On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 05:09:50PM +0200, Gaven Cohen wrote:
> > Beucase gcc is broken in a few respects, and some software packages
> > require egcs.
>
> BUT -- (from the EGCS FAQ)
>
>If you have tried to build a 2.0.xx kernel for Intel machines with
>EGCS, then you are on your own. Th
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999, Gaven Cohen wrote:
That's why you have /usr/bin/gcc as 2.7.2.3 (2.8.x cannot be used for
kernel compilation either, for 2.0.x), and you have /usr/local/bin/gcc as
egcs-1.1.1, if you so wish to install it.
2.2.x kernels compile fine with egcs.
--Ariel
>
> > On Fri, 9 Apr 1
> On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Gal Aviel wrote:
>
>
> Beucase gcc is broken in a few respects, and some software packages
> require egcs.
BUT -- (from the EGCS FAQ)
If you have tried to build a 2.0.xx kernel for Intel machines with
EGCS, then you are on your own. The 2.0.xx kernels are to be bui
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Gal Aviel wrote:
Beucase gcc is broken in a few respects, and some software packages
require egcs.
--Ariel
>
> > Don't install any gcc above 2.7.2.3 Install egcs-1.1.1
>
> why ?
>
+---+
| Ariel Biener
> Don't install any gcc above 2.7.2.3 Install egcs-1.1.1
why ?
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Gal Aviel wrote:
Don't install any gcc above 2.7.2.3 Install egcs-1.1.1
--Ariel
>
> > > install the gcc-something.rpm file found in your cd (don't know
> > > the exact path. you'll find that out).
> > > I think rh 5.2 comes with gcc version 2.7.3.
> > > If you need C++ supp
> > install the gcc-something.rpm file found in your cd (don't know
> > the exact path. you'll find that out).
> > I think rh 5.2 comes with gcc version 2.7.3.
> > If you need C++ support then also install the gcc-g++something.rpm
> I installed I think both packages, I am sure I installed gcc.
>
> install the gcc-something.rpm file found in your cd (don't know
> the exact path. you'll find that out).
> I think rh 5.2 comes with gcc version 2.7.3.
> If you need C++ support then also install the gcc-g++something.rpm
I installed I think both packages, I am sure I installed gcc.
Indeed it cam
