On Thursday 05 April 2007 09:26, Noam Meltzer wrote:
> On 4/5/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > QUESTION #3 - While GOOGLing for this, I found some mentions of EVMS. I
> > seem
> > to remember that on a previous version of Mandriva I had disk-access
> > problems
> > until I un-insta
On 4/5/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
QUESTION #1 - I don't know if it was neccessary to comment them all, but
the
link Noam pointed to mentioned dm-mirrror and dm-mod so I commented all
lines
including either of them. Was that the right thing to do?
I don't think it is necessa
Noam's idea about dmsetup was the solution. All the /dev/sdc partitions now
mount with no problem., but I would like to ask if what I've done may have
other side-effects. Below, I have 4 questions and I hope someone can answer
them:
Here's a small section of /lib/modules/2.6.17-5mdv/modules.dep
On 04/04/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mount("/dev/sdc9", "/c9", "reiserfs", MS_MGC_VAL, "") = -1 EBUSY (Device or
resource busy)
mount(2) says about this error:
EBUSY source is already mounted. Or, it cannot be remounted read-only,
because it still holds fi
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 22:04, Noam Meltzer wrote:
> I believe that the package on mandriva is called "dmsetup".
you're right
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa|grep dmsetup
dmsetup-1.02.09-1mdv2007.0
> Anyhow, even if that's wrong you should try the following commands:
>
> ls /dev/mapper/
I believe that the package on mandriva is called "dmsetup".
Anyhow, even if that's wrong you should try the following commands:
ls /dev/mapper/(existence of this directory is a good sign for
disk-mapper existence)
dmsetup deps (the output of this command should show you t
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 20:02, Noam Meltzer wrote:
> Hi,
> Maybe we're looking on the problem from the wrong direction.
> I find some occurrences on google like this one:
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=494987
I looked at the link you sent, and if I understand correctl
Hi,
Maybe we're looking on the problem from the wrong direction.
I find some occurrences on google like this one:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=494987
They are all referring to device-mapper in the end. Maybe it is the case in
yours. For example, on my kubuntu, i use lv
What kind of extended partition do you use on the other hard drives?
Could you show the complete fdisk -l of all disks/partitions?
Chaim
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 19:19, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 18:33, Chaim Keren Tzion wrote:
> > Please also send the output of: mount -
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 18:27, Chaim Keren Tzion wrote:
> Perhaps it is related to the extended partition type that you chose or how
> you made that partition.
> You are using:
> Device Id System
> /dev/sdc1 f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
I doubt that that'ds the problem for the following reasons:
well, not your case in any meaning of the world. just took a shot at the
dark.
from the linux nfs faq:
-
B3. Why can't I mount more than 255 NFS file systems on my client? Why is
it sometimes even less than 255?
A. On Linux, each mounted file system is assigned a major num
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 18:33, Chaim Keren Tzion wrote:
> Please also send the output of: mount -v /c9
> and the tail of dmesg after a mount attempt.
On the failed mount attempts, there is no info in dmesg or
in /var/log/messages. On successful mounts (of /dev/sdb partitions),
I get the follo
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 18:33, Noam Meltzer wrote:
> Hi,
> Is it possible that you are having too many mounts from the same type on
> your system?
> Can you please send the full output of 'cat /proc/mounts'?
>
I don't know what you mean by "too many mounts". Also, if that were the
problem, umou
Hi,
Is it possible that you are having too many mounts from the same type on
your system?
Can you please send the full output of 'cat /proc/mounts'?
- Noam
On 4/4/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 14:50, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 04/04/07, Shlomo Solomon <
Please also send the output of: mount -v /c9
and the tail of dmesg after a mount attempt.
Chaim
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 09:35, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> I'm having trouble adding a third SATA disk.
>
> I have 2 250 Gb SATA drives (/dev/sda and /dev/sdb).
> I added a 160 Gb drive and both fdisk a
Perhaps it is related to the extended partition type that you chose or how you
made that partition.
You are using:
Device Id System
/dev/sdc1 f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
I usually use:
Id System
5 Extended
Why put linux partitions in a Microsoft Extended partition (Type "f" W95 Ext'd
(LBA))?
Ma
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 14:50, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 04/04/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 April 2007 11:24, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > > What does "df /c9" give you?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]$ df /c8 /c9 /c10
> > FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% M
On 04/04/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 11:24, Amos Shapira wrote:
> What does "df /c9" give you?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]$ df /c8 /c9 /c10
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 15G 301M 15G 3% /
/dev/sda1
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 11:24, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 04/04/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su
> > Password:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] solomon]# mount /dev/sdc9
> > mount: /dev/sdc9 already mounted or /c9 busy
>
> What does "df /c9" give you?
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 11:38, Dan Armak wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > I tried all these before my previous post. The /dev/sdc partitions are
> > definitely not mounted.
>
> Maybe something like dmraid or lvm is using sdc9 to build logical volumes?
> Check with /
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> I tried all these before my previous post. The /dev/sdc partitions are
> definitely not mounted.
Maybe something like dmraid or lvm is using sdc9 to build logical volumes?
Check with /proc/mdstat, pvs, etc.
--
Dan Armak
=
On 04/04/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] solomon]# mount /dev/sdc9
mount: /dev/sdc9 already mounted or /c9 busy
What does "df /c9" give you?
--Amos
=
To unsubscri
you mean /proc/mounts and /etc/mtab ..
Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Shlomo Solomon, from the post of Wed, 04 Apr:
When I try to mount one of the /dev/sdc partitions from the control panel, I
get: mounting partition /dev/sdc9 in directory /c9 failed.
I have no idea
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 10:31, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Shlomo Solomon, from the post of Wed, 04 Apr:
> > When I try to mount one of the /dev/sdc partitions from the control
> > panel, I get: mounting partition /dev/sdc9 in directory /c9 failed.
>
> I have no idea what that control pan
Quoting Shlomo Solomon, from the post of Wed, 04 Apr:
>
> When I try to mount one of the /dev/sdc partitions from the control panel, I
> get: mounting partition /dev/sdc9 in directory /c9 failed.
I have no idea what that control panel actually does in the background,
and if Mandriva is no
I'm having trouble adding a third SATA disk.
I have 2 250 Gb SATA drives (/dev/sda and /dev/sdb).
I added a 160 Gb drive and both fdisk and the Mandriva control panel correctly
recognize it as /dev/sdc. The disk is OK (checked in a different computer).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] solomon]# fdisk -l /dev/
26 matches
Mail list logo
