Re: [YBA] Sane supported document scanners with feeder in Israel

2014-03-10 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On 3/10/2014 11:06 AM, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote: Dear colleagues, I am looking for suppliers of sane-supported document scanners with page feeders in Israel and info on what works, doesn't work. TIA and Best regards, I have had several different low end HP multifunction machines, the l

[YBA] Sane supported document scanners with feeder in Israel

2014-03-10 Thread Jonathan Ben Avraham
Dear colleagues, I am looking for suppliers of sane-supported document scanners with page feeders in Israel and info on what works, doesn't work. TIA and Best regards, - yba -- 9590 8E58 D30D 1660 C349 673D B205 4FC4 B8F5 B7F9 ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}- Jonathan Ben-Av

Part of an email to Canon regarding Scanners

2009-03-26 Thread Moshe Brace using Yahoo
Some of my friends they think that Canon is behind other manufacturers in not supporting the major Linux distributions like Ubuntu, OpenSuse, Red Hat, Mandriva and Gnome. Your scanners that work excellently in Microsoft Windows and Apple Mac Computers are getting the thumbs down and lets buy

Fw: Re: Response from Canon - Scanners (KMM9629763V11238L0KM)

2009-03-18 Thread Moshe Brace using Yahoo
--- On Wed, 18/3/09, Canon Support - Scanner wrote: > From: Canon Support - Scanner > Subject: Re: Response from Canon - Scanners (KMM9629763V11238L0KM) > To: "Moshe Brace" > Date: Wednesday, 18 March, 2009, 11:21 PM > Dear Moshe Brace: > > Thank you for y

Re: Scanners

2007-03-19 Thread Peter
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Amos Shapira wrote: On 19/03/07, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: about the rest. Also why aren't brand names like 'Dork' (vs. 'Genius') and 'Minustek' (vs 'Plustek') more popular. They certainly attract attention. Who said they aren't? What about "Bug" for a place to b

Re: Scanners

2007-03-19 Thread Daniel Feiglin
I did two checks: I checked the Sane site for each item. I only paid attention to scanners with "good" or "complete" support, of which there were many. My problem was, which of them (within my nominated price/performance range) are available locally and from where. (Not many!

Re: Scanners

2007-03-19 Thread Amos Shapira
On 19/03/07, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: about the rest. Also why aren't brand names like 'Dork' (vs. 'Genius') and 'Minustek' (vs 'Plustek') more popular. They certainly attract attention. Who said they aren't? What about "Bug" for a place to buy software or a defunct "virus" computer s

Re: Scanners

2007-03-19 Thread Peter
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Daniel Feiglin wrote: > I just parted with the princely sum of NIS 312 for a Canon Lide 25. Oh, > well if it doesn't shape up, I can always put it on my wife's Windonkey. > > There are a couple of other similar supported "cheapies" like these: > Genius 1200XE - NIS 243 > Gen

Re: Scanners

2007-03-18 Thread Julian Daich
El lun, 19-03-2007 a las 09:22 +0200, Daniel Feiglin escribió: > > There are a couple of other similar supported "cheapies" like these: > Genius 1200XE - NIS 243 > Genius HR7 - NIS 389 Be careful! There were a lot of concerns regarding Genius scanners at t

Re: Scanners

2007-03-18 Thread Daniel Feiglin
Thanks for the replies! I just parted with the princely sum of NIS 312 for a Canon Lide 25. Oh, well if it doesn't shape up, I can always put it on my wife's Windonkey. There are a couple of other similar supported "cheapies" like these: Genius 1200XE - NIS 243 Genius HR7 - NIS 389 Plustek 1200 -

Re: Scanners

2007-03-18 Thread Dotan Cohen
On 18/03/07, Daniel Feiglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello folks! I am looking for a low end USB flatbed scanner <= NIS 1000, mostly as a fax front end and for scanning documents. No fancy photography is required. An examination of the Sane site, http://www.sane-project.org/ as well as a look

Re: Scanners

2007-03-18 Thread Shlomo Solomon
I've been using a Mustek 1200 UB for several years with no problems. Resolution is less than you specify (I think 600X1200), but for faxing and document scanning, it's more than enough. Even for OCR, I don't use the highest resolution. It sells for about 250 Shekels. NOTE that there is a simil

Re: Scanners

2007-03-18 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Sunday 18 March 2007, Daniel Feiglin wrote: > Hello folks! > > I am looking for a low end USB flatbed scanner <= NIS 1000, mostly as a > fax front end and for scanning documents. No fancy photography is > required. An examination of the Sane site, http://www.sane-project.org/ > as well as a look

Re: Scanners

2007-03-18 Thread Oded Arbel
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 14:12 +0200, Daniel Feiglin wrote: > Hello folks! > > I am looking for a low end USB flatbed scanner <= NIS 1000, mostly as a > fax front end and for scanning documents. No fancy photography is > required. > The sort of unit I have in mind should have resolution 1200x2400 or

Re: Scanners

2007-03-18 Thread Peter
Imho, buy an all-in-one machine from HP etc. It all works great under Linux with cups hpijs and sane. The price is about $100. You get everything in one box (even a copier). Mine is a HP-1315 and I paid even less than $100 at Office Depot at the time (with rebate + it was a gift but that's be

Scanners

2007-03-18 Thread Daniel Feiglin
Hello folks! I am looking for a low end USB flatbed scanner <= NIS 1000, mostly as a fax front end and for scanning documents. No fancy photography is required. An examination of the Sane site, http://www.sane-project.org/ as well as a look at the SUSE scanner installation list, crossed with what

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-26 Thread Gal Goldschmidt
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Installation turned out to be not as easy as I thought, I had some additional problems beside amavis poor documentation one. When CPAN/perl install creates directories it uses the umask I use (700) so no one could use my installed modules, don't forget

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-25 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi all Installation turned out to be not as easy as I thought, so I decided that it would be useful to post a follow-up On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > * As a framework for a virus scanner I saw recommendations for amavis > (http://www.amavis.org ). Any other recomendations? It s

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-24 Thread Gavrie Philipson
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > Hi all > > Due to company policy, I need to install a virus scanner on a linux mail > server. I would like to ask for recommendations. Hi Tzafrir, Just my 2 agorot: I use a GPL mail scanner named Anomy (http://mailtools.anomy.net/), together with the Kaspersky AVP vir

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-24 Thread Miki Shapiro
.. One more remark... On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote: > > modern policy-managed AV on top of an SMTP proxy. > > No, on top of Exchange. No, actually I was explicitly talking about the SMTP linux version (that fits as either a linux appliance running qmail and us or as a simple

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-24 Thread Miki Shapiro
> I strongly suggest that you don't advertise on our list. I didn't advertise, and I'm no salesperson. Tzafrir asked a question, I answered it by pointing out a product I know about, and I mentioned the exchange version to emphasize quality. I don't think that's out of line. It's the same as so

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-24 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
t; data files. > > There is a site http://www.openantivirus.org/ , but basically all of the > content there is "we want to create an open source virus scanner", > "spread the word that we want to do so" and a list of commercial > virus scanners availble for lin

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-24 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
eate an open source virus scanner", "spread the word that we want to do so" and a list of commercial virus scanners availble for linux. They also have a mailing list, which shows some signs of activities, but I haven't seen anything concrete there. -- Tzafrir Cohen mailto

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-24 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Hi, Donno about eSafe - but I used in the last 2-3 years a simple program called "amavis" which was using Mcafee anti virus DAT files in order to scan any incoming/outgoing mail - the program is very small and you only need to do is to replace the DAT files once in a while... www.amavis.org

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-24 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Miki Shapiro wrote: > Basically, it's precisely what you need (if I understood correctly) - a > modern policy-managed AV on top of an SMTP proxy. Actually, that's the kind of products I wanted to avoid: I'm quite satisfied with Postfix as an smtp server, and I don't need thi

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-23 Thread Jonathan Ben-Avraham
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Miki Shapiro wrote: > I strongly suggest you take a look at our eSafe Mail product. > I don't remember if it was released for linux already - either that or I strongly suggest that you don't advertise on our list. What's the point of posting to this list if you don't know i

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-23 Thread Miki Shapiro
I strongly suggest you take a look at our eSafe Mail product. I don't remember if it was released for linux already - either that or it's around the late beta stage). The Exchange version just took PCMag's Ed's choice this year. Basically, it's precisely what you need (if I understood correctly)

Re: virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-21 Thread Ben-Nes Michael
Hi Read bellow - Original Message - From: "Tzafrir Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Linux-IL Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:39 PM Subject: virus-scanners for mail servers > Hi all > > Due to company polic

virus-scanners for mail servers

2001-06-21 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi all Due to company policy, I need to install a virus scanner on a linux mail server. I would like to ask for recommendations. The organization generally works with Symantec (Norton), however, it seems that symantec is the only major vendor which does not have a virus scanner for linux, and th