On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 12:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About the WaitForMultipleObjects on Linux - it indeed looked like a useful
> thing back in the NT 3.51 days, except that it didn't work for Socket handles
> and the limit of 64 objects was annoying (had to accomodate for unlimited
> n
Hi,
About the WaitForMultipleObjects on Linux - it indeed looked like a useful
thing back in the NT 3.51 days, except that it didn't work for Socket handles
and the limit of 64 objects was annoying (had to accomodate for unlimited
number of threads and file handles).
You might want to look at the
