nohup" for your X applications. :-)
Hmm, sounds like the idea I suggested might be a simple addition to this proxy...
Alexander Maryanovsky.
- Original Message -
From: Alex Shnitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 24 Apr 2002 11:46:27 +0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: X server c
Another good piece of software that is worth mentioning in the context
of this thread is xmove, which can be found at
ftp://ftp.cs.columbia.edu/pub/xmove/ or as the Debian package "xmove".
Basically it's an X server proxy that allows you to move X applications
connected to it from one X server t
t; > <http://www.edu.uni-klu.ac.at/~mkropfbe/xray.html> ?
>
> If you mention those two, then one obvious alternative should also be
> mentioned: Xnest (which comes, e.g. with XFree).
Xnest is indeed very cool, and I use it a lot, but it won't solve
the original posters&
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:22:39AM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 23:41:39 +0300
> > "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >... snipped long talk about VNC
> I think many of the crashes of X servers in Linux are h
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002, Ilya Konstantinov wrote about "Re: X server crashes":
> On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 14:55, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
> Alexander does have a point here. Of course, there are certain things
> which can be kept on server only (e.g. server-side stored pixmaps),
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 14:55, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
> Hmm, I guess this was my confusion... I'm a Java developer, so I'm used to
>everything display related to be event driven. That is, in Java (AWT and Swing at
>least), the application is supposed to always keep all the state, and be able
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:55:07 +0200
"Alexander Maryanovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not wait until it's reconnected
Answer is in next paragraph...
> > However, there is a lot of "state" stored in
> > the X-server (Graphics-Context etc.),
> Hmm, I guess this was my confusion... I'm a Jav
l of a sudden: KABBBOMMM.
> Sorry, all your state is lost...
Well, like I said, I thought the applications were supposed to keep all the state, not
the X-server.
Alexander Maryanovsky.
- Original Message -
From: Oron Peled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 23
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:22:39AM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 23:41:39 +0300
> "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >... snipped long talk about VNC
>
> I'm very well familiar with VNC, thanks. However you should remember
> that vncserver is an X-server for the app
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 23:41:39 +0300
"Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... snipped long talk about VNC
I'm very well familiar with VNC, thanks. However you should remember
that vncserver is an X-server for the applications that use it (while
at the same time talking a different protocol to
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002, Oron Peled wrote about "Re: X server crashes":
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:50:10 +0200
> "Alexander Maryanovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So I guess I have two questions:
> > 1. What is the technical reason processes crash
Most X server crashes that happend to me was from the (shitty) xfs font server
found under redhat.
Hetz
On Sunday 21 April 2002 23:04, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:50:10 +0200
>
> "Alexander Maryanovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I guess I
the processes and the
> X server which would delegate everything to it, make X server
> crashes transparent to the processes and allow restarting
> the X server (again transparently to the processes) when it
> goes down? It seems like a fairly simple thing to do...
You could put a
Hi,
After posting this on gnubies and receiving no answer, posting here, in hope to
receive some :-)
A co-worker of mine complained to me that the X server crashes sometimes and along
with it all the processes using it. Now, I'm not a big unix/linux expert, but it
seemed kind of stran
14 matches
Mail list logo
