On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > I'm rather confused at the moment. Does this kernel contain the new
> > Virtual Memory manager from Andrea Archangeli or does it use the
> > original VM that was present in the older 2.4.x releases?
>
> The new one. Old one is deprecated officially (l
> I'm rather confused at the moment. Does this kernel contain the new
> Virtual Memory manager from Andrea Archangeli or does it use the
> original VM that was present in the older 2.4.x releases?
The new one. Old one is deprecated officially (look at Redhat's Rawhide
kernel - 2.4.16)
> I know
> i find your use of 2.4.18pre3-ac2 and 'stable' in the same sentance
> amusing, if a bit oxymoronic, since that kernel has been out for all of
> two days. maybe it does beautifully under stress, but what if it has a
> hidden bug that causes it to degrade over time, so that in a week it's
> unusab
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi People,
>
> After much more stress tests with the new VM (36 hours tests and rapid emails
> swapping) I'm happy to announce:
>
> Kernel 2.4.17 + Marcello's pre3 + Alan Cox ac2 patch = kernel 2.4.18-pre3-ac2
> is the the most stable tests with the new
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Kernel 2.4.17 + Marcello's pre3 + Alan Cox ac2 patch = kernel
> 2.4.18-pre3-ac2 is the the most stable tests with the new VM, after
> 12 hours of heavy stress testing (tests include: parallel compiling
> X + KDE + running OpenGL demos + live file system
Hi People,
After much more stress tests with the new VM (36 hours tests and rapid emails
swapping) I'm happy to announce:
Kernel 2.4.17 + Marcello's pre3 + Alan Cox ac2 patch = kernel 2.4.18-pre3-ac2
is the the most stable tests with the new VM, after 12 hours of heavy stress
testing (tests i
