Quoting Ilya Konstantinov, from the post of Sun, 05 Dec:
> Ira Abramov wrote:
>
> >and there are many uncommon ones. Canon cameras usualy have their own
> >(incompatible one) that requires a separate driver,
> >
> Ouch, still? I remember it was the case for Canon PowerShot S40...
All Canons I ha
Ira Abramov wrote:
and there are many uncommon ones. Canon cameras usualy have their own
(incompatible one) that requires a separate driver,
Ouch, still? I remember it was the case for Canon PowerShot S40...
GPhoto supported its proprietary protocol, though.
or WIA (which is the microsoft equivel
Quoting Ilya Konstantinov, from the post of Sun, 05 Dec:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 07:39:09AM +0200, Kovriga, Gregory wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Some bits of info:
> > I have A80 (I assume the interface should be the same for A85) - it
> > doesn't work directly, you can't mount it. BTW: as far as I know t
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 07:39:09AM +0200, Kovriga, Gregory wrote:
> Hi,
> Some bits of info:
> I have A80 (I assume the interface should be the same for A85) - it
> doesn't work directly, you can't mount it. BTW: as far as I know the
> same is with Windows - you need to install a driver to use it.
ly embedded into
the camera (whereas in A80 it can be turned in almost any direction).
Thanks,
Gregory.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noam Meltzer
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 12:34 AM
To: Linux-IL mailing list
Subject: conclusion :-)
Well,
10x for those who answered.
It seems like I have no worries about linux support if I buy that camera.
Seems like unlike their printers, Canon's digital cameras has no problem
working with linux.
--
Noam Meltzer
pgpQA3oaMdSyn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
