Kvm lite is not very interesting.
As for VirtualBox - if you want to run one VM, especially if you are on win
or mac, virtualbox is really cool.
Whenthe amount of VMs is measured in tens, id use KVM.
Gilad
Amos Shapira wrote:
2009/9/16 Arie Skliarouk :
Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 a
Hi,
We developed and support for years now a software product for tech support
centers that uses KVM as a hypervisor.
One installation at Canon in Japan runs 35 concurrent Vista/win2k/xp and
soon Win7 instances.
Each session is about a minute long (it is used by tech support people to
help them
Hi Gilad,
Have you heard of KVM-lite ? (KVM that doesn't require virtualization
features from processor)
In what sense "KVM rocks", do we have any benchmark of KVM versus
VirtualBox ?
I saw a post from Ingo Molnar stating that context number of context
switches in KVM reduced dramatically
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 15:53:10 geoffrey mendelson wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > I've never considered VirtualBox (or VMware, for that matter) for
> > anything except that it's included in Ubuntu for desktop, and it had a
> > very easy interface to setup Wind
How is KVM as a desktop? I mean in VMWare there is a special windows display
driver which makes it look very natural (and resizeable)
For a server I would also support KVM, the only bad thing I have to say
about it is its buggy PXE rom stack.
Ohad
2009/9/16 Gilad Ben-Yossef
> Amos Shapira wro
On Sep 16, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Amos Shapira wrote:
I've never considered VirtualBox (or VMware, for that matter) for
anything except that it's included in Ubuntu for desktop, and it had a
very easy interface to setup Windows quickly.
I saw the reference to libvirt in the RHEL 5.4 announcement and
2009/9/16 Oron Peled :
> On Wednesday, 16 בSeptember 2009 00:24:16 Amos Shapira wrote:
>> Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
>> RH 5.4 is out with KVM "preview tech", I'm not an expert but got the
>> impression that KVM might get things better than Xen eventually
On Wednesday, 16 בSeptember 2009 00:24:16 Amos Shapira wrote:
> Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
> RH 5.4 is out with KVM "preview tech", I'm not an expert but got the
> impression that KVM might get things better than Xen eventually.
If your CPU support virtu
2009/9/16 Gilad Ben-Yossef :
> Don't mean to dis Xen or anyone, but...
>
> You can drop the "eventually". KVM rocks :-)
Care to give more details? Especially compared to Xen?
I googled for "kvm vs. xen" but all the links I found so far talk
about KVM's potential (and are a bit outdated).
A view b
Amos Shapira wrote:
2009/9/16 Arie Skliarouk :
Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
RH 5.4 is out with KVM "preview tech", I'm not an expert but got the
impression that KVM might get things better than Xen eventually.
Don't mean to dis Xen or anyone, b
At
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads
you will see at the top VirtualBox binaries. If you then click on
VirtualBox 3.0.6 for linux hosts link you will get to the link that
Michael mentioned
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads and have the binaries
of your distribution.
Probably u
Try here:http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads
--
Michael Ben-Nes - Internet Consultant and Director.
http://www.epoch.co.il - weaving the Net.
Cellular: 054-4848113
--
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 a
2009/9/16 Arie Skliarouk :
> Hi,
>
> Depends.
> Both Ubuntu and RedHat push KVM as the virtualization solution. IMHO it is
> the fastest from the three. It is also most open one.
Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
RH 5.4 is out with KVM "preview tech", I'm not a
2009/9/16 sara fink :
> you need to have the virtualbox-bin to have support for usb.
Where do you get it? I see only "virtualbox-ose" on Ubuntu 9.04, which is 2.1.4.
On virtualbox.org there are later version 3.0.6 but nothing mentions
"virtualbox-bin".
--Amos
___
I'm using VMPlayer with Ubuntu running windows in a virtual machine and I
didn't need to do anything special to get audio running
I also like it very much that you can resize on the fly the virtual client,
very useful if you need to connect your server to an external beamer for
presentations etc.
Hi,
Depends.
Both Ubuntu and RedHat push KVM as the virtualization solution. IMHO it is
the fastest from the three. It is also most open one.
The free version of VirtualBox has no USB support but has excellent 3D
support, so it is ideal for games.
VMWare is ok, but I don't like it's integration
you need to have the virtualbox-bin to have support for usb.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Amos Shapira wrote:
> 2009/9/15 Michael Ben-Nes :
> > If your primary OS is the Linux one, then I recommend installing it as a
> > host and use VirtualBox ( basically because its so easy to use )
>
> I
on you choose.
>>
>> Rony
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: linux-il-boun...@cs.huji.ac.il [mailto:
>> linux-il-boun...@cs.huji.ac.il]
>> On Behalf Of David Suna
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:53 AM
>> To: linux-il
>> Subject:
inux-il-boun...@cs.huji.ac.il]
> On Behalf Of David Suna
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:53 AM
> To: linux-il
> Subject: Virtualization recommendation
>
> I just bought a new Gateway laptop that comes with Windows Vista (and a
> free upgrade to Windows 7). I want to be able t
9 8:53 AM
To: linux-il
Subject: Virtualization recommendation
I just bought a new Gateway laptop that comes with Windows Vista (and a
free upgrade to Windows 7). I want to be able to run both Linux (Ubuntu
is my preferred distribution) and Windows (Vista for now, Windows 7 in
the futu
On Tuesday 15 September 2009, David Suna wrote:
> I just bought a new Gateway laptop that comes with Windows Vista (and a
> free upgrade to Windows 7). I want to be able to run both Linux (Ubuntu
> is my preferred distribution) and Windows (Vista for now, Windows 7 in
> the future) using virtualiz
ss of the virtualization solution you choose.
Rony
-Original Message-
From: linux-il-boun...@cs.huji.ac.il [mailto:linux-il-boun...@cs.huji.ac.il]
On Behalf Of David Suna
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:53 AM
To: linux-il
Subject: Virtualization recommendation
I just bought a new Gatew
2009/9/15 Michael Ben-Nes :
> If your primary OS is the Linux one, then I recommend installing it as a
> host and use VirtualBox ( basically because its so easy to use )
I used VirtualBox on Ubuntu 32 bit to install Windows XP, just to try
to see if Skype 4 for windows will work - but then discove
If your primary OS is the Linux one, then I recommend installing it as a
host and use VirtualBox ( basically because its so easy to use )
If you intend to play 3D games on win7 then note that it wont work on a
vitalized OS. In my case I just created a separated portion just for win7 /
games.
As fo
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 08:53:23 David Suna wrote:
> I just bought a new Gateway laptop that comes with Windows Vista (and a
> free upgrade to Windows 7). I want to be able to run both Linux (Ubuntu
> is my preferred distribution) and Windows (Vista for now, Windows 7 in
> the future) using v
I have a linux linux installed and have a vmware guest as windows. I
managed to run wifi & sound this way.
what is the purpose of your laptop ?
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 08:53 +0300, David Suna wrote:
> I just bought a new Gateway laptop that comes with Windows Vista (and a
> free upgrade to Windows
On Tuesday 15 September 2009, David Suna wrote:
> I just bought a new Gateway laptop that comes with Windows Vista (and a
> free upgrade to Windows 7). I want to be able to run both Linux (Ubuntu
> is my preferred distribution) and Windows (Vista for now, Windows 7 in
> the future) using virtualiz
I just bought a new Gateway laptop that comes with Windows Vista (and a
free upgrade to Windows 7). I want to be able to run both Linux (Ubuntu
is my preferred distribution) and Windows (Vista for now, Windows 7 in
the future) using virtualization. I have not gotten into virtualization
until
28 matches
Mail list logo
