configure it so that PHP can send out
> > > mail. The default seems to be to install sendmail. However, I have
> > > seen comments that sendmail is overkill and some references to
> > > ssmtp.
> >
> > The main difference is that ssmtp and nullmailer
efault seems to be to install sendmail. However, I have
> > seen comments that sendmail is overkill and some references to
> > ssmtp.
>
> The main difference is that ssmtp and nullmailer (and other similar
> "sendmails") don't queue. This greatly simplifies them.
&
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 02:44:00PM +0200, David Suna wrote:
> I have an Ubuntu machine that I am using to develop PHP based web
> application. I now need to configure it so that PHP can send out mail. The
> default seems to be to install sendmail. However, I have seen comments that
>
Why not Postfix?
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, 14:45 David Suna, wrote:
> I have an Ubuntu machine that I am using to develop PHP based web
> application. I now need to configure it so that PHP can send out mail.
> The default seems to be to install sendmail. However, I have seen
> comments t
In the debian world a machine used to ship with exim4, Ubuntu Server
prefers postfix afaik but sendmail is also available through apt.
Basically there's a ton of SMTP servers out there and you'll have to
do that very hard thing: choose ;)
A lot has been written comparing them and all o
I have an Ubuntu machine that I am using to develop PHP based web
application. I now need to configure it so that PHP can send out mail.
The default seems to be to install sendmail. However, I have seen
comments that sendmail is overkill and some references to ssmtp.
What would be the
The default config provided by most distros (Fedora in my case)
> is pretty sane, so there is very little to change.
>
> 2. I always customized sendmail.mc and not submit.mc, but maybe
> it's because I'm using full sendmail as my mail-hub for my
> internal network. Maybe I
4.
The default config provided by most distros (Fedora in my case)
is pretty sane, so there is very little to change.
2. I always customized sendmail.mc and not submit.mc, but maybe
it's because I'm using full sendmail as my mail-hub for my
internal network. Maybe I should swit
RELAY
> Connect:127.0.0.1 RELAY
> Connect:10.50.0.2 RELAY
>
>
> After restarting the sendmail , can you see way the relaying is denied in
> you'r log file (maillog) ?
>
>
> - doron
>
>
> i copied the file from you,
changed the Authinfo l
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 12:35 +0300, Erez D wrote:
> hi
>
> i am using bezeqint as my relay host.
>
> i edit my submit.cf and added:
> DSout.bezeqint.net
>
> however i get "Relaying denied", so i need to add authentication.
>
> anybody knows how ?
>
hi
i am using bezeqint as my relay host.
i edit my submit.cf and added:
DSout.bezeqint.net
however i get "Relaying denied", so i need to add authentication.
anybody knows how ?
please do not reply "sendmail is bad, or switch to other MTA&
On 05/03/07, Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Amos,
I don't know how to answer your question inside Sendmail.
Hi Jonathan, sorry for getting back so late - very limited access to GMail
in the last couple of weeks.
I would opt for a (simple and dirty) solution
Hi Amos,
I don't know how to answer your question inside Sendmail.
I would opt for a (simple and dirty) solution outside of Sendmail using a
milter script in Perl that checks disk space and returns a "service
temporarily unavailable" error in the event that there is no space lef
Hello,
I'd like to configure sendmail to discard messages if it runs out of disk space.
By "discard" I mean that I want it to just completely delete the
message and forget about it.
The current situation is that if it runs out of disk space then it
keep filling the disk
Hello,
I am trying to integrate bogofilter-1.1.1 with sendmail-8.12.
I want to filter all messages by running bogofilter as
an unprivileged user.
What can I do in this situation ?
Upgrading sendmail is not an option, I can not use bogom-1.9
sendmail milter.
bogofilter-milter.pl uses
"Hetz Ben Hamo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can do a simple 2 line script to do this and put it in my crontab,
> but I'm looking for a better way that upon receiving the email by the
> Linux machime, that it should run my little script so it will feed the
> text directly and not after X minute
x.org/aliases.5.html
I'd expect something like:
aliasofyourpostingscript: |/usr/local/sbin/your-script
To do the trick, but I don't have sendmail or postfix on my current machine to
test this for you.
Cheers,
--Amos
--
"I was being prosecuted for my beliefs I believed people wouldn
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
I can do a simple 2 line script to do this and put it in my crontab,
but I'm looking for a better way that upon receiving the email by the
Linux machime, that it should run my little script so it will feed the
text directly and not after X minutes...
Tr
Hi people,
Maybe someone had this issue and solve it, so here goes..
I installed WordPress 2 on my machine, everything works ok.
One feature of WordPress is to allow posting by email (you send an
email to a designated address that you specify on your server, and it
will be posted on your blog). H
Hi people,
I have a problem with sendmail configuration: My sendmail server is
configured to relay local domains. I want to change it, but I didn't
find how. I think it's called relay_local_from, but I don't know how to
remove it. Do you have any idea? If you want to see the s
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:05:58AM +0300, Larry Weisberg wrote:
> I need to use the Milter architecture in order to scan and possibly
> modify incoming emails. If someone can suggest a better solution then
> Milter - I am all ears. If not I would appreciate some
> sendmail-Milter
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:05:58AM +0300, Larry Weisberg wrote:
> (I am reposting a previous post with some additional requirements)
>
> I am currently working on a SendMail Milter application. I am looking
> for anyone who has significant experience with performance tuning of
>
(I am reposting a previous post with some additional requirements)
I am currently working on a SendMail Milter application. I am looking
for anyone who has significant experience with performance tuning of
Sendmail+Milter, who might be interested in a few hours of consulting
work?
I need to use
Thanks.
On 7/31/05, Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Larry Weisberg, from the post of Sun, 31 Jul:
> > Is there a mailing list (other than this list) to post questions about
> > performance tuning of sendmail? Alternatively, is there anyone out
>
>
Quoting Larry Weisberg, from the post of Sun, 31 Jul:
> Is there a mailing list (other than this list) to post questions about
> performance tuning of sendmail? Alternatively, is there anyone out
I'd google for it, and try sendmail.org actually...
> there who has significant e
Is there a mailing list (other than this list) to post questions about
performance tuning of sendmail? Alternatively, is there anyone out
there who has significant experience with performance tuning of
Sendmail (preferrably on Debian) who might be interested in a few
hours of consulting work
cific hostnames.) maybe it can
be achived using a script. Can't remember.
Noam
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Folks,
I have a server running sendmail and a few mailman mailing lists. The
server, originally named foo, now has a DNS alias bar, i.e. it answers
to both
foo.snafu.com
and
bar.snafu.com
Folks,
I have a server running sendmail and a few mailman mailing lists. The
server, originally named foo, now has a DNS alias bar, i.e. it answers
to both
foo.snafu.com
and
bar.snafu.com
I want the server to masquerade the mailing lists as either coming
from foo.snafu.com or bar.snafu.com
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 07:50:42PM +0200, Israel Shikler wrote:
> Hi List ,
>
>I am using sendmail on RH AS 3.0 (rich text, Html) .
sendmail is a program that routes mail messages and delivers them to
mailboxes. The program that serves them from the mailbox to the client
is not se
On Monday 14 February 2005 19:50, Israel Shikler wrote:
> Hi List ,
>
>I am using sendmail on RH AS 3.0 (rich text, Html) .
>
>for some reason the people who get it on outlook express claims the HTML
> comes as html code an not as a message.
>
>What am I doing w
Hi List ,
I am using sendmail on RH AS 3.0 (rich text, Html) .
for some reason the people who get it on outlook express claims the HTML
comes as html code an not as a message.
What am I doing wrong?
Israel Shikler
Softkol Software Services
Phone : 972-3-5348938
Fax : 972-3-5348938
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote about "Re: Sendmail issue":
>
> Hi Israel,
>
> First thing first - your email program is sending along a header with
> your message that asks other people mailing programs to send you an
> email when they have read the
ssage -
From: "Gilad Ben-Yossef" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "softkol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Sendmail issue
>
> Hi Israel,
>
> First thing first - your email program is sending al
softkol wrote:
>
> Having software that uses LINUX sendmail command, However my Linux is not
> installed as a mail server.
>
> Instead I would like SENDMAIL to send mail via Netvision smtp gateway
> server.
>
> Is that possible?
>
> What should be modif
send emails to mailing lists, such as Linux-il.
So please, if you're going to stay on this list, please learn how to
make your email program behave itself.
softkol wrote:
I am new to Linux.
What should be done to accomplish the following Using REDHAT.
Having software that uses LINU
Hi Falks,
I am new to Linux.
What should be done to accomplish the following Using REDHAT.
Having software that uses LINUX sendmail command, However my Linux is not
installed as a mail server.
Instead I would like SENDMAIL to send mail via Netvision smtp gateway server.
Is that
Amir Spivak wrote:
Hi all,
I have installed Fedora core 1 on my workstation, with obviously comes
sendmail, when i came to configure
the macro file(/etc/mail/sendmail.mc) and "compile" it with the m4
program it looked for the sendmail-cf package
in /usr/share, a package which appare
e -
From: "Oleg Goldshmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Amir Spivak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: Sendmail-cf package
> "Amir Spivak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have installed Fedora core
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 10:19, Amir Spivak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have installed Fedora core 1 on my workstation, with obviously comes sendmail,
> when i came to configure
> the macro file(/etc/mail/sendmail.mc) and "compile" it with the m4 program it looked
> for
Hi all,
I have installed Fedora core 1 on my workstation,
with obviously comes sendmail, when i came to configure
the macro file(/etc/mail/sendmail.mc) and
"compile" it with the m4 program it looked for the sendmail-cf
package
in /usr/share, a package which apparently isn'
rg
> > >
> > > I would add declaration for the domainname
> > > Djfoo.org
> >
> > *I* would ditch sendmail for the piece of crap it is and get a normal MTA
> > which doesn't actualy require a separate personal entry in geek namespace
> > to be able to mai
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Xavier Gentoo wrote:
> On Sunday 05 January 2003 11:09, Eddie Aronovich wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > i tried adding:
> > >
> > > CMserv1.foo.org
> > > DMfoo.org
> >
> > I would add declaration for the domainname
>
On Sunday 05 January 2003 11:09, Eddie Aronovich wrote:
> >
> > i tried adding:
> >
> > CMserv1.foo.org
> > DMfoo.org
>
> I would add declaration for the domainname
> Djfoo.org
*I* would ditch sendmail for the piece of crap it is and get a normal MTA
w
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 21:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: sendmail q
>
>
>
> hi
>
> i have a server called serv1.foo.org
>
> whenever i send unqu
Quoth Oron Peled:
> On 31 Dec 2002 21:05:21 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > i tried adding:
> > CMserv1.foo.org
> > DMfoo.org
>
> Nobody these days edits sendmail.cf directly, you should use
> the m4 technique to configure sendmail (covered in Oreily'
m4 technique to configure sendmail (covered in Oreily's Bat-Book).
Than, you may send us a meaningfull sendmail.mc file of 15-20 lines
instead of making us debug ~2K lines sendmail.cf file (I won't).
Needless to say that version numbers and distro may enhance
your chances of getting
On 31 Dec 2002 21:05:21 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i tried adding:
>
> CMserv1.foo.org
> DMfoo.org
>
>
> to /etc/sendmail.cf
Nobody these days edits sendmail.cf directly, you should use
the m4 technique to configure sendmail (covered in Oreily's Bat-Book)
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 13:32, Henry Ficher wrote:
> Erez Doron wrote:
> >
> > hi
> >
> > i have a server called serv1.foo.org
> >
> > whenever i send unqualified mail from root, it is sent from
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > the problem is that though foo.org exists, serv1.foo.org does not, so my
hi
i have a server called serv1.foo.org
whenever i send unqualified mail from root, it is sent from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the problem is that though foo.org exists, serv1.foo.org does not, so my
isp returns the mail because unqualified sender domain.
i tried adding:
CMserv1.foo.org
DMfoo.org
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 13:32, Henry Ficher wrote:
> Erez Doron wrote:
> >
> > hi
> >
> > i have a server called serv1.foo.org
> >
> > whenever i send unqualified mail from root, it is sent from
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > the problem is that though foo.org exists, serv1.foo.org does not, so m
Erez Doron wrote:
>
> hi
>
> i have a server called serv1.foo.org
>
> whenever i send unqualified mail from root, it is sent from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> the problem is that though foo.org exists, serv1.foo.org does not, so my
> isp returns the mail because unqualified sender domain.
>
>
> i
hi
i have a server called serv1.foo.org
whenever i send unqualified mail from root, it is sent from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the problem is that though foo.org exists, serv1.foo.org does not, so my
isp returns the mail because unqualified sender domain.
i tried adding:
CMserv1.foo.org
DMfoo.org
Sending error: 451 4.0.0 collect: Cannot
> write ./dfg5HA"
>
> Precisely *where* is it trying to write this temp file during the sending
> process?All the (relevant) user's folders are 100% write-permitted by this
> user, and so is /var/spool/mqueue. Machine runs sendma
Hi guys, umm, seems fairly trivial, but nobody answered.. :-(
Can someone point me to any FM to RT or some such?
(other than "man sendmail", where I tried looking yet lack the time to read
top to bottom...)
Repost:
Hi all
Two mail-related questions:
1. When pine is delivering an out
Shalom,
After I had upgraded from 8.1 , I stopped to receive mail from my machine.
I had investigated this problem with Mail server guy. He had captured my mail
and found there that it use my real hostname.domain, instead the one I gave
in /etc/sendmail.cf as DM keyword.
I have tryed to use w
Greetings
I already tried to get some answers but failed, please answer if you will
I'm using Suse 7.1 with sendmail-8.11.2-4 (i tried the same with
sendmail-tls-8.11.2-13). the mail server is behind server and being NAT'ed.
i have no problem using it from the local network (192.1
Greetings
I already tried to get some answers but failed,
please answer if you will
I'm using Suse 7.1 with sendmail-8.11.2-4 (i tried
the same with sendmail-tls-8.11.2-13). the mail server is behind server and
being NAT'ed. i have no problem using it from the local network
(1
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002, Amir Tal wrote about "sendmail max recipients":
> i am trying to send a message to 1000 recipients per envalope (in 1 message)
I hope you're not entering the spamming business :(
Anyway, you might consider using some mailing list software (majordomo,
mail
hi IGLU's,
i am trying to send a message to 1000 recipients per envalope (in 1 message)
when the message is sent, sendmail bounces it back, saying its to many
recipients per message.
in /etc/sendmail.cf i changed the line to :
# maximum number of recipients per SMTP envel
are connected to them)
> > telneting to port 25 gives :
> >
> > $ telnet domain.com 25
> > Trying 1.2.3.4...
> > Connected to domain.com (1.2.3.4.)
> > Escape character is '^]'.
> > 220 domain.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.1/8.12.1; Thu, 21 Feb 2002
do you resolve names? Do you have a local DNS server?
>
> telneting to port 25 gives :
>
> $ telnet domain.com 25
> Trying 1.2.3.4...
> Connected to domain.com (1.2.3.4.)
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 domain.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.1/8.12.1; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 01:5
mail server.
there WAS a problem with my resolve.conf, but even after it was fixed, i still
get the same errors..
telneting to port 25 gives :
$ telnet domain.com 25
Trying 1.2.3.4...
Connected to domain.com (1.2.3.4.)
Escape character is '^]'.
220 domain.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.1/8.12.1; T
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002, Aviram Jenik wrote about "Re: I like a good challenge [was:
sendmail relay problem]":
> > easily. exploit one of the gazillion holes in explorer, spoof ips on ur
> > network, sniff non-encrypted or low encrypted windows passwords, send u a
> >g
Behalf Of Aviram Jenik
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'linux-il'
> Subject: Re: I like a good challenge [was: sendmail relay problem]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> > easily. exploit one of the gazillion holes in explorer, spoo
Hi,
> easily. exploit one of the gazillion holes in explorer, spoof ips on ur
> network, sniff non-encrypted or low encrypted windows passwords, send u a
>greeting card with sub7 in it, so there u r.
Ok, I love a good challenge. Lets see if you can break into the one I'm
using now.
BTW: Why did
Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>Aviram,
>keep thinking like that and I pity the organization u work for.
>
You should. Aviram is the CEO ;-)
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body,
IL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tzafrir Cohen
> Cc: 'linux-il'
> Subject: Re: [was: sendmail relay problem]
>
>
> Tzahi wrote:
>
> > well, no argument about possible security holes. but there are
> many
Tzahi wrote:
> well, no argument about possible security holes. but there are many other
> ways to exploit ur clients on windows, so i don't consider it a big of a
> deal. if u want them to be secure, tell them to stop using windows. there
> isn't a windows on the planet that can't be hacked in.
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:45 AM
> To: Tzahi Fadida
> Cc: 'linux-il'
> Subject: RE: sendmail relay problem
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailt
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
> > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:51 PM
> > To: Tzahi Fadida
> > Cc: Rabbit of Vugluskr; '
PM
> To: Tzahi Fadida
> Cc: Rabbit of Vugluskr; 'linux-il'
> Subject: RE: sendmail relay problem
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>
> > HI,
> > how many ISPs are we talking about? since u can probably make a simple
> > script vbs/per
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> HI,
> how many ISPs are we talking about? since u can probably make a simple
> script vbs/perl/whatever that uses http to send current nslookup and get
> xml/text data from your company web site which includes all known ISPS
> smtp addresses. this way, a
]
Fax (+1 Outside the US) 240-597-3213
* - * - * - * - * - *
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rabbit of Vugluskr
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:23 PM
To: 'linux-il'
Subject: RE: sendmail relay problem
--> Why won't
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Rabbit of Vugluskr wrote:
> --> Why won't they use the local smtp server? (where they connected to)
> -->
> --> an ISP sells you a dial-up link natuarally you can relay mail to the
> --> local
> --> smtp server, right?
> -->
> --> Its *faster*
>
> You're right, but they are *
--> Why won't they use the local smtp server? (where they connected to)
-->
--> an ISP sells you a dial-up link natuarally you can relay mail to the
--> local
--> smtp server, right?
-->
--> Its *faster*
You're right, but they are *salespersons*. I was solving exactly the
same problem a month a
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:39:39 +0200 (IST), Tzafrir Cohen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Why won't they use the local smtp server? (where they connected to)
> >
> > an ISP sells you a dial-up link natuarally you can relay mail to the local
> > smtp server, right?
>
> Not always. When y
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:39:39 +0200 (IST), Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why won't they use the local smtp server? (where they connected to)
>
> an ISP sells you a dial-up link natuarally you can relay mail to the local
> smtp server, right?
Not always. When you use "roaming" dial-i
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, tal amir wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, tal amir wrote:
> >
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > after 2 hours of RTFM'ing, i gave up.
> > > this is mandrake 8.1, sendmail-8.12.1-4mdk.
> > > i am having problems relaying thr
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, tal amir wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > after 2 hours of RTFM'ing, i gave up.
> > this is mandrake 8.1, sendmail-8.12.1-4mdk.
> > i am having problems relaying through that machine.
>
> > for local addresses, i just addes the c
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, tal amir wrote:
> hi,
>
> after 2 hours of RTFM'ing, i gave up.
> this is mandrake 8.1, sendmail-8.12.1-4mdk.
> i am having problems relaying through that machine.
> for local addresses, i just addes the class (192.168.141) to /etc/access,
> follo
hi,
after 2 hours of RTFM'ing, i gave up.
this is mandrake 8.1, sendmail-8.12.1-4mdk.
i am having problems relaying through that machine.
for local addresses, i just addes the class (192.168.141) to /etc/access,
followed by makemap hash access < access, so local users can now relay. wha
Hi,
You obviously know everthing from your email regarding Visual Basic but...
Port 110 is popmail
and has nothing to do with Sendmail (unless something has changed in
Sendmail in the last three years since I abandoned it and its 500 page
configuration manual, I actaully spent a whole
Suckot
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:25:02 +0300, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Create a shell that accepts not input and gives no output. Create a user
> (one user) that has no valid password (or a shared password to all your
> users - that may also work). You are already 3/4 done.
Actuall
Ehud Karni wrote
>
>The 2nd way is using SSH tunneling. It is simpler and safer, but it
>has one catch - the user must have an account (not all my mail clients
>have UNIX accounts). Forward ports 110 and 25 and it'll work like magic
>with any mail client. Nobody can steal your password (use key
>
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:57:01 +0300, Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It has been decided here that the company will allow home user to send their
> emails through the corporate mail server.
>
> Naturally - I didn't want to open a relay, so someone suggested t
Hi Hetz,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:57:01PM +0300, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> I can't find docs about this feature on sendmail. I can allow relay to IP's
> etc - but since I don't know the IP's (manager touring in the world and
> connecting) - it's a problem
Marc A. Volovic wrote:
>In addition to the other suggestion, it might be possible to tunnel into an
>INTERNAL mail server which would relay via a known IP to the primary
>mail server.
>
>The unix side of the tunnel is quite simple, the windows one I know
>nothing about.
>
Use SSH tunnel.
TeraT
Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "question regarding sendmail":
>
> The newest releases of sendmail (see sendmail.org) support a new feature
> called "SMTP AUTH" (see RFC 2554, and
> http://w
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:57:01PM +0300, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> It has been decided here that the company will allow home user to send their
> emails through the corporate mail server.
>
> Naturally - I didn't want to open a relay, so someone suggested that I setup
> the
en Hamo
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: question regarding sendmail
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "question
> regarding sendmail":
> > It has been decided here that the company will allow home
> user to send their
> > emails th
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "question regarding sendmail":
> It has been decided here that the company will allow home user to send their
> emails through the corporate mail server.
>
> Naturally - I didn't want to open a relay, so someone su
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Yes, look for the pop-before-smtp feature in new sendmails. It requires a
short perl script as well, but it works. I can ask Marshall Rapaport of
TAU if we are willing to donate it.
--Ariel
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding sendmai
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> It has been decided here that the company will allow home user to send their
> emails through the corporate mail server.
>
> Naturally - I didn't want to open a relay, so someone suggested that I setup
> the sendmail to ask fo
Hi,
I have a question regarding sendmail - maybe someone can help me with it...
It has been decided here that the company will allow home user to send their
emails through the corporate mail server.
Naturally - I didn't want to open a relay, so someone suggested that I setup
the sendma
rge mail
> server should use m4, since it's easier to control changes and add
> features using the m4 macros, than to control it when directly editing
> sendmail.cf.
I manage a sendmail server for a medium company (~200 employees).
My experience (of several years and 3 generations o
On 17 May 2001, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Umm, yeah, but the options in it are not cryptic, so you can learn to
manipulate it quickly, and I am talking about the general options, not
about rewriting the sendmail "rewrite" rules :)
--Ariel
P.S. By the way, there was this guy at TAU on
Ariel Biener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For a home user, or someone that runs a standalone sendmail
> server that serves himself (or himself and 10-20 people), there is no
> added value from using the m4 macros,
Given the incredibly convoluted syntax of sendmail.cf, I see
ges and add
features using the m4 macros, than to control it when directly editing
sendmail.cf. For a home user, or someone that runs a standalone sendmail
server that serves himself (or himself and 10-20 people), there is no
added value from using the m4 macros, not only that, learning to find how
to
On Thu, May 17, 2001, Ariel Biener wrote about "Re: RH71 and Sendmail":
> RedHat 7.1 has a misconfigured sendmail.cf. Locate a line in sendmail.cf
> that looks like this:
>
> O DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA
>
> Comment it out. Restart sendma
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Evgeny Popov wrote:
RedHat 7.1 has a misconfigured sendmail.cf. Locate a line in sendmail.cf
that looks like this:
O DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA
Comment it out. Restart sendmail.
--Ariel
> Sendmail on freshly installed RH71 (2 machines) does
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
