On 6 Mar 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
> > to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
> > Networks farm. If I s
Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
> to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
> Networks farm. If I start X from the console and lock it, then a malicious
> user ca
-=O0~O0=-
"He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought -
So rested he by the Tumtum tree.
And stood awhile in thought."
[L.Carrol "Jabberwacky"]
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Christoph Bugel wrote:
> > [1] "run
> [1] "runlevel 5" is where redhat (and following it some other distros,
> like Mandrake). I believe that SuSE and debian have both runlevel 3
> for graphical login. Debian has gdm, kdm (and even xdm and wdm...) as
> init.d services.
FYI, on my slackware box it is runlevel 4. (I don't
gt; I love it when seemingly complicated problems can be solved with basic
> > UNIX concepts :)
> >
>
> Adi, the problem with your (and Shachar's) suggestion is that it will
> still cause my sound to disappear. And besides, run-level 5 was introduced
Hi Shlomi,
I don't u
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Erez Doron wrote:
> runlevel 5 does also give you virtual terminals.
>
> just press alt-ctrl-1 and you get to VT #1
> there you can login, set the display, and do whatever you like.
You can set the display, but you will only be able to connect to that
display if you are autho
nyone to enter through there.
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Adi Stav wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:04:19AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > >
> > > I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
> > >
regards
erez.
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> >
> > I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
> > to use.
>
> The most common argument against using xdm at startup ("runlevel 5" [1] is
>
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Adi Stav wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:04:19AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> >
> > I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
> > to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
> > Netw
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
> to use.
The most common argument against using xdm at startup ("runlevel 5" [1] is
that if you change the hardware or the settings the X server may f
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Adi Stav wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:04:19AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> >
> > I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
> > to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
> > Netw
ver, I noticed that using it
>my sound eventaully became non-functional for some reason. It's probably a
>bug of some sort, but I have better things to do with my time than to try
>and sort it out.
>
>3. Using Run-Level 5. That way, no virtual console are needed to invoke
>the
On Tue 2002-03-05, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
.
> I made xdm not start an X server (comment the last line in
> /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers) and have written an init.d script that runs
> 'X -query localhost' in a loop with a 'sleep 30' between them.
> That way, if X fails to start, I have 30 seconds to lo
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:04:19AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
> to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
> Networks farm. If I start X from the console and lock it, then a mal
On Tue 2002-03-05, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
> to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
> Networks farm. If I start X from the console and lock it, then a malicious
> user can s
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
Networks farm. If I start X from the console and lock it, then a malicious
user can switch to the console from which it was invoked, press Ctrl+C or
16 matches
Mail list logo
