Thank you.
אורי
u...@speedy.net
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 6:17 AM Shlomo Solomon
wrote:
> BTW - in addition to my previous answer, when I usded the method I
> suggested, I originally made an error and upgraded to a more advanced
> version (5.19.*) that was not supported by Ubuntu. Everything work
BTW - in addition to my previous answer, when I usded the method I
suggested, I originally made an error and upgraded to a more advanced
version (5.19.*) that was not supported by Ubuntu. Everything worked
fine, but I did have a problem with VirtualBox so needed to "downgrade"
to a supported versio
uname -rwill tell you the current version
I currently have 5.15.0-48-generic but do not remeber if that is the
latest (it was a couple of months ago)
To upgrade, the following worked for me, although, for various reasons I
did it a bit differently:
https://linuxhint.com/install-upgrade-linu
Hi,
I have a remote Ubuntu 22.04 server. How do I check which kernel I'm using,
and how do I upgrade the kernel to its latest stable version without
risking the server?
Thanks,
Uri Rodberg, Speedy Net.
אורי
u...@speedy.net
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linu
I have at last upgraded my desktop Debian Linux installation from
Debian Buster to Debian Bullseye.
However, I found that some packages have frightening bugs reported
against them, which do not seem to have been fixed for long time.
Does anyone know if I really need to be afraid of those bugs?
Thanks for coming back with the solution.
Though in a broader perspective: "you are holding it wrong" - get used to
the fact that you are running in the cloud and use it right - learn to
build your images from scratch so you can move to a updated base image and
automatically install and configure
Posting the fix to list, in case someone searches the archives:
Turns out that there were some leftover upstart files in /etc/init/, which
apparently belonged to an old package (lxcguest) which had been uninstalled
but left configured (possibly a remainder from a previous upgrade).
Moving them awa
whoops. Forgot to attach log:
Xen Minimal OS!
start_info: 0xa01000(VA)
nr_pages: 0x26700
shared_inf: 0x7ccbf000(MA)
pt_base: 0xa04000(VA)
nr_pt_frames: 0x9
mfn_list: 0x967000(VA)
mod_start: 0x0(VA)
mod_len: 0
flags: 0x
Hi list,
I have an Ubuntu machine on EC2, which I have been trying to upgrade from
12.04 to 14.04 using the do-release-upgrade command.
This seemed to work well, but when it finally rebooted, it became
unreachable (shows 1/2 checks passed in the EC2 management console, does
not respond to ssh).
I
u 14.04) except some
>> files that I backed up. My questions are:
>>
>> 1. What do we need to do in order for Django to work with Ubuntu 14.04?
>> 2. Why isn't it possible to reinstall Ubuntu 12.04 after upgrading to
>> 14.04 and still keep all the files in my home d
t I backed up. My questions are:
>
> 1. What do we need to do in order for Django to work with Ubuntu 14.04?
> 2. Why isn't it possible to reinstall Ubuntu 12.04 after upgrading to
> 14.04 and still keep all the files in my home directory, while not keeping
> all the other fil
t;> reinstall Ubuntu 12.04 and I lost all the files I had in my home
> > >> directory (because I chose not to keep Ubuntu 14.04) except some
> > >> files that I backed up. My questions are:
> > >>
> > >> 1. What do we need to do in order for Django to wor
n't
> >> work and I couldn't even run migrations (with South). I had to
> >> reinstall Ubuntu 12.04 and I lost all the files I had in my home
> >> directory (because I chose not to keep Ubuntu 14.04) except some
> >> files that I backed up. My questions
in order for Django to work with Ubuntu 14.04?
>> 2. Why isn't it possible to reinstall Ubuntu 12.04 after upgrading to
>> 14.04 and still keep all the files in my home directory, while not keeping
>> all the other files (the operating system files)?
>>
>
not to keep Ubuntu 14.04) except some
> files that I backed up. My questions are:
>
> 1. What do we need to do in order for Django to work with Ubuntu 14.04?
> 2. Why isn't it possible to reinstall Ubuntu 12.04 after upgrading to
> 14.04 and still keep all the files in my hom
d to do in order for Django to work with Ubuntu 14.04?
2. Why isn't it possible to reinstall Ubuntu 12.04 after upgrading to 14.04
and still keep all the files in my home directory, while not keeping all
the other files (the operating system files)?
Thanks,
Uri Even-Chen
Mobile Phone: +972-50-90
On 16 June 2011 19:59, Gadi Cohen wrote:
> **
>
> On 16/06/2011 10:15, Amos Shapira wrote:
>
> Once you go through it with Heimdall the anxiety level drops...:)
>
>
> Haha I can relate to this!
>
> Don't have any solution for the keyboard, unfortunately. (As I mentioned,
> I'm using SlideIT and
On 16/06/2011 10:15, Amos Shapira wrote:
> Once you go through it with Heimdall the anxiety level drops...:)
Haha I can relate to this!
Don't have any solution for the keyboard, unfortunately. (As I
mentioned, I'm using SlideIT and it works great).
Glad Heimdall is getting a good response from
On 14 June 2011 23:35, Gadi Cohen wrote:
> On 13/06/2011 10:49, Amos Shapira wrote:
>
> 1. I lost root after the flash. All links point to GingerBreak but
> multiple attempts didn't work. I now read that someone noticed it's done
> after leaving it for 2.5 hours so I'll try it again - I stopped
On 13/06/2011 10:49, Amos Shapira wrote:
> 1. I lost root after the flash. All links point to GingerBreak but
> multiple attempts didn't work. I now read that someone noticed it's
> done after leaving it for 2.5 hours so I'll try it again - I stopped
> it after letting it run for an hour. If you k
On יום שלישי 07 יוני 2011 22:13:22 Gadi Cohen wrote:
> Right, I finally overcame my fears and successfully flashed my SGS II
> I9100 in Linux yesterday.
I just used the recovery console to install this ZIP:
http://download.cyanogenmod.com/get/cm_galaxysmtd_full-21.zip
I also formatted the sys pa
On 11/05/2011 15:48, Amos Shapira wrote:
> I'm following the forums around it but from what I heard CM7 doesn't
> fully support the SGS yet though this might change soon since Samsung
> released the kernel sources a few weeks ago.
First piece of news is this:
"Samsung Delivers Galaxy S II to Cyan
I'm following the forums around it but from what I heard CM7 doesn't fully
support the SGS yet though this might change soon since Samsung released the
kernel sources a few weeks ago.
Another concern is that the CM7 apparently doesn't add battery or speed on
top of stock 2.3 Android. For this I sa
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 17:08, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> What is NB?
>>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nota_bene
>
Gratias tibi ago!
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
htt
On 06/05/11 15:30, Dotan Cohen wrote:
What is NB?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nota_bene
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting Ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/
On 06/05/2011 15:30, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> 2011/5/6 Gadi Cohen :
>> I must admit, I just used Odin under VirtualBox with a Windows 7 guest... it
>> worked great.
> I thought that the VM could not poll the USB fast enough for this. Did
> you have to mod anything?
Not that I recall, at least not wit
2011/5/6 Gadi Cohen :
> I must admit, I just used Odin under VirtualBox with a Windows 7 guest... it
> worked great.
>
I thought that the VM could not poll the USB fast enough for this. Did
you have to mod anything?
> Also
> ***very NB*** is to make sure that you can get to download mode (vol-up
I must admit, I just used Odin under VirtualBox with a Windows 7
guest... it worked great.
But yeah it looks like you're going in the right direction.
Stock Android does RTL, but it has a bug where numbers are reversed in
RTL, which is a bit unbearable (think phone numbers, dates, bank
balances,
On יום רביעי 04 מאי 2011 18:32:59 Antony Gelberg wrote:
> http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/17020-all-models-cyanogenmod-7-for-samsu
> ng-galaxy-s-phones-experimental/
>
And each time I read about it I keep reading about people complaining that the
Wifi does not always work, and problems with th
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/17020-all-models-cyanogenmod-7-for-samsung-galaxy-s-phones-experimental/
2011/5/4 Amichai Rotman :
> Samsung Galaxy S - not supported...
> Amichai.
>
> 2011/5/4 Noam Meltzer
>>
>> How does it work with Hebrew?
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Antony Gelberg
Samsung Galaxy S - not supported...
Amichai.
2011/5/4 Noam Meltzer
> How does it work with Hebrew?
>
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Antony Gelberg
> wrote:
>
>> If you're inclined, check out the CyanogenMod ROM. Works great for
>> me, much better than (*&%$) carrier-branded firmware.
>>
It's great. In fact I first got involved with it as I bought my phone
in London and it was the only way I could see to get Ivrit. The
support in CM7 is significantly better than in CM6.
Let me know if you have any more questions, although apart from
installing it and using it, I'm not much of a
How does it work with Hebrew?
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> If you're inclined, check out the CyanogenMod ROM. Works great for
> me, much better than (*&%$) carrier-branded firmware.
>
> http://www.cyanogenmod.com/
>
> Tony
>
>
> 2011/5/4 Amichai Rotman :
> > Hi all,
>
If you're inclined, check out the CyanogenMod ROM. Works great for
me, much better than (*&%$) carrier-branded firmware.
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/
Tony
2011/5/4 Amichai Rotman :
> Hi all,
> I recently switched from Nokia N97 to Samsung Galaxy S GT-I9000. It came
> with Orange's ROM (Based on
Hi all,
I recently switched from Nokia N97 to Samsung Galaxy S GT-I9000. It came
with Orange's ROM (Based on Android 2.2).
It is lightning fast compared to my "old" N97, but still - it hangs and has
a bunch of Apps I do not need or like...
I'd like to upgrade it to version 2.3.3 (Gingerbread). C
Hi,
I wouldn't start with upgrading from Ubuntu to Debian, it will get
messy. Just upgrading from Debian stable to testing is a big headache
and usually will break the system.
It is much easier and quicker to net install a new Debian.
As to upgrading two systems, just install the first, and
system, so not brain surgery either.
If you decide to go the CD/DVD route, it doesn't matter how you
download. Jigdo will not give you more up to date image than the latest
ISO. You can use jigdo in combination with apt-proxy, so it is not
totally useless (I always use jigdo for downloads, mo
I am currently running Ubuntu 9.04. I am fed up with it. I want to
replace it with debian, hopefully without wiping the hard drive in the
process.
I looked around and found an Israeli mirror but there are something
like 31 cd's or 5 dvd's and updates. Is there a simple way to upgrade
it i
Thanks for all your help. In the end I decided to do what I should have
done, had I RTFM'ed. I was trying to upgrade a KnoppMyth system
(MythTV integrated into a Knoppix system) by doing a debian upgrade.
BAD IDEA.
It seems there is a newer version of KnoppMyth based on Etch instead of
Sarge and
r's story:
1. Carefully and patiently go through the first screen you see after hitting
"g" ("go") in aptitude and make sure you like what you see, so you'll catch
any nasty surprises before they actually happen.
2. When upgrading between major releases, I've seen
Quoting Omer Zak, from the post of Sat, 12 May:
> I have at last upgraded my desktop PC from Debian Sarge to Debian Etch.
> At one stage, the aptitude package was removed. But I used dselect to
> re-install it and so could proceed with installation.
>
> Moral: avoid marking packages as automatic
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 10:23 +0300, Omer Zak wrote:
> 2. YouTube works erratically for me. After upgrade, YouTube did not
> work. I re-installed Maromedia flash player version 9 (the .tar.gz file
> was unchanged since previous update). YouTube worked. But today
> YouTube again does not work.
> I
I have at last upgraded my desktop PC from Debian Sarge to Debian Etch.
At one stage, the aptitude package was removed. But I used dselect to
re-install it and so could proceed with installation.
Moral: avoid marking packages as automatic in aptitude, unless you
really need them only when another
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:20:31 +0300, Noam Meltzer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Recently, we decided to upgrade the samba server at our office from samba2
> to samba3. If this were a modern Linux installation, we wouldn't have so
> many obstacles in our way. But since we are using Solaris9 on our server, we
>
Hi,Recently, we decided to upgrade the samba server at our office from samba2 to samba3. If this were a modern Linux installation, we wouldn't have so many obstacles in our way. But since we are using Solaris9 on our server, we faced some ugly quirks.
So here's the story, and the solution. If anybo
On 11/06/06, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 10:23 +0200, Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> Are you quite sure this is necessary?
> In debian, you just 'apt-get upgrade' can't you immitate it with RH?
That's possibly the main reason Debian takes so long to release a new
vers
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:45:37PM +0300, Ancient1 wrote:
> If I may intrude , I'd like to point out that you may be confusing
> Motherboard design with sound sampling . the FlyVideo is a PCI card and
> PCI defaults to 33Mhz and of course PCI card. If you are not mistaken
> but its me , than up
ציטוט Geoffrey S. Mendelson:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:35:27AM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
I don't believe the OSS emulation is ALSA is using 32KHz. I'm not sure
if its a fixed rate, but on my computer it seems to be using 48KHz
(which makes much more sense - sound cards work with either 44.1K
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 10:47 +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: Upgrading live RH9":
> > As mentioned before- upgrading RedHat/Fedora is not a recommended
> > practice
>
> I'm not sure anyone said that. Upgrading
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: Upgrading live RH9":
> As mentioned before- upgrading RedHat/Fedora is not a recommended
> practice
I'm not sure anyone said that. Upgrading Fedora is not only recommended
practice, it is the only sensible practice: I'
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:35:27AM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
> I don't believe the OSS emulation is ALSA is using 32KHz. I'm not sure
> if its a fixed rate, but on my computer it seems to be using 48KHz
> (which makes much more sense - sound cards work with either 44.1KHz or
> 48KHz).
Yes, except t
repository and
works flawlessly - the sound module was set up to "default", but
changing it to whatever value (arts, esd, oss, alsa, sdl) worked. I've
finally left it as "default" (not sure what is picks).
As mentioned before- upgrading RedHat/Fedora is not a recommended
pr
repository and
works flawlessly - the sound module was set up to "default", but
changing it to whatever value (arts, esd, oss, alsa, sdl) worked. I've
finally left it as "default" (not sure what is picks).
As mentioned before- upgrading RedHat/Fedora is not a recommended
pr
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:25:44PM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean - are you talking about OSS vs. ALSA ? Fedore
> Core 5 supports OSS using the OSS-ALSA emulation layer which works fine
> for me. More then that - Fedora Core 5 supports dmix/dsnoop out of the
> box, and works
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 17:00 +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Under FC4 it worked perfectly. Under FC5, there is no sound. It turns out
> that VLC uses the old sound system, while the latest kernel does not
> support it properly.
I'm not sure what you mean - are you talking about OSS vs. ALSA
Are you quite sure this is necessary?In debian, you just 'apt-get upgrade' can't you immitate it with RH?On 6/11/06, Oded Arbel <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 19:42 -0700, E Leibovich wrote:
Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
programs (for instance
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 04:33:44PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> Don't.
> I mean it.
> I saw many Fedora/Debian/Slackware/ users who tried a
> live update and ended up with dead OS on their hands.
> Especially if you can't really fix the machine is something goes bad.
Don't is a good way to put it
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 19:42 -0700, E Leibovich wrote:
> Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
> programs (for instance openACS) and which runs RH9.
> How would you upgrade it with minimal downtime?
> 1) Is upgrading to Fedora advisable? It seems it'd
> cause
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 09:51 +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2006, E Leibovich wrote about "Upgrading live RH9":
> > Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
> > programs (for instance openACS) and which runs RH9.
> > How would you upg
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 10:23 +0200, Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> Are you quite sure this is necessary?
> In debian, you just 'apt-get upgrade' can't you immitate it with RH?
As mentioned before - Nope.
Its not an inherent weakness of RPM based distros - if that's what you
were thinking - I have succe
--=-ekMODUnqMt3psXrhMux9
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 19:42 -0700, E Leibovich wrote:
> Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
> programs (for instance openACS) and which runs RH9.
> How would you upgrade it with minimal downtime?
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006, E Leibovich wrote about "Upgrading live RH9":
> Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
> programs (for instance openACS) and which runs RH9.
> How would you upgrade it with minimal downtime?
> 1) Is upgrading to Fedora advisable? It seems
Given a live server that runs many relatively uncommon
programs (for instance openACS) and which runs RH9.
How would you upgrade it with minimal downtime?
1) Is upgrading to Fedora advisable? It seems it'd
cause less headache, since configuration files are
equal, however it doesn't
Hi,
It's almost time to update my DVD player. I am looking at the following
types of units:
1. DVD player with MP4 support. This is the cheapest option, about 400 NIS.
The main disadvantge is that every time I want to use it to watch
something I need to burn it to a CD or DVD.
The adv
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:00:18AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:16:07AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:32:47PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:47:22PM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:30, M
e. I guess that a clean install
> > would be the smartest choice here.
> >
> > I am looking for the path of least resistance here, its not a job, just
> > something I know how to do.
>
> It seems that upgrading would cause more problems than re-installation.
> I w
distros only if I need to do a clean install to
> save me the time of learning a new one. I guess that a clean install
> would be the smartest choice here.
>
> I am looking for the path of least resistance here, its not a job, just
> something I know how to do.
It seems that upgra
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:47:22PM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:30, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
>
> I guess you mean a *new* version of apache, ssh etc. Otherwise you could
> simply install the original RH
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 19:38, William Sherwin wrote:
> Oron Peled wrote:
> > 100Mb should be more than enough for many kernels + their initrd and
> > symtabs.
>
> Why would anyone ever need 100 MB for a /boot partition? Mine is 16 MB -
> and only 3.5 MB of it is used...
Indeed ~20MB should b
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> You can do a clean install . But first: is there any existing data
> outside of /home ? Any simple way of backing it up and restoring?
If you have something like PartitionMagic, you can create a new partition called
/backup and store tarballs of user accounts and other neede
Oron Peled wrote:
> 100Mb should be more than enough for many kernels + their initrd and
> symtabs.
Why would anyone ever need 100 MB for a /boot partition? Mine is 16 MB - and
only 3.5 MB of it is used... Also, I don't see why the root partition would
need to be so large, as root doesn't usual
sion can use rpm4's database format. This can help
with an upgrade to RH7.1 and maybe 7.2 and 7.3
- if you upgrade to rh>=9 , the rpm package there has changed and is
no longer statically linked. The statically linked rpm will fail
with the new glibc. Fun.
glibc:
if upgr
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 17:30, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
I guess you mean a *new* version of apache, ssh etc. Otherwise you could
simply install the original RH-6.2 RPMS.
> Anyway, is it possible to upgrade it in place to red-hat
home is
> ok, but why does boot need 1.5 GB ?)
>
> Thanks
I suggest you found out what the system is currently used for.
Red Hat 6.2 is a distribution several prorietary software vendors got
stuck with for quite some time. You may find yourself upgrading the
system, and them realizing that
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Micha Feigin wrote:
I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
started working on it, but it seems a real pain since it doesn't seem
to be supported and compiling from source requires me to get quite a
few packages to compile.
Anyway, is it possible
I was just asked to install apache, ssh etc. on a red-hat 6.2 system. I
started working on it, but it seems a real pain since it doesn't seem
to be supported and compiling from source requires me to get quite a
few packages to compile.
Anyway, is it possible to upgrade it in place to red-hat 7/9/f
Hi,
I have a machine installed with SuSE 9.0. KDE 3.1.4 and everything was fine.
After upgrading to KDE 3.2.3 using the binary package for SuSE 9.0, I
now get an error message every time I login, or try to use an
application that uses aRTs for sound (most KDE apps).
Applications that uses sound
Hi. Wanted to thks all the wonderful oppinions. Except for a lone
adventurous admin, it seems I'll be installing a new server soon, and
transferring all files there. Alas, the Microsoft world on upgrading a
production server is equal.
Funny no one suggested me to prepare a mirror server an
Oded Arbel wrote:
× 11 × 2004, 04:24, ×× ××× Gad:
I've managed to play around with the fonts and I discovered that the
font I was using (Ann) probably doesn't have a UTF8 version, so it was
displaying as gibberish.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC fonts do not have a "utf-8 ve
× 11 × 2004, 04:24, ×× ××× Gad:
> I've managed to play around with the fonts and I discovered that the
> font I was using (Ann) probably doesn't have a UTF8 version, so it was
> displaying as gibberish.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC fonts do not have a "utf-8 version" or a
"
Shlomi Loubaton wrote:
Gad wrote:
Hi,
I've got Debian unstable and I've tried upgrading KDE from 3.1.3 to
3.1.4, using apt-get.
All went well, except that when KDE starts almost all of the fonts are
in gibberish and some letters don't display at all. Only mozilla seems
t
Gad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got Debian unstable and I've tried upgrading KDE from 3.1.3 to
> 3.1.4, using apt-get.
>
> All went well, except that when KDE starts almost all of the fonts are
> in gibberish and some letters don't display at all. Only mozilla seems
&
Hi,
I've got Debian unstable and I've tried upgrading KDE from 3.1.3 to
3.1.4, using apt-get.
All went well, except that when KDE starts almost all of the fonts are
in gibberish and some letters don't display at all. Only mozilla seems
to be working ok.
Searching the net h
th files are from package glibc-2.2.93-5).
>
> My questions:
> 1. Does the above mean that I have to upgrade to package
> glibc-2.3.2-whatever?
> 2. If yes, does anyone have experience upgrading RedHat 8.0
> installation like this?How risky would this be?
>
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> rpmfind (http://rpmfind.net) is basically a search engine for packages.
> In it you can find packages from many sources. Currently I can't find
> those packages. Try, e.g, a search for "mozilla-chat" of architecture
> i386:
> http://www.rpmfind.net/linux
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Omer Zak wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Omer Zak wrote:
> >
> >>I downloaded the following RPMs:
> >
> >>From where? What source exactly?
> >
> I located the packages using http://www.rpmfind.com/, and downloaded
> them from whatever default server rpmfi
to upgrade to package
>glibc-2.3.2-whatever?
> 2. If yes, does anyone have experience upgrading RedHat 8.0
>installation like this? How risky would this be?
As you are already using a 2.3 pre-release, I suspect a glibc upgrade won't be
too traumatic.
I personally upgrade g
yes, does anyone have experience upgrading RedHat 8.0
installation like this? How risky would this be?
8.0 to 9.0? Not exactly trivial. If it is just for mozilla, it is probably
not worth it. My bet is that rebuilding the mozilla SRPM would prove
easier.
The big change is the different
y Linux installation are:
> /lib/libpthread-0.10.so
> /lib/libc-2.2.93.so
> (according to rpm -qf, both files are from package glibc-2.2.93-5).
>
> My questions:
> 1. Does the above mean that I have to upgrade to package
>glibc-2.3.2-whatever?
> 2. If yes, does anyone hav
:
> > /lib/libpthread-0.10.so
> > /lib/libc-2.2.93.so
> > (according to rpm -qf, both files are from packageglibc-2.2.93-5).
> >
> > My questions:
> > 1. Does the above mean that I have to upgrade to package
> > glibc-2.3.2-whatever?
> > 2. If yes,
-whatever?
2. If yes, does anyone have experience upgrading RedHat 8.0
installation like this? How risky would this be?
Thanks,
--- Omer
My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine alone.
They do not
check on www.pclinuxonline.com check for texar rpms
he has very good kde rpms for mdk 9.1 along which other rpms
which he maintain.
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Amichai Rotman wrote:
> Hi Clan,
>
> I am running KDE 3.1 on MDK 9.1. I would like to
On Monday, September 01, 2003 20:06, you wrote:
> todo: tell how to setup urpmi to use this
Put this in a console window, as root. It should be entered in one long line.
urpmi.addmedia --update -h TexStar
http://iglu.org.il/pub/distributions/texstar/mandrake/9.1/rpms/
After it finishes, go to:
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> * there are a suspend option now (did not test it myself yet)
swsusp was in Mandrake 9.1 as well: it was used as the default suspend
method if you had ACPI, and for APM, you can add SWSUSP_FORCE_SUSPEND="0 2"
to /etc/sysconfig/suspend.
The only bug was that by default, o
On Monday, Sep 1, 2003, at 17:08 Asia/Jerusalem, Amichai Rotman wrote:
Any one with a lead to those RPMs?
Sure. They are available to Mandrake Club users. Support Mandrake, buy
a membership, download the latest KDE for Mandrake 9.1 and many other
packages if you like.
Oh, you meant something fr
I can suggest using the Texstar rpms. They are damm good, and contain a few
things not even in head currently.
And you can fetch them from iglu as well.
http://iglu.org.il/pub/distributions/texstar/mandrake/9.1/rpms/
todo: tell how to setup urpmi to use this
Anyway:
cooker IS mdk9.2 right now
On Monday 01 September 2003 14:37, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Monday 01 September 2003 17:08, Amichai Rotman wrote:
> > Hi Clan,
> >
> > I am running KDE 3.1 on MDK 9.1. I would like to upgrade to the latest
> > version (according to ftp://ftp.kde.org it's 3.1.2) but I can't find any
> > pre-built RPMs
I can't find
> > > > any pre-built RPMs for Mandrake.
> > >
> > > The latest version is 3.1.3, and Mandrake has pre-built RPMs for that
> > > version (including some CVS fixes) on their cooker repository. go to the
> > > Mandrake web site and u
t; > The latest version is 3.1.3, and Mandrake has pre-built RPMs for that
> > version (including some CVS fixes) on their cooker repository. go to the
> > Mandrake web site and under "Developers" click on "cooker".
>
> But this means upgrading half the
(including some CVS fixes) on their cooker repository. go to the Mandrake web
> site and under "Developers" click on "cooker".
But this means upgrading half the system to cooker. And also means that
you have to chase cooker to keep on track with security updates, right?
Is it r
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
