Re: The bullshit of upstream/downstream ratio (was: Re: ADSL questions)

2000-12-22 Thread Dani Arbel
x10 is what the providors plan to. With the prices of ATM connections (required to connect the ISP to Bezeq), they will not have enough b/w for more, once the ADSL becomes more spread out. Dani On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Shlomi Fish wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Dani Arbel wrote: > > > True. I yet ha

Re: The bullshit of upstream/downstream ratio (was: Re: ADSL questions)

2000-12-21 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Dani Arbel wrote: > True. I yet have to find the videophone for Linux ... > Bezeq do not commit to any service, and reduced their claim from x300 > speed to x10 speed. do not expect to do real videoconf with ADSL (and your > lower limit for REAL good video conf will be 720 Kb

Re: The bullshit of upstream/downstream ratio (was: Re: ADSL questions)

2000-12-19 Thread Dani Arbel
True. I yet have to find the videophone for Linux ... Bezeq do not commit to any service, and reduced their claim from x300 speed to x10 speed. do not expect to do real videoconf with ADSL (and your lower limit for REAL good video conf will be 720 Kbs). Dani On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Omer Zak wrote:

The bullshit of upstream/downstream ratio (was: Re: ADSL questions)

2000-12-15 Thread Omer Zak
There is a cretain application (which is important to hearing impaired), for which all the intricate and convoluted calculations of d/l:u/l ratios are completely irrelevant: VIDEOPHONES This application is characterized by d/l:u/l ratio of 1:1. For people who need t