though..
alex?:)
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On 31 Jan 2000, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
| Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > - master lists that spread to two or more ohers without dups
| > - announcement lis
Hi, Oleg Goldshmidt!
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 12:08:04PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> > - master lists that spread to two or more ohers without dups
> > - announcement lists (and we have linux-il-announce, are you all
> > subscribed? I'm resending the details of this Friday's IGLU meeting)
>
On 31 Jan 2000, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> We are supposed to be subscribed. IIRC, the announce list was set up
> in such a way that everybody on linux-il was subscribed automatically.
> Will the admin please confirm?
I wasn't here when it happend, I understand Vadik created it with a
snapshot of
> benefits of the move). Later the idea of having two lists materialized
> somehow (I am not sure how, but I have the impression that it happened
> after the iglu subscriber count turned out less than impressive). I
Nope. It materialized during our virtual IRC meeting.
Thanks,
Chen Shapira
I
Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Iglu didn't even START working. like maddog keeps telling people who
> want to start LUGs and make activities happen: slowly slowly. don't
> expect everything overnight. let things shape themselves. I can't
> imagine on what grounds you have already set s
Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - master lists that spread to two or more ohers without dups
> - announcement lists (and we have linux-il-announce, are you all
> subscribed? I'm resending the details of this Friday's IGLU meeting)
We are supposed to be subscribed. IIRC, the announce li
On 31 Jan 2000, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> threads. What were the words in the kernel documentation: Let's all
> kill this beast [IGLU in this case]?
> 1) Currently I am subscribed to both lists. I think I was one of the
>first IGLU subscribers because I thought we should give it a fair
>t
aps for the random fact that some people happen to be reading
> both of them - and that's true for any two mailing lists.
>
> > I think that a new mailing list will only cause more confusion, *much*
> > double posting, and having to read both, which is why I don't
appen to be reading
both of them - and that's true for any two mailing lists.
> I think that a new mailing list will only cause more confusion, *much*
> double posting, and having to read both, which is why I don't like the idea.
> That is unless they have *really* different ag
Hi, Nadav Har'El!
On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 08:05:00PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> How many people are on linux-il - 500? (I'm just guessing - it would
> be nice to get an official figure!)
There are 319 people subscribed, excluding the ones marked VACATION
(20 of them).
--
Alex Shnitman
On Sun, Jan 30, 2000, Ira Abramov wrote about "Re: [iglu] Double posting to iglu and
linux-il?":
> the only double-post in the last 3-4 days was the above question. IGLU
> is defining itself as it goes along. Hopefully it is becoming the home
> for the LUG activities, activ
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Since receiving double postings is somewhat annoying, are there any guide
> lines about double posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
>
> If it was up to me then I would accept such double posts until most of us will
> lear
Since receiving double postings is somewhat annoying, are there any guide
lines about double posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
If it was up to me then I would accept such double posts until most of us will
learn by experience when to double post (perhaps not at all) and when
16 matches
Mail list logo
