Re: Redhat archive

2007-12-06 Thread Amos Shapira
On 07/12/2007, Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Leonid, > > You should add this also: > http://pub.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=15 Well, here is a "Duh!" from me. We have been installing CentOS like crazy for the last few months (required to support RHEL by our custome

Re: Redhat archive

2007-12-06 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Hi Leonid, You should add this also: http://pub.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=15 Many commercial software companies today issue some minimum requirements and they require either RHEL/RHES/RHAS 2,3,4 or a variant. Since Red Hat don't put these binaries for free download, the CentOS r

Redhat archive

2007-12-06 Thread Leonid Podolny
Hi, all, Hope it is not old news -- I know I risk to get a "Duh!" response. Anyway, today I accidentally ran into this site: http://archive.download.redhat.com/pub/. Well, in a sense it IS old news, of course. You know, regularly I see postings (also here, in Linux-IL) running along the lines