Re: Uptime vs. security (was: [offtopic] Government and technology)

On Monday 09 February 2009 12:06:27 Ira Abramov wrote: > Quoting Shlomi Fish, from the post of Sat, 07 Feb: > > On Friday 06 February 2009 23:42:54 Ira Abramov wrote: > > > 23:40:21 up 512 days, 9:49, 2 users, load average: 0.89, 0.83, 1.11 > > > > That's a nice uptime. However, weren't there a

Re: Uptime vs. security

Ira Abramov wrote: I am hoping Lenny becomes stable soon, though it could have been cool to have a 550 day uptime :-) Due date is February 14. In 5 days. Shachar ___ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mail

Uptime vs. security (was: [offtopic] Government and technology)

Quoting Shlomi Fish, from the post of Sat, 07 Feb: > On Friday 06 February 2009 23:42:54 Ira Abramov wrote: > > 23:40:21 up 512 days, 9:49, 2 users, load average: 0.89, 0.83, 1.11 > > That's a nice uptime. However, weren't there any newer kernels released since > with important security updat