> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Shnitman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 17:17, Ira Abramov wrote:
> > Quoting Michael Sternberg, from the post of Mon, 10 Feb:
> > > >
> > > > Errr... MAC address or IP address? Why the hell play with the MAC
> > > > address?
> > >
> >
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 17:17, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Michael Sternberg, from the post of Mon, 10 Feb:
> > > Errr... MAC address or IP address? Why the hell play with the MAC
> > > address?
> >
> > Because they all coming from production facilities with MAC
> > of 00:00:00:00:00:00. I just hav
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003, Ira Abramov wrote about "Re: Weird IP problem...":
> > Because they all coming from production facilities with MAC
> > of 00:00:00:00:00:00. I just have to change it to something
> > reasonable in bootloader.
>
> say WHAT?
> never
Quoth Michael Sternberg:
> Because they all coming from production facilities with MAC
> of 00:00:00:00:00:00. I just have to change it to something
> reasonable in bootloader.
Meir, could you please tell us who is the AH who builds nics with nulled
macs? That is a crime against humanity.
OZ: Yo
Quoting Michael Sternberg, from the post of Mon, 10 Feb:
> > Errr... MAC address or IP address? Why the hell play with the MAC
> > address?
>
> Because they all coming from production facilities with MAC
> of 00:00:00:00:00:00. I just have to change it to something
> reasonable in bootloader.
sa
> -Original Message-
> From: Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
>
> > No, two machines with the same MAC are two different
> > PPC machines that MAC address can be set up by ignorant
> > user (like me :).
>
> Errr... MAC address or IP address? Why the hell play with the MAC
> address?
Becau
Quoth Michael Sternberg:
> No, two machines with the same MAC are two different
> PPC machines that MAC address can be set up by ignorant
> user (like me :).
Errr... MAC address or IP address? Why the hell play with the MAC
address?
--
---OFCNL
This is MY list. This list belongs to ME! I
> -Original Message-
> From: Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
>
> > It seems that there were two computers with
> > same MAC address as of 172.17.4.202 on local
> > subnet. Thanks everybody.
>
> TWO machines with the SAME MAC address is one machine with a
> damaged NIC or spoofed MAC.
No,
Quoth Michael Sternberg:
>
> Sorry, my mistake.
> It seems that there were two computers with
> same MAC address as of 172.17.4.202 on local
> subnet. Thanks everybody.
TWO machines with the SAME MAC address is one machine with a damaged NIC
or spoofed MAC.
Marc
--
---OFCNL
This is MY lis
1. Does each computer successfully ping itself in its own NIC's IP
address?
2. Does 172.17.4.1 communicate with other computers in the network?
3. Does 172.17.4.202 communicate with other computers in the network?
4. While there is no firewall, is there a bridge or router between them?
My suspi
10 matches
Mail list logo