hi,
i setted up send mail with default configuration from mandrake 7 release.
the mail works fine but there is small problem..
when users try to pull mail its not working so i did telnet to port 110 and
what i get is: trying to connect xx.xx.xx.xx...
when i do it from localhost it works fine.
the
Evgeny is right - Use either qmail or Exim which both support maildir
format instead of the outdated mailbox format. That's what we use. We have
huge inboxes and no performance problems.
Regards,
- yba
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Evgeny Zemlerub wrote:
> IMHO (and lot's of other people) sendmail is
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Ariel Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
>
> > Why? should I divide the linux-kernel to multiple folders so that
> > searches will be less easy? There is no problem with 200MB or 20GB
> > databases.
>
> A text mailbox is not a database. Try to remember
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
> Why? should I divide the linux-kernel to multiple folders so that
> searches will be less easy? There is no problem with 200MB or 20GB
> databases.
A text mailbox is not a database. Try to remember that not all imap and
pop servers know how to deal with
> AFAIK, imapd copies the mailbox, not sendmail/procmail. Both qpopper and
> imapd can be configured to copy the mailbox aside, deal with it, and then
> replace it.
That's what I said. But if the daemon access a maildir rather than a
mailbox, no copying should occur.
> 1). Handling 200MB of mai
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
AFAIK, imapd copies the mailbox, not sendmail/procmail. Both qpopper and
imapd can be configured to copy the mailbox aside, deal with it, and then
replace it.
1). Handling 200MB of mailbox is utterly stupid, no one should be keeping
a mailbox this s
IMHO (and lot's of other people) sendmail is "outdated".
There is so called "Second Generation MTA" like qmail, postfix, exim.
My favorite is qmail. On of the nice things about it, it's that he
makes use of so called maildir format. Instaed of storing all the
messages in one big mailbox, each mes
> I have encountered a huge drawback of Sendmail (or the default imap daemon
> of RedHat). I use imap to access the e-mail box of mails that are handled by
> Sendmail. Since the mailbox is plain text file and not some kind of database
> it takes a long time to delete or edit messages. For example
Dubrovsky
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 4:50 PM
To: Oved Blass
Subject: Re: Sendmail problems with large mailboxes
I have much bigger mailboxes & folders with no problem
Check your client and network configuration - backresolving issues
can slow things down considerably , so can a bad netw
I have encountered a huge drawback of Sendmail (or the default imap daemon
of RedHat). I use imap to access the e-mail box of mails that are handled by
Sendmail. Since the mailbox is plain text file and not some kind of database
it takes a long time to delete or edit messages. For example, for 200
Pavel Bibergal wrote:
> Hi all
> I changed the name of my machine, and not the sendmail don't want to
> work..
> how to fix it?
By changing the cf file
By reading the sendmail operator's manual
By reading the sendmail book
By not solving it but claiming that it is solved
=
Hi all
I changed the name of my machine, and not the sendmail don't want to
work..
how to fix it?
--
Pavel Bibergal
"The Right Honorable Gentleman is indebted to his memory for his jests
and to his imagination for his facts."
-- Sheridan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Pardon me? Do you mean you prepared the /etc/virtusertable plain text
> >file
> >and that's all? Sure, you have to produce a db out of it (and this _is_
> >documented correctly :)). E.g.:
> >makemap btree /etc/virtusertable.db < /etc/vi
-- Original Message --
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Pardon me? Do you mean you prepared the /etc/virtusertable plain text
>file
>and that's all? Sure, you have to produce a db out of it (and this _is_
>documented correctly :)). E.g.:
>makemap btree /etc/virtusertable.db < /etc/vi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >2. Make sure the cw parameter (or Fw file) contains betalfa.org.il,
> >mail.betalfa.org.il and test.co.il
> right. that fixed the looping error problem .
Nice. BTW, the docs @sendmail.org are wrong about this issue - it's written
there only the MX domain should be
-- Original Message --
>Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have two domain names. I want to run them both using the same
>machine,
>> and the same sendmail using virtual user table. I configured it,
>into the
>> CF file, and got no error messages during the process,
Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a small problem with sendmail (or is it my problem ?).
> I have to domain names. I want to run them both using the same machine,
> and the same sendmail using virtual user table. I configured it, into the
> CF file, and got no error messages duri
Hi all..
I have a small problem with sendmail (or is it my problem ?).
I have to domain names. I want to run them both using the same machine,
and the same sendmail using virtual user table. I configured it, into the
CF file, and got no error messages during the process, or while sendmail
restart
18 matches
Mail list logo
