On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Daniel Feiglin wrote:
> Well, I was curious enough to click on your source code site and here is wahat I
> got:
>
> Forbidden
>
> You don't have permission to access /~shlomif/fcs/ on this server.
>
> Ho hum.
>
> Dan Feiglin
>
Well, sorry about that, but apparently t2 d
>
> I noticed that the program that uses the chars representation
> runs much
> faster than the int/short based program. For 100 given initial boards,
> it finished them in 11 minutes and 12 seconds. The wider program took
> more than 19 minutes when it was terminated in the middle of board No.
Well, I was curious enough to click on your source code site and here is wahat I
got:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /~shlomif/fcs/ on this server.
Ho hum.
Dan Feiglin
Shlomi Fish wrote:
> This is slightly off-topic but I thought it may be of interest to the
> list.
>
> I wrot
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> The question is why the wide-integer based program is slower because
> obviously my Pentium 166 MHz processor takes less time for 32-bit or
> 16-bit integer computations and memory access than for 8-bit
> ones. My best guess so far is that the majority of
This is slightly off-topic but I thought it may be of interest to the
list.
I wrote a program that automatically solves Freecell games. For those
who are not familiar with it, Freecell is a card game, in which there
are several stacks which should be moved to the decks with the aid of
freecells
