.
HTH,
Eliyahu - אליהו
2014-11-24 16:27 GMT+02:00 Amichai Rotman :
> Can any of you recommend an off-the-shelf ADSL modem/router I can install
> OpenWRT on?
>
> My current router is a Netgear DGN2200 by Bezezeq.
>
> Thanks!
>
Can any of you recommend an off-the-shelf ADSL modem/router I can install
OpenWRT on?
My current router is a Netgear DGN2200 by Bezezeq.
Thanks!
Amichai
Sent from my Galaxy S3
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http
On Sep 16, 2009, at 6:21 PM, shlomo solomon wrote:
This has been discussed before, but not recently and things do
change over
time. So, I'd like to hear opinions.
I've have both, a 2.5m aDSL line and a 5m HOT line. The aDSL line uses
012 as my ISP, the HOT line as Netvision
This has been discussed before, but not recently and things do change over
time. So, I'd like to hear opinions.
Is there any technical reason not to make the move? I've been on ADSL since
the beginning of the service. At the moment I have a Bezeq supplied Siemens
SL2-141 Modem/R
if so, please send me your adsl config
thanks,
erez.
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
Shlomi Fish wrote:
I tried reducing it to 1,400 and the FF problem persisted. Now I'm trying to
reduce it to 1,300 and see how it goes.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
When I had such problems (a few years back) the solution was to disable
ipv6 (as in, blacklist the ipv6
Hi Shimi!
On Monday 06 April 2009 16:48:04 shimi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Until recently, everything was nice and dandy, but starting from a few
> > weeks
> > ago (about two months I think) Firefox started to report something like
> > "The
> > connection was
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> Until recently, everything was nice and dandy, but starting from a few
> weeks
> ago (about two months I think) Firefox started to report something like
> "The
> connection was interrupted why loading the page. Press the button to try
> again
Hi all!
Recently I've been having some networking problems on my Linux workstation. My
Linux workstation, as well as my family's Windows XP machines are connected to
the Internet using an Ethernet+wireless NAT/Router ( AirLink 101) that's
connected to our Bezeq ADSL (WOW) ECI
; HOT. I
> > > would just have to unplug the ADSL line and plug the HOT modem into one
> > > of the ethernet ports on the router. Am I correct?
> >
> > If you could fit a RJ-45 plug into a RJ-11 socket... (and even if you had
> > an adapter, the unit expect
bought one at Office Depot and I hooked it up for her to aDSL,
and it took about 2 minutes to configure. Most of the time was choosing
the WiFi passwords.
If you can find one at what you consider a reasonable price, buy a
Linksys WRTG-54L, which is the model that can run Linux. You can use it
out of
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 10:20:22PM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> On Thursday 09 October 2008, shimi wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > > My assumption is that I could still use the same router after moving to
> > > HOT. I
> > >
On Friday 10 October 2008, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> The usual routers only have one ethernet port on the LAN side, not 4.
> It is connected to an internal 5 port hub, so you get 4 LAN ports to
> plug things into, but the router part only sees one port.
OK - so assuming I can't use the router
On Thursday 09 October 2008, shimi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > My assumption is that I could still use the same router after moving to
> > HOT. I
> > would just have to unplug the ADSL line and plug the HOT modem into one
> > o
Shlomo Solomon wrote:
My assumption is that I could still use the same router after moving to HOT. I
would just have to unplug the ADSL line and plug the HOT modem into one of
the ethernet ports on the router. Am I correct?
well if you want to still use the router as a router, I'd think
m using
> > normal IP-over-Ethernet to connect to the Internet (with somewhat lower
> > MTU).
>
> Since in my case (still using ADSL), my router is also ADSL capable and has
> a
> built-in firewall (I think most routers do), all the machines on my network
> connect to ethernet
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:23:23AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I have lots of problems with Hot disconnecting and very high latency.
Hot blames Nezeq Beinleimi, Nezek blames Hot. I personally believe
that Nezeq is to blame for the latency, but Hot is to blame for the
_hours_ of downtime every month
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 10:20:22PM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
Now I'm confused. Firstly, I certainly don't expect to plug the HOT modem into
the ADSL plug. As I already wrote (see quote above), I thought I could plug
the HOT modem into one of the ethernet ports. I may be missing
2008/10/9 Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Now I'm confused. Firstly, I certainly don't expect to plug the HOT modem into
> the ADSL plug. As I already wrote (see quote above), I thought I could plug
> the HOT modem into one of the ethernet ports. I may be missing
2008/10/8 Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm thinking of moving from ADSL to HOT (Cable). I wanted to know 2 things:
>
> 1 - Since today I have an ADSL router (bought from Bezek), I no longer use
> pptp, NAT or any other Linux tools to connect to the Internet. T
Since in my case (still using ADSL), my router is also ADSL capable and has a
built-in firewall (I think most routers do), all the machines on my network
connect to ethernet ports on the router - no single computer is actually
connected directly to the Internet.
My assumption is that I could still us
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:41:48PM +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Do remember that unlike PPTP/L2TP, as far as my firewall is concerned
(which connects directly over Ethernet to the HOT modem), I'm using
normal IP-over-Ethernet to connect to the Internet (with somewhat lower
MTU).
You are a very
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:03 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> First of all, you do not want to use DHCP. The actual name of what is hapening
> is called MPLS and it to be blunt sucks. The extra overhead of a pptp or
> more likely l2tp tunnel is IMHO worth it, although if you are at the edge
> o
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 21:36 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:03 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> > First of all, you do not want to use DHCP. The actual name of what is
> > hapening
> > is called MPLS and it to be blunt sucks. The extra overhead of a pptp or
> > more lik
astructure.
Thanks for the long, informative post, but in my case, your various
suggestions are really overkill. If I make the move, it will be to replace
ADSL and a Bezeq land-line (not more than about 600 minutes a month). When I
do call overseas, I use Jajah, which is more than enough for my
er you use DHCP on your side is up to you.
As mentioned before, I bought the router from Bezeq, so it should be OK. It's
a Siemens SL2-141)
Don't know, anyone else?
I don't know what "lots of P2P" means, but I don't do much and haven't noticed
any problems wi
Siemens SL2-141)
> The biggest problem you will have is that the router does not have enough
> RAM for big routing tables, so if you do lots of P2P, it will have
> problems.
I don't know what "lots of P2P" means, but I don't do much and haven't noticed
any proble
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 11:03:25AM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
As for reliability, service and speed, the best thing to do is to call
HOT and ask for their business internet sales office. They offer higher
speeds, better reliabilty and they will come and fix problems a lot better
and a
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:20:58AM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
Thanks, but maybe my question wasn't clear enough. In the past, I did pptp and
NAT on my Linux box and shared my internet connection over the entire
network. Since I bought an ADSL router from Bezek, everything is
literaly
inux box and shared my internet connection over the entire
> network. Since I bought an ADSL router from Bezek, everything is
> literaly "plug and play" on all Linux and Windows machines. I have the
> router
> set up to provide internal IP addresses to each machine and absol
AT on my Linux box and shared my internet connection over the entire
network. Since I bought an ADSL router from Bezek, everything is
literaly "plug and play" on all Linux and Windows machines. I have the router
set up to provide internal IP addresses to each machine and absolutely
ice. Their infrastructure might be better, but
when it is untreated it is much more unreliable. See one example
http://www.warning.org.il and
http://www.tluna.co.il/companies/company.asp?CompanyID=128
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I'm thin
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 05:41 +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> I'm thinking of moving from ADSL to HOT (Cable). I wanted to know 2 things:
>
> 1 - Since today I have an ADSL router (bought from Bezek), I no longer use
> pptp, NAT or any other Linux tools to connect to the Intern
I'm thinking of moving from ADSL to HOT (Cable). I wanted to know 2 things:
1 - Since today I have an ADSL router (bought from Bezek), I no longer use
pptp, NAT or any other Linux tools to connect to the Internet. The router is
the only "computer" connected and all my Linux box
Michael Ben-Gershon wrote:
Lior Okman wrote:
Michael Ben-Gershon wrote:
I am having terrible problems getting my new ADSL modem set up under
linux. Let me try to describe my setup.
This is probably your problem. The Siemens modem is preconfigured by
Bezeq to act as a router. You need to
Lior Okman wrote:
Michael Ben-Gershon wrote:
I am having terrible problems getting my new ADSL modem set up under
linux. Let me try to describe my setup.
My old ADSL modem was an Alcatel SpeedTouch (supplied by Bezeq). The
new one is a SIEMENS SL2-141 (also supplied by Bezeq).
I have an
Michael Ben-Gershon wrote:
I am having terrible problems getting my new ADSL modem set up under
linux. Let me try to describe my setup.
My old ADSL modem was an Alcatel SpeedTouch (supplied by Bezeq). The
new one is a SIEMENS SL2-141 (also supplied by Bezeq).
I have an internal network
I am having terrible problems getting my new ADSL modem set up under
linux. Let me try to describe my setup.
My old ADSL modem was an Alcatel SpeedTouch (supplied by Bezeq). The new
one is a SIEMENS SL2-141 (also supplied by Bezeq).
I have an internal network with a number of machines
Michael Ben-Gershon wrote:
I am having terrible problems getting my new ADSL modem set up under
linux.
I think that part of my problem may be that I am trying to use pptp,
where I really ought to be using pppoe. Is this correct? The reason I
ask is that I have not been able to get pppoe to
I am having terrible problems getting my new ADSL modem set up under
linux. Let me try to describe my setup.
My old ADSL modem was an Alcatel SpeedTouch (supplied by Bezeq). The new
one is a SIEMENS SL2-141 (also supplied by Bezeq).
I have an internal network with a number of machines connected
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:43:31PM +0200, David Shwatrz wrote:
> So I wonder - did anybody read this ? why is at "at cost" ? I expected
> it to be "at no cost"?
Why? The GPL does not require the source code to be FREE as in no money.
Exactly what "at cost" is, can be defined many ways all of whi
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 13:43 +0200, David Shwatrz wrote:
> Hi,
> >the 'L' in the model name is for Linux.
>
> I don't understand something: is the source code for the Linux kernel
> are open and available freely from LinkSys ? and in
> case it is so - from where can I get it ?
> I had went to th
Hi,
>the 'L' in the model name is for Linux.
I don't understand something: is the source code for the Linux kernel
and other applications running on
the WRT54GL (the kernel and applications which are shipped with it
upon purchase) are open and available freely from LinkSys ? and in
case it is so
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:43:07PM +0200, Yuval Hager wrote:
> the 'L' in the model name is for Linux.
> The latest (v8 I believe it is called) is running vxWorks.
What happened is the original version ran Linux. Linksys found that they
could use half the RAM, get better performance and prevent p
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Dan Shimshoni wrote:
> Suppose I have WRT54G-L route at home and it runs indeed LInux
> (because I heard there are versions of
> this router which do not run Liux).
>
the 'L' in the model name is for Linux.
The latest (v8 I believe it is called) is running vxWorks.
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:00:59PM +0200, Dan Shimshoni wrote:
> I am total newbie ob this, so my question may sound silly, but:
>
> >You could make sure and buy a Linksys WRT54G-L router and run a Linux
> >distro on it. Try Tomato www.polarcloud.com
>
> Suppose I have WRT54G-L route at home
plus ADSL2+ modem for a little more money (I currently use an ADSL1
> > modem on an ADSL2+ plan).
> >
> > I plan to visit abroad next month and connect the access point to
> > existing LAN's (so I can connect my workplace laptop over wireless
> > network). Does anyo
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 12:02 +, Amos Shapira wrote:
> I'm after a wireless access point. I saw the D-Link DI524 for a good
> price but also the that D-Link 604T can give the same functionality
> plus ADSL2+ modem for a little more money (I currently use an ADSL1
> modem on an ADSL2+ plan).
Any
you get a WRT54GL (or WRT54G
Yes, it's very tempting to have yet another Linux box to play around
with but all I need right now is a wireless access point to take to a
trip with me (and then use at home when I return) and if I could
upgrade my ADSL modem to 2+ on the way without much extra exp
modem on an ADSL2+ plan).
>
> I plan to visit abroad next month and connect the access point to
> existing LAN's (so I can connect my workplace laptop over wireless
> network). Does anyone know whether ADSL modems/wireless-routers can be
> used as plain access points on LAN? Or can t
ccess point to
existing LAN's (so I can connect my workplace laptop over wireless
network). Does anyone know whether ADSL modems/wireless-routers can be
used as plain access points on LAN? Or can they route only when used
with their ADSL port?
Thank
On Friday 06 July 2007 23:31, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 12:31 +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > I got the router and installation was "almost" painless - there's no free
> > lunch ;-)
>
> What router did you get ?
I was going to get the Bezeq supplied Rotal for 2 reasons - price
and
On Friday 06 July 2007 18:31, Dani Arbel wrote:
> Shlomo,
> In your configuration, eth0 spans the whole 10.0.0.0/8 range, and eth0:1
> has a range inside... this is not something recommanded. I wonder that it
As I wrote, that was only a work-around to solve the static IP problem. Since
I went to D
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 12:31 +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> I got the router and installation was "almost" painless - there's no free
> lunch ;-)
What router did you get ?
> The one small problem I had was that I always had static IP addresses on my
> machines and after 3 or 4 attempts to set up
Shlomo,
In your configuration, eth0 spans the whole 10.0.0.0/8 range, and eth0:1
has a range inside... this is not something recommanded. I wonder that it
even works. I guess your problem with the static setup was network mask.
All you have to do is staticaly config the machines exactly how the
On Friday 06 July 2007 13:57, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> In your case it would be simpler to assign static IP's outside of the
> DHCP range. For example, if the router is set to assign IPs from
> 192.168.0.10 to 192.168.0.100 and the netmask on that interface
> is 255.255.255.0, then you can u
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:31:10PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> BUT - I was now left with problematical /etc/host files on all the machines.
> I
> could no longer ping shlomo1 or shoshana, etc, but only by the dynamic IP. I
> solved that by adding a second IP address as follows:
In your case
I got the router and installation was "almost" painless - there's no free
lunch ;-)
I'm back on-line with excellent speed - so I guess the problem was the old
Alcatel Home.
The one small problem I had was that I always had static IP addresses on my
machines and after 3 or 4 attempts to set up
Hi,
This ADSL problem sounds like what I had from Friday till yesterday when
it went away. I also use a Linux firewall. I kept on getting email and
could go to the web via a proxy on the firewall but the going to the web
from my Linux computer behind the firewall directly did not work... I
spoke
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:57:10PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> Basically, I assume you mean that instead of
> computers---firewall boxrouter as you suggested earlier, I'd do
> other computers --- hub --- my Linux box (with iptables) --- router
> - I'd be using only o
and friends got, and I have a few points to make.
1. There are boxes which have, I'll call it, "ADSL connection". That is,
some port that a phone line can be plugged into and which talks ATM or
whatever to the DSLAM at Bezeq.
2. There are boxes which can do routing. That is, they know I
On Thursday 05 July 2007 22:40, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:18:48PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
<< snip >>
> > Since the whole purpose of the excercise ts to fix my connection problem,
> > I feel "safer" buying the Rotal router Bezeq provides. If there are any
> > p
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:18:48PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> I understand that the Linksys WRT54G-L is Linux friendly, but aside from the
> desire to support open source, why does that matter? You've all basically
> confirmed what the Bezeq technician said - the router is just plugged in and
Thanks for all the detailed replies. I'm actually left with only one question,
before I buy a router (as everyone has agreed).
I understand that the Linksys WRT54G-L is Linux friendly, but aside from the
desire to support open source, why does that matter? You've all basically
confirmed what th
so probably loads of
> connections) ... actually I think my newish ADSL router/modem is
> running Linux, but I never took the time to test it's routing.
A lot of routers today use Linux internally, but as suggested
previously, I recommend Linksys WRT54G-L. Linksys is very friendly to
op
d so well (high load being bittorrent, so probably
loads of connections) so I still do my routing through Linux, but you
can try find reviews on the net, I'm sure newer routers are better
equipped for modern day reality... actually I think my newish ADSL
router/modem is running Linux, but I ne
the internet to look for info on how to set up ppoe.
Here's your chance to download it before you start. :-)
> The technician offerd another alternative. He suggested getting a Rotal ADSL
> router for 24 payments of 9.90 (total cost 238). He said that this would
> solve my setu
at the line test
included testing the Bezeq DSLAM. I asked what else could be the problem, he
suggested a problem with my ethernet card (that's not it - I already tried a
different card), my hub (again no - I tried a direct cat-5 from my computer
to the ADSL modem) or the ADSL modem i
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 20:00 +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> Your suggestion about pinging with different sized packets showed me that I
> couldn't ping with more than 512 bytes. I set the mtu to 512 and can now send
> and receive e-mail, surf and even use ktorrent. But there are still problems:
>
in on line noises (no
need to mention ADSL issues. This will get a technician to you house,
who will be able to get past the first line of customer support and
preform a true diagnostics of the line quality.
Any ideas???
--
Shlomo Solomon
http://the-solomons.net
Sent by KMail (KDE 3.5.4) o
On 7/3/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 03/07/07, shlomo solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this arrives twice, but my original message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't arrive after waiting an hour.
To the list managers - maybe an attachment to the end of messages is in
order
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 11:27, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:18:01AM +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > I contacted 015 and after being instructed to telnet into one of their
> > servers and succeeding (telnet 192.114.186.54 110) they said they had no
> > idea what
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 11:27 +0300, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:18:01AM +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
> [snip]
> > I contacted 015 and after being instructed to telnet into one of their
> > servers and succeeding (telnet 192.114.186.54 110) they said they had no
> > idea wh
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:18:01AM +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
[snip]
> I contacted 015 and after being instructed to telnet into one of their
> servers and succeeding (telnet 192.114.186.54 110) they said they had no
> idea what to do (we don't support Linux). The only thing they suggested was
>
On 03/07/07, shlomo solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry if this arrives twice, but my original message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't arrive after waiting an hour.
Don't know about your problem but the linux.org.il alias was shut down a few
weeks ago and only mail to cs.huji.ac.il is accept
>From my personal experience, Bezeq is absolutely useless.
I've had regular conversations that go like this "Hi, is there a problem
with the ADSL in my area?" "No" "But I have this problem, I haven't
changed anything on my PC, and last time this happened,
Sorry if this arrives twice, but my original message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't arrive after waiting an hour.
-- Forwarded message --
From: shlomo solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 3, 2007 7:28 AM
Subject: ADSL connection problem
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAI
I have the BFocus 312+ at my parents place. It's a chip box which doesn't do
much more than the default config.
It can't do UPNP (even though you can activate it in the web), I assume it
can't really do RIP.
It is low on CPU and RAM (so NAT + P2P file sharing will almost suffocate
it).
And... for
On 12/05/07, Dan Shimshoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have two questions:
1) Suppose I will enable routing (RIPv2). Is it a good thing
to do ? What are the benefits of doing so? By doing so, does that mean
that the routing tables in the kernel will be updated
from time to time by the user-spa
Hello,
I am connected to the Internet through bezeq ; my modem/router is BFocus
312+ (ECI).
I had performed telnet to the BFocus 312+ (telnet 10.0.0.138, Admin/Admin).
It is a Linux-based machine, running 2.4.17-based kernel, as cat
/proc/version
shows (more precisely, 2.4.17_mvl21-malta-mips_f
thinking about
> changing to cable connection since it seems that ADSL connection here is
> far from reliable.
Well, one swallow does not make a spring. So far my ADSL connection has been
very reliable and I've been very happy with it. Have you been having any
previous problems to believ
o cable connection since it seems that ADSL connection here is
> far from reliable.
>
> --
> Ori Idan
>
See here:
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3366122,00.html
--
Meir Kriheli
=
To unsubscribe, send mail t
In the last 4 days, my Internet connection is off for few hours each day due
to Bezeq prbolems in my area (Herzelia)
Does someone have any idea what causes these problems?
Also what is your experience with cables today? I am thinking about changing
to cable connection since it seems that ADSL
Hi Guys
I've been having alot of issues with speeds lately, and I'm wondering
what most people have found to be the optimal settings in Linux for ADSL
with various ISPs in Israel. I recall in the old days tweaking things
like TCP window size, MTU, etc... Can anyone provide some sett
Micha Feigin wrote:
unlike cable where
you can listen on your neighbors
Just a small note - Yes, you can listen on your neighbors if you serious
crypto-breaking[*] processing power at your disposal (and some custom
hardware, but that's the easy part).
[*] Read up on "Baseline Privacy"
===
6 a las 00:17 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson escribió:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:43:57PM +0200, Julian Daich wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This week I have the opportunity to connect a new Linux PC to the
> > > > > Internet with Bezeq´s ADSL via an
0-2006 a las 00:17 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson escribió:
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:43:57PM +0200, Julian Daich wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > This week I have the opportunity to connect a new Linux PC to the
> > > > > > Int
57PM +0200, Julian Daich wrote:
> > >
> > > > This week I have the opportunity to connect a new Linux PC to the
> > > > Internet with Bezeq´s ADSL via an Adtech( or whatever it is called) 600
> > > > modem/ ruter. I was surprised to find that there are not instructions
las 00:17 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson escribió:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:43:57PM +0200, Julian Daich wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This week I have the opportunity to connect a new Linux PC to the
> > > > > Internet with Bezeq´s ADSL via an
connect a new Linux PC to the
> > > Internet with Bezeq´s ADSL via an Adtech( or whatever it is called) 600
> > > modem/ ruter. I was surprised to find that there are not instructions of
> > > how to set the ruter, instead they( Bezeq) give you a CD with a program
> > >
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:43:57 +0200
Julian Daich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This week I have the opportunity to connect a new Linux PC to the
> Internet with Bezeq´s ADSL via an Adtech( or whatever it is called) 600
> modem/ ruter. I was surprised to fi
to connect a new Linux PC to the
> > > > Internet with Bezeq´s ADSL via an Adtech( or whatever it is called) 600
> > > > modem/ ruter. I was surprised to find that there are not instructions of
> > > > how to set the ruter, instead they( Bezeq) give y
jue, 12-10-2006 a las 00:17 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson escribió:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:43:57PM +0200, Julian Daich wrote:
> >
> > > This week I have the opportunity to connect a new Linux PC to the
> > > Internet with Bezeq´s ADSL via an Adtech( or whate
El jue, 12-10-2006 a las 00:17 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson escribió:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:43:57PM +0200, Julian Daich wrote:
>
> > This week I have the opportunity to connect a new Linux PC to the
> > Internet with Bezeq´s ADSL via an Adtech( or whatever it is cal
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:43:57PM +0200, Julian Daich wrote:
> This week I have the opportunity to connect a new Linux PC to the
> Internet with Bezeq´s ADSL via an Adtech( or whatever it is called) 600
> modem/ ruter. I was surprised to find that there are not instructions of
> ho
Hi all,
This week I have the opportunity to connect a new Linux PC to the
Internet with Bezeq´s ADSL via an Adtech( or whatever it is called) 600
modem/ ruter. I was surprised to find that there are not instructions of
how to set the ruter, instead they( Bezeq) give you a CD with a program
for
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:54:41PM +0300, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:34:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >Have you read the latest DWN? It could be that you can jump right to the
> > 21st century, leaving 32 bit behind.
> >
> Hi,
> Ta
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:34:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>Have you read the latest DWN? It could be that you can jump right to the
> 21st century, leaving 32 bit behind.
>
Hi,
Tanks for the tip. I would read it NOW if only I knew what DWN
means, and where it is a
As was already mentioned, for pppoe one has to get the eth interface up
with /sbin/ifconfig eth0 up. The question is how to overide the installer
intentions
to set the IP and the other parameters for the eth interface.
I hardly remember how to use the installer. What comes to mind is:
1) Goo
stalled
> > > dns-search bezeqint.net
> >
> > How about :
> >
> > iface eth0 inet manual
> > up /sbin/ifconfig eth0 up
> > down /sbin/ifconfig eth0 down
> >
> Good morning Gil and Shachar and thanks for the answers.
>
>
1 - 100 of 1153 matches
Mail list logo
