2009/3/11 Danny Lieberman :
> Amos
> I'm using slicehost for a few projects and I'm extremely satisfied. Response
> time from Israel is outstanding - for Web and ssh. They setup a new slice in
> minutes and their customer service is rackspace quality
Thanks for the feedback. I think my boss also h
Amos
I'm using slicehost for a few projects and I'm extremely satisfied. Response
time from Israel is outstanding - for Web and ssh. They setup a new slice in
minutes and their customer service is rackspace quality
Danny
--
Danny Lieberman
2009/3/5 Ira Abramov :
> I've been waiting for KVM to hit the prime-time for a while, I remember
> Mulix told me a year ago it's "Xen done the right way" and it should be
I'm waiting for it to - but in the meantime I still need to Get Things
Done so I stick to whatever comes pre-packaged and suppo
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 06:12, Ira Abramov wrote:
> None give KVM/Qumranet, OpenVZ and the rest even the tiniest mention.
>
> know anyone using it in production at least, and are they professionally
> happy with it?
We use both KVM and OpenVZ. We are happy with OpenVZ but not so much with
KV
27;s SolidICE sounds pretty sweet "on paper".
Anyone using it in production? their site is not very detailed, there's
no trial version that I can find from either them or from RHAT. Also, So
far all posts and articles I saw comparing hypervisors picked Citrix
against VMware, occas
Ira Abramov wrote:
I want to make life easy for two clients of mine who want to go virtual,
but are set against MS as host (Not my work, I swear! :)
Citrix XenServer is free, in case you missed it:
http://www.citrix.com/English/ps2/products/feature.asp?contentID=1686939
ESXi has been free for
On Wednesday, 4 בMarch 2009, Ira Abramov wrote:
> This is what I need for the clients. Both are good at windows, only
> starting out in Linux. Both need something that's not too techie and CLI to
> manage. ESXi has been the automatic no-brainer choice, but with
> XenServer being free I'll need to a
I want to make life easy for two clients of mine who want to go virtual,
but are set against MS as host (Not my work, I swear! :)
Citrix XenServer is free, in case you missed it:
http://www.citrix.com/English/ps2/products/feature.asp?contentID=1686939
ESXi has been free for a while as well:
https
Aharon,
I have had a few successful runs with vmware (why not switch to VirtualBox?)
by using the vmware-any-any package available from here:
http://platan.vc.cvut.cz/ftp/pub/vmware/
http://platan.vc.cvut.cz/ftp/pub/vmware/vmware-any-any-update115.tar.gz
appears to be the latest, but it
Hi.
I just installed VMware-Player-2.5.1-126130.i386.rpm
When I run vmplayer, I get the message:
C header files matching your running kernel were not found.
kernel headers for version 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 were not found.
I have the following installed:
rpm -q -a | grep -i kernel
kernel
Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi poeple,
> >
> > I'm thinking to install VMWare ESX 3.0 at my house for some testings
> > few ideas of mine.
> >
> > As you may know, ESX can be installed on IDE/SATA drive, but you
> > cannot create VM's
, Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi poeple,
>
> I'm thinking to install VMWare ESX 3.0 at my house for some testings
> few ideas of mine.
>
> As you may know, ESX can be installed on IDE/SATA drive, but you
> cannot create VM's nor create VMFS partiti
Hi poeple,
I'm thinking to install VMWare ESX 3.0 at my house for some testings
few ideas of mine.
As you may know, ESX can be installed on IDE/SATA drive, but you
cannot create VM's nor create VMFS partitions unless your hard disk is
SCSI one.
At first, I thought about plugging some
> > to the initrd can solve the problem.
> >
> > Is it a way to achive same on Windows, i.e boot
> > windows, which was installed "native" under VMWare
> ?
> >
> > Valery
> >
>
> See this page for SCSI Disk Drivers
>
http://www
http://www.vmware.com/support/ws3/doc/ws32_disks8.html
Have fun :)
Valery Reznic wrote:
> Good day.
>
> I have dual-boot computer with Linux on one partition
> (sda1) and WinXP on the other (sda2).
>
> Linux has VMware installed.
> (VMware-server-1.0.2-39867)
>
>
On 4/5/07, Valery Reznic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good day.
I have dual-boot computer with Linux on one partition
(sda1) and WinXP on the other (sda2).
Linux has VMware installed.
(VMware-server-1.0.2-39867)
Now, I want boot into Linux, and from VMware run
windows, installed in th
Good day.
I have dual-boot computer with Linux on one partition
(sda1) and WinXP on the other (sda2).
Linux has VMware installed.
(VMware-server-1.0.2-39867)
Now, I want boot into Linux, and from VMware run
windows, installed in the sda2.
VMware-server allows specify whole disk or partition
to
On 09/02/07, guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
download the software, get a 30-days evaluation license, and see if this
actually solves the problem. better then to pay up-front and then fount
it does not help you.
Yes, of course I'll test it first - but if I find that it helps me it will
s
download the software, get a 30-days evaluation license, and see if this
actually solves the problem. better then to pay up-front and then fount
it does not help you.
--guy
Amos Shapira wrote:
Hello,
Short question - do I have to buy VMware Workstation 5 in order to make
Windows XP Pro
Hello,
Short question - do I have to buy VMware Workstation 5 in order to make
Windows XP Pro work with Logitech Quickcam Pro 4000 webcam?
Details:
I installed Windows XP Pro without a hitch on VMware Server 1.0.1 build
29996 on top of Debian Etch (kernel 2.6.18-3-k7) and it works pretty well
egarding desktop cpu's also affected by this - most cpu's
today (desktop,mobile) have frequency scaling.
Note, this issue is not limited to VMware only, AFAIK Microsoft
VirtualPC/Server is also affected by this.
On 1/20/07, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jacob Broido w
Jacob Broido wrote:
> Are you using Vmware on Intel based laptop?
I read the relevant passage. I (VMWare workstation hosted on Linux) am
running it on a laptop with an Intel chip, but the other people (VMWare
Server hosted on Windows XP) run it on a desktop. The problem happens
both here and th
Are you using Vmware on Intel based laptop?
On 1/20/07, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jacob Broido wrote:
> Hi,
> The reason you experience slowdown in Vmware 6 (beta) as compared to
> Vmware 5.x is because as it names suggest - a beta.
>
> VMware 6 has ex
Jacob Broido wrote:
> Hi,
> The reason you experience slowdown in Vmware 6 (beta) as compared to
> Vmware 5.x is because as it names suggest - a beta.
>
> VMware 6 has extra debugging&tracing capabilities and features
> included into it, and these cannot be disabled in be
Hi,
The reason you experience slowdown in Vmware 6 (beta) as compared to Vmware
5.x is because as it names suggest - a beta.
VMware 6 has extra debugging&tracing capabilities and features included
into it, and these cannot be disabled in beta release.
Actually the software tells you this
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 16:42 +0200, Nati CT wrote:
> VM6 is designed to use Intel's VT or AMD-V (which P4 doesn't have).
> I think that's why you suffer from bad performance.
So, if I want to get any decent performance with VMWare on a CPU with no
hardware virtualization, I s
VM6 is designed to use Intel's VT or AMD-V (which P4 doesn't have).
I think that's why you suffer from bad performance.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Hetz Ben Hamo
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 3:35 PM
To: Linux-IL
Subje
Hi,
I wanted to share my experience with VMWare 6 beta with you people..
Machine: Pentium 4 2.80Ghz, 2GB RAM, 120GB disk, CentOS 4.4 + updates.
VMWare: Version 6 (Workstation) Build 36983.
VMWare 6 has some really nice features when it comes to memory support
(up to 3.5GB), USB 2.0 support
Erez D wrote:
> hi
>
> i changed from running xp. to vmware with xp as a guest os, and edgy
> (ubuntu 6.10 linux) as host.
> i want to access the ntfs partitions from my guest os,
> i tried to configure vmware, but was not able to, it just didn't let
> me use nor /dev/
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:22 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> I assume that NTFS sits on the guest machine, right?
s/guest machine/host machine/g
Sigh... Not my day.
- Gilboa
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the wo
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:02 +0200, Erez D wrote:
> hi
>
> i changed from running xp. to vmware with xp as a guest os, and edgy
> (ubuntu 6.10 linux) as host.
> i want to access the ntfs partitions from my guest os,
> i tried to configure vmware, but was not able to, it just d
hi
i changed from running xp. to vmware with xp as a guest os, and edgy (ubuntu
6.10 linux) as host.
i want to access the ntfs partitions from my guest os,
i tried to configure vmware, but was not able to, it just didn't let me use
nor /dev/sda neither /dev/sda1
as either disk, plainDisk,
guy keren wrote:
> why are you trying to use the server edition anyway, and not a
> workstation edition?
Because VMWare Server is free (as in beer), while VMWare Workstation
costs $189.
> did you verify that the server edition is supposed
> to work on more then a limited set of d
On 03/01/2007 12:23, Amos Shapira wrote:
On 03/01/07, *guy keren* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
just a silly question - what is 'VMware 1.0.1'?
I meant "vmware server 1.0.1".
I'm mostly following the ivery simple instr
On 03/01/07, guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just a silly question - what is 'VMware 1.0.1'?
I meant "vmware server 1.0.1".
I'm mostly following the ivery simple instructions in
http://www.howtoforge.com/debian_sarge_vmware_server_howto
VMware has ma
On 03/01/07, Lior Okman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Amos Shapira wrote:
VMWare has its own copies of most of the shared objects under (on your
computer) /usr/lib/vmware-server-console/lib/ . You could try modifying
the /usr/lib/vmware-server-console/lib/wrapper-gtk24.sh shellscript
just a silly question - what is 'VMware 1.0.1'?
VMware has many products - most of them have higher current version
numbers.
other then that - this sounds like a compiler versions mismatch to me -
for some reason, your vmware-thingy is taking gnome libraries from your
system, instead
Hello,
I've finally got around to try vmware on my home desktop.
My setup:
Debian Etch on AMD Athlon 2500 (Barton?) with 1.2 Gb RAM.
VMware 1.0.1 (just downloaded from vmware.com)
vmware-console installed as .deb file converted using alien
Gnome desktop (2.14)
gcc 3.3, 3.4, 4.0, an
Jacob Broido wrote:
> 1)Shutdown the vm
> 2) vmware-vdiskmanager -x
> 3) boot the VM
3.5) Make a VMWare snapshot, so that if step 4 goes wrong, you'll still
be ok.
> 4) Resize the partition & filesystems using standard linux tools...
> (parted,etc...)
booted from a li
1)Shutdown the vm
2) vmware-vdiskmanager -x
3) boot the VM
4) Resize the partition & filesystems using standard linux tools...
(parted,etc...)
Voila.
On 10/26/06, Jacob Broido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
Inorder to answer you, I need some more inputs from you.
1) Which
1)Shutdown the vm2) vmware-vdiskmanager -x 3) boot the VM4) Resize the partition & filesystems using standard linux tools... (parted,etc...)Voila.
On 10/26/06, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Ben-Nes wrote:> Hello,>> I need to move Debian from a Vmware with
Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to move Debian from a Vmware with 1GB space to a new one with 2GB.
> What is the easiest way to achieve exact copy ?
Same as between hard disks, I guess.
Connect the new hard disk to the existing machine. Create the partition
layout you wa
Hey,Inorder to answer you, I need some more inputs from you.1) Which product of Vmware are you talking about? Is it ESX ? or Workstation,GSX,Server?2) You've mentioned 1GB->2GB... Do you want to extend existing VM of 1GB to span accross 2GB ?
Is it acceptable for you to perform an
Hello,I need to move Debian from a Vmware with 1GB space to a new one with 2GB.What is the easiest way to achieve exact copy ?Thanks,Miki
-- --Michael Ben-Nes - Internet Consultant and Director.http://www.epoch.co.il - weaving the Net.Cellular: 054
how about user-mode-linux, isn't it better for this perpose (i.e. as a sandbox) ?On 8/29/06, Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:37:13PM +0300, Gil Freund wrote:> >Yes, but that makes the domU trusted (an attacker with root access ot
> >the domU can easily take dow
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:37:13PM +0300, Gil Freund wrote:
> >Yes, but that makes the domU trusted (an attacker with root access ot
> >the domU can easily take down the entire machine - unless you have an
> >isolation capable IOMMU)
>
> Can you elaborate a little more? Does this mean that if the
t/DomU? Is this true for any hardware access, or for NICs only?
> VMware will only allow the usage of the NIC as bridge (albeit,
> without an IP address).
Xen can do this too, of course.
Xen can do both, which is what I like about it. I am skeptical about
running Windows 2003 as DomU wit
On 8/29/06, Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Gil Freund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was asked about putting a firewall in Virtual Server environment.
You may be interested in this VMware appliance[1,2]
This means it's doable. My concern is &
"Gil Freund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was asked about putting a firewall in Virtual Server environment.
You may be interested in this VMware appliance[1,2]
http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/245
- a winning entry (3rd prize) to the VMware Ultimat
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:36:27AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Solution: RTFM ethtool for the command line option to disable hardware
> offloading of checksum calculation.
ethtool -K ethN tx off
> Muli,
> This seems to me like a conceptual bug in the way Xen determines which
> is the true de
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:17:53AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
>
>> If you do set it up like that (and I did), please be sure to turn off
>> hardware checksum generation for TCP/IP, or you'll have trouble
>> connecting from the Xen machines that are behind the firew
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:17:53AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
>
>> If you do set it up like that (and I did), please be sure to turn off
>> hardware checksum generation for TCP/IP, or you'll have trouble
>> connecting from the Xen machines that are behind the firew
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:17:53AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> If you do set it up like that (and I did), please be sure to turn off
> hardware checksum generation for TCP/IP, or you'll have trouble
> connecting from the Xen machines that are behind the firewall to the
> internet
There were s
the domU can easily take down the entire machine - unless you have an
isolation capable IOMMU)
> VMware will only allow the usage of the NIC as bridge (albeit,
> without an IP address).
Xen can do this too, of course.
Cheers,
Muli
=
Gil Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was asked about putting a firewall in Virtual Server environment.
> As far as I can tell, XEN will allow me to assign a NIC as a PCI
> desvice to a DomU. VMware will only allow the usage of the NIC as
> bridge (albeit, without an IP address).
Huh?
Hi,
I was asked about putting a firewall in Virtual Server environment.
As far as I can tell, XEN will allow me to assign a NIC as a PCI
desvice to a DomU. VMware will only allow the usage of the NIC as
bridge (albeit, without an IP address).
My worries:
1. Will a DoS on the firewall "lea
On Wednesday June 14 2006 00:16, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> "Marc A. Volovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And that goes to show that flash attracts flash :-)...
>
> I am sorry, I use FC4 on x86_64 on my home machine, and flash is one
> thing that is repelled because there is no x86_86 player for
Quoth Muli Ben-Yehuda:
> More details please... with xen3 we switched to a single kernel for
> both dom0 and domU, the -xen kernel. Are you passing
Unsurprisingly whatsoever, it bloody works. Why do I bother reading
Makefiles is beyond me.
Attached is the kernel config I am using which works qu
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:00:39PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
The Fedora Core line is a non production distribution *by design*.
Since when has this ever stopped a customer from actually using it in
exactly that capacity. I heard a talk at USENIX last wee
Quoth Muli Ben-Yehuda:
> Ok, since I hit it in one, here's another gotcha free of charge - with
I looked at the docs, thought - "hmmm... no xen0 and xenU, weird, let's
look at the Makefile... Ah - here they are, the references to xenU and
xen0, everything is as it used to be..."
Hehe. Thanks!
>
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:12:44AM +0300, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
> Quoth Muli Ben-Yehuda:
>
> > More details please... with xen3 we switched to a single kernel for
> > both dom0 and domU, the -xen kernel. Are you passing
> > 'KERNELS=...-domU' perchance? I wouldn't expect that to work.
>
> Duh! I
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 08:20:20AM +0300, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
> Quoth Marc A. Volovic:
>
> > I use Xen with Debian (woody, sarge and etch) with not problem whatsoever.
> > The dom0 is etch, domUs are a mix, all very very small (sub 60MB).
>
> That is - xen 2.4. All my attempts to build xen 3 s
Marc A. Volovic wrote:
Quoth Marc A. Volovic:
I use Xen with Debian (woody, sarge and etch) with not problem whatsoever.
The dom0 is etch, domUs are a mix, all very very small (sub 60MB).
That is - xen 2.4. All my attempts to build xen 3 so far fail - I can not
seem to be able to buil
Quoth Marc A. Volovic:
> I use Xen with Debian (woody, sarge and etch) with not problem whatsoever.
> The dom0 is etch, domUs are a mix, all very very small (sub 60MB).
That is - xen 2.4. All my attempts to build xen 3 so far fail - I can not
seem to be able to build a xenU kernel correctly. Grrr
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:16:44AM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> I will not defend the Xen build system, but FC is one of the platforms
> (RHEL is another) that Xen can actually live with. So far I cannot say
> the same about, say, SuSE (never heard of anyone who managed to have a
> working netw
Quoth Oleg Goldshmidt:
> I will not defend the Xen build system, but FC is one of the platforms
> (RHEL is another) that Xen can actually live with. So far I cannot say
> the same about, say, SuSE (never heard of anyone who managed to have a
> working network in a SuSE domU - has anyone here made
an MII API either.
and no switch, no cables. it's all trickery in the VMware application.
you really should install it once to know what the fuss is about :)
--
Very very available
Ira Abramov
http://ira.abramov.org/email/
=
To
"Marc A. Volovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And that goes to show that flash attracts flash :-)...
I am sorry, I use FC4 on x86_64 on my home machine, and flash is one
thing that is repelled because there is no x86_86 player for
Linux... ;-)
> Speaking of which - whoever among you people is
? What does ethtool say?
Is the switch smart enough to report to report error?
Might seem self evident, but did you check different cables or ports?
the solution was of course to make-do with a Q&D solution, being mkisofs
and mounting it via the VMWARE CD device. still it didn't solve
On Tuesday, 13 בJune 2006 18:33, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:00:39PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> > The Fedora Core line is a non production distribution *by design*.
> I heard a talk at USENIX last week[1] where Pixar's VP of Technology
> mentioned that their new movie
Quoth Gilad Ben-Yossef:
> Marc A. Volovic wrote:
>
> I wrote an email saying the same thing (although the word "orchideae"
> was missing from it for some reason ;-) and then decided Ira knew better
> already.
Must have been an oversight. I know (by dint of deduction) that you 'havem.
> The Fe
Suppose your eyesight is failing you and you are going to a clinic to
have your eyes fixed by laser.
If they find that you have retinal degradation in your eyes, you deny
this and insist upon getting laser - what should an ethical clinic do?
Should this answer be any different if the clinic are don
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:41:37PM +0300, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
> Speaking of which - whoever among you people is responsible for Xen's build
> system should be compelled to use FC.
That would be the Cambridge folks. They've proven remarkably resistant
to attempts to fix it.
Cheers,
Muli
=
le uplink at home!
the solution was of course to make-do with a Q&D solution, being mkisofs
and mounting it via the VMWARE CD device. still it didn't solve the fact
that other things had to be NFS-accessable.
The solution was amazingly simple. the client gave me two dual-Xeons to
ins
Quoth Muli Ben-Yehuda:
> Pixar's VP of Technology mentioned that their new movie "Cars" was
> rendered on a farm of x86-64 Linux machines running ... you guessed it
> ... Fedora Core.
And that goes to show that flash attracts flash :-)...
Speaking of which - whoever among you people is responsib
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:00:39PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> The Fedora Core line is a non production distribution *by design*.
Since when has this ever stopped a customer from actually using it in
exactly that capacity. I heard a talk at USENIX last week[1] where
Pixar's VP of Technology
Quoth Gilad Ben-Yossef:
> The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single "oy."
And it continues with numerous other pitiful cries, groans, ejaculations
and grimaces!
--
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swiftouch, LTD
Quoth Gilad Ben-Yossef:
> Marc A. Volovic wrote:
> >Quoth Ira Abramov:
> >>Today I installed a similar setup on a faster machine, host is FC4,
> >Not that I am casting the first stone, but anyone using FC as a production
> >machine should have his orchideae removed.
> The Fedora Core line is a non
Marc A. Volovic wrote:
Quoth Ira Abramov:
Today I installed a similar setup on a faster machine, host is FC4,
Not that I am casting the first stone, but anyone using FC as a production
machine should have his orchideae removed.
I wrote an email saying the same thing (although the word "o
pull? Http pull?
etc.
Also - what is the hardware diff between old slow host and new fast host?
Should not cause such a drastic effect, but go figure. Just for the heck of
it, push large ICMP packets (i.e. ping -s, aka ping of death). I rather
suspect the memory bus and its effect on vmware (esp
Quoting Ira Abramov, from the post of Tue, 13 Jun:
>
> also rsync pulls files at a crappy 15-20KB per second from the host to
> the guest, which is a really low speed.
>
> no iptables, AFAIK no traffic shaping. what am I missing?!
oh, for completeness: VMwareTools are installed, I am working wit
Howdie guys!
Last week I installed VMware server for another happy customer. As you
may recall from an earlier post, it's a porting farm, the Host is a
Centos4, and the guessts are RH7.2, 7.3, RHEL3 and another Centos4. all
four VMs mount /home from an NFS export on the host, and all is
On 3/8/06, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you reported this problem on the Kopete bugzilla?
Actually no, but browsing through their site I was reminded that they actually
take the MSN code from AMSN, which is much easier to install (and might even
be the program I confused with Kope
On 3/8/06, Gadi Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's only an unstable alpha driver for my webcam in Linux, which is
When I bought my webcam (Logitech Pro 4000) I made sure it's supported
on Linux :)
> mostly unusable. Since VMware version 5, there is support for iso
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 05:38, Amos Shapira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone here had positive experience running Windows version
> of Skype or MSN massenger under Windows-XP/VMware/Linux(debian)?
>
> Skype is the only VoIP for Linux I managed to use throught my ADSL
&g
Hi
There's only an
unstable alpha driver for my webcam in Linux, which is mostly
unusable. Since VMware version 5, there is support for isochronous USB
devices, and since then, my webcam works flawlessly on Messenger under
Windows XP. I'm running Mandriva Linux but I can't
Hello,
Does anyone here had positive experience running Windows version
of Skype or MSN massenger under Windows-XP/VMware/Linux(debian)?
Skype is the only VoIP for Linux I managed to use throught my ADSL
router NAT and MSN Massenger on Win98 is the only application I managed
to use for webcam
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 12:39:53AM +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> I doubt that we'll see VT/Pacifica going into full swing before 07.
> (Especially on AMDs, as AMD just started to port Xen to support
> Pacifica)
Xen includes SVM support. You need SVM HW which is not generally
available yet, but re
st x86/64bit CPU release (Opteron)
and yet, I doubt that 10% of the world is 64bit based.
I doubt that we'll see VT/Pacifica going into full swing before 07.
(Especially on AMDs, as AMD just started to port Xen to support
Pacifica)
>
> > >From my short experience, Xen is a quite com
ntel x86 architecture is notoriously hard to virtualize,
because of stupid architectural decisions (e.g., doing some
priviledged things in a non-privileged mode does not trap, but rather
fails silently). VMWare gets around this by dynamically rewriting the
executing code (with the obvious p
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote about "Re: VMware for free":
> That's wrong, people have been able to buy VT enabled processos. Even
> if they are scarce, pretty soon (weeks, a few months at most) they'll
> be available everywhere.
For the clueless am
will
> release the 'enabled' version of their Core with VT enabled.
That's wrong, people have been able to buy VT enabled processos. Even
if they are scarce, pretty soon (weeks, a few months at most) they'll
be available everywhere.
> >From my short experience, Xen i
> Last time I checked, with no hardware VT extensions, Xen cannot run
> Windows.
> Am I wrong?
No, Xen does require VT (or AMD's SVM) to run Windows. But VT enabled
processors are now available, and SVM will be available soon.
Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.l
Hi,
I read a bit more. They won't release the GSX product as a freeware,
but actually will release something which will be called "VMWare
Server" which is something quite similar to GSX.
> > So? free is not open. Xen is both (and yes, it can run Windows). I
> > wish VM
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > So? free is not open.Xen is both (and yes, it can run Windows). I
> > wish VMWare would open up the code under a GPL compatible, then we
> > could really have fun :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Muli
>
> Last time
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 13:23 +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:06:10PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > VMWare next week plans to give away VMWare (GSX version, not the WS
> > or ESX).
>
> So? free is not open. Xen is both
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:06:10PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> VMWare next week plans to give away VMWare (GSX version, not the WS
> or ESX).
So? free is not open. Xen is both (and yes, it can run Windows). I
wish VMWare would open up the code under a GPL compatible, t
Hi,
VMWare next week plans to give away VMWare (GSX version, not the WS or ESX).
Link:
http://news.com.com/VMware+to+make+server+product+free/2100-1012_3-6034615.html?tag=nefd.top
Thanks,
Hetz
To unsubscribe,
send mail to [EMAIL
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:21:09AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> It's also a "test bed" for new ideas in emulations, just few weeks
> ago, Fabrice (the genius guy who created QEMU and also wrote FFMPEG
> that almost every Linux and other OS's media player uses these days)
> has committed an intere
On Friday, 6 בJanuary 2006 00:21, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Emulation of up to 255 X86 processors for your guest OS. I don't know
> any OS's that support such a number of CPU's,...
Well, here is one: Linux
http://www.sgi.com/products/servers/altix/
Up to 512 processors (and there's a single experim
1 - 100 of 387 matches
Mail list logo
