"Omer Zak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Replying to myself, because I forgot one more point:
> From what I remember about C++, you need also a copy constructor in this
> case,
In this case a copy constructor is not invoked.
> because you strive to copy a value to
Replying to myself, because I forgot one more point:
>From what I remember about C++, you need also a copy constructor in this
case, because you strive to copy a value to a variable (and in this
special case, the value is a constant instance of a class).
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Omer Zak wrote:
>
>
>
