Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, Omer Zak wrote about "You forgot about videophones (useful for
>the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)":
> >
> > VIDEOPHONES! VIDEOPHONES!! VIDEOPHONES!!! VIDEOPHONES
> > They need at least 384Kbps
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> And another question? I know that videophonesover ISDN exist for many years
> now. Does that mean that 128kbps is maybe enough for a videophone? Or does
> that mean the image will be too small or too fuzzy to read lips, or something?
According to exper
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: You forgot about videophones (useful
for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)":
>
> - Original Message -
> You are wrong (sorry). ADSL is completly asynchronous (that's what the A
> stands for).
I'm sorr
- Original Message -
From: "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't *DSL technology allows for a fixed
> *total* bandwidth, and it is up to the implementation to decide how much
> bandwidth it reserves for each direction? The 64kbps choice was probably
mad
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, Omer Zak wrote about "You forgot about videophones (useful for
the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)":
>
> VIDEOPHONES! VIDEOPHONES!! VIDEOPHONES!!! VIDEOPHONES
> They need at least 384Kbps in each direction to provide high quality
> pictures.
C
