Re: regarding cross-forwarding (was: Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd))

1999-12-25 Thread Moran
mp;bet;&resh; 1999 17:19 Subject: Re: regarding cross-forwarding (was: Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd)) >> i tend to agree with ely about one thing here - there was a thread >> discussing vulnerabilities in wuftpd, and he simply forwar

Re: regarding cross-forwarding (was: Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd))

1999-12-25 Thread Adam Morrison
> i tend to agree with ely about one thing here - there was a thread > discussing vulnerabilities in wuftpd, and he simply forwarded something > that relevant to that specific thread. this by itself adds some value to > the discussion. perhaps as a compromise, next time, ely, simply send a > refer

Re: regarding cross-forwarding (was: Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd))

1999-12-22 Thread guy keren
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Ely Levy wrote: > what's the diffrent between sending the e-mail or the url? > it's stil takes one letter and it wasn't that long to be slow or anything it shows that you give some respect to other people's wishes. also, i don't remember that people ever complained about re

regarding cross-forwarding (was: Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd))

1999-12-22 Thread guy keren
i tend to agree with ely about one thing here - there was a thread discussing vulnerabilities in wuftpd, and he simply forwarded something that relevant to that specific thread. this by itself adds some value to the discussion. perhaps as a compromise, next time, ely, simply send a reference (i.e

Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd)

1999-12-22 Thread Adam Morrison
> > yea I think that if there is new software annocemnt or new linux kernel > > realsed and it's related to the topic we talk about at the time it could > > be forwarded > > > > My god. If that's true, then let me out of this list. FAST! No need to get off the list, just plonk him into your kill

Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd)

1999-12-22 Thread Alex Shnitman
On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 08:32:45PM +0200, Ely Levy wrote: > you would feel better if I wrote it in my own words?:) No. My take on this -- post any *original material* here, on anything that has to do with Linux, even though there are other forums for those specific topics; but don't *reproduce*

Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd)

1999-12-22 Thread Ely Levy
you would feel better if I wrote it in my own words?:) yea I think that if there is new software annocemnt or new linux kernel realsed and it's related to the topic we talk about at the time it could be forwarded ll&P Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel On Wed, 22 Dec 19

Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd)

1999-12-22 Thread Adam Morrison
> Part of linux is its security believe it or not, > almost everything we talk about I can find you some other mailing list > that talk about it > if it's about hardisk Ip masquarting ssh and even hebrew in linux has its > own mailing list. > You might want to read all those security news groups

Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd)

1999-12-22 Thread Ely Levy
Part of linux is its security believe it or not, almost everything we talk about I can find you some other mailing list that talk about it if it's about hardisk Ip masquarting ssh and even hebrew in linux has its own mailing list. You might want to read all those security news groups and screen th

Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0)configurations(fwd)

1999-12-22 Thread Aviram Jenik
> it's not off bugtraq and I only send it cause people were talking about > wuftp security for the last few days okay, it's not off bugtraq, it's from technotronic news. But if you have nothing new to add to that advisory, please do not post it to the Linux list. People that are interested in

Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0) configurations(fwd)

1999-12-22 Thread Ely Levy
it's not off bugtraq and I only send it cause people were talking about wuftp security for the last few days and in a matter of fact I think that linux related security e-mails/varnubilties should be on the list after bugtraq send you varnubilties for all platforms..and we talking about linux her

Re: Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0) configurations(fwd)

1999-12-22 Thread Adam Morrison
Ely Levy wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - the dangers of ftp conversions on misconfigured systems/ftpd >(specifically wu-ftpd) > [useless advisory deleted.] Is this really necessary? People interested in this should subscribe to bugtraq, or whatever. ===

Vulnerability in certain WU-FTP (versions up till 2.6.0) configurations(fwd)

1999-12-22 Thread Ely Levy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - the dangers of ftp conversions on misconfigured systems/ftpd (specifically wu-ftpd) Summary: There exists a vulnerability with certain configurations of certain ftp daemons with which users with a valid ftp only acccount on a system may execute arbitrary com