on Friday, March 16, 2012, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > When I access smb://10.0.0.138 from Firefox, I can see the files on
> > the USB
> > disk. But when I try the same thing from Dolphin, Krusader or
> > Konqueror I'm
> > asked for a username and password. I discovered that if I enter user
> > as th
OK - I continued playing around and discovered a solution (although I'm not
sure I understand why it works).
Instead of smb://10.0.0.138 or smb://10.0.0.1 I tried
smb://user@10.0.0.138 and smb://user@10.0.0.1 and now I'm not being asked for
a password.
BTW - the same works for my xtreamer which
I have a D-link router (from Bezeq). It runs Samba so you can put a USB disk
on the home network.
When I access smb://10.0.0.138 from Firefox, I can see the files on the USB
disk. But when I try the same thing from Dolphin, Krusader or Konqueror I'm
asked for a username and password. I discover
> Here's somethig strange (although I don't think it's
> connected to my problem).
> I ran rpm -V apache and got no output. I assumed that meant
> everything is OK, but decided to try rpm -V -vv apache. This
> time I got lots of output, but none of it seems to have
> anything to do with owners
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 10:58, Karasik, Vitaly wrote:
> The last thing - can you run "rpm -V apache" in order to verify that
> all files from "apache" package have original ownership/permission?
Here's somethig strange (although I don't think it's connected to my problem).
I ran rpm -V apache
> > Can you please re-check (DocumentRoot in httpd.conf) that Apache is
> > looking under /var/www/html for docs? BTW, there is some
> problem with
> > server-status too. Where is your Apache ServerRoot? What about
> > permissions for this dir?
>
> I had already checked these, but here's the i
On Monday 01 August 2005 15:52, Karasik, Vitaly wrote:
> > That doesn't seem to be the problem:
> >
> > 1 - As far as I know, apache is running as group apache and
> > there's no problem with the group definition (or with any
> > other group definition).
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] solomon]$ cat /etc
On Monday 01 August 2005 06:34, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 8/1/05, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That doesn't seem to be the problem:
>
> I though you settled on the decision that the problem is the
> size of the file - could you justtry to create a file of just a little
> less than 2
> That doesn't seem to be the problem:
>
> 1 - As far as I know, apache is running as group apache and
> there's no problem with the group definition (or with any
> other group definition).
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] solomon]$ cat /etc/group|grep apache
> apache:x:78:
>
> 2 - I'm talking about one
On 8/1/05, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That doesn't seem to be the problem:
I though you settled on the decision that the problem is the
size of the file - could you justtry to create a file of just a little
less than 2Gb size and fetch it, then icrease the same file to
just a litt
On Sunday 31 July 2005 11:20, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
> Whew. I found the reason for the problem. Apache is running as
> group www and the group file had two groups www with different
> numerical ids. Must have some historical reason that we use a
> differing numerical id on a few machines. One of
quite easy: write the error in google and walla:
snip from a thread:
Whew. I found the reason for the problem. Apache is running as
group www and the group file had two groups www with different
numerical ids. Must have some historical reason that we use a
differing numerical id on a few machi
I haven't used Apache much, but quite a while ago, I did set up a (trivial)
web page to see how this worked. At the time, I had no real problems. Today,
I tried to access that page and got a 403 error.
Here's what I've tried so far.
1 - I looked for error messages and found the following
in /
(EET)
> > > From: guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: Tal Amir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > the linux-il mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: access
n 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:48:56 +0200 (IST)
> From: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tal Amir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> the linux-il mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re
D]>,
> >the linux-il mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: access problem
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Tal Amir wrote:
> >
> > > > telnet your-server 110
> > > >
> > > > If and when a (tcp) connection is esta
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Tal Amir wrote:
> thanks for the options..what would i do without you ? ;)
> telnet to port 110 works and authonticates (25 as well)
> with a client - nothing.
> so this is not a closed port\service problem.
ok. it might mean the client is trying to do something else _befor
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, guy keren wrote:
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:07:46 +0200 (EET)
> From: guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tal Amir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> the linux-il mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S
g list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: access problem
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Tal Amir wrote:
> >
> > > hi all,
> > >
> > > this is kind of trickey, so i'll try to be as clear as i can.
> > > i have a RH 6.2 machine at wo
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:00:14 +0200 (IST)
> From: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tal Amir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: the linux-il mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: access problem
>
&
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Tal Amir wrote:
> > telnet your-server 110
> >
> > If and when a (tcp) connection is established, try writing the following:
> >
> > USER username
> > PASS topsecretpasswordinplaintext
> > QUIT
>
> telnetto port's 110 and 25 works. only mail clients cant get to
> authonticate
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Tal Amir wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:08:00 +0200 (IST)
> > From: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Tal Amir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: the linux-il mailing list &
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:08:00 +0200 (IST)
> From: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tal Amir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: the linux-il mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: access problem
>
&
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Tal Amir wrote:
> hi all,
>
> this is kind of trickey, so i'll try to be as clear as i can.
> i have a RH 6.2 machine at work, functioning as a mail-relay to an
> exchange server sitting in the local LAN, with NAT address.
> the linux machine is in a DMZ, with 1 nic, real ip.
hi all,
this is kind of trickey, so i'll try to be as clear as i can.
i have a RH 6.2 machine at work, functioning as a mail-relay to an
exchange
server sitting in the local LAN, with NAT address.
the linux machine is in a DMZ, with 1 nic, real ip.
everything worked wonderfull for more then 2 ye
25 matches
Mail list logo
