Hi List
As im also interesting in the same question I asked what FS I should use for
postgres.
after lots of answers the thread got quite big :) and still growing.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=00c501c3970b%246900f250%240500a8c0%40canaan.co.il&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fh
> Hello, Linux People!
>
> after short consultation, i have come to this conclusion about which
> filesystem i should use on my database box (or server)
> the winner is: ex2 linux extended filesystem, yes, lassies & lads
>
> - "why not ext3/Reiser's ?"
> - "because journalling is already implemen
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003, Maxim K. wrote about "filesystem for database box":
> after short consultation, i have come to this conclusion about which
> filesystem i should use on my database box (or server)
> the winner is: ex2 linux extended filesystem, yes, lassies & lads
>
> - "why not ext3/Reiser's
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 04:50:10PM +0200, Maxim K. wrote:
> Hello, Linux People!
>
> after short consultation, i have come to this conclusion about which
> filesystem i should use on my database box (or server)
> the winner is: ex2 linux extended filesystem, yes, lassies & lads
>
> - "why not ext
I'm not such an FS expert, so please step in to correct me in case I am
wrong.
All large databases (Oracle, UDB, MSSQL) have two different access patterns
for files. One type is data access, one type is log file access.
The question is now obviously divided into two questions: Which FS should
you
On Sunday 19 October 2003 16:50, Maxim K. wrote:
> Hello, Linux People!
>
> after short consultation, i have come to this conclusion about which
> filesystem i should use on my database box (or server)
> the winner is: ex2 linux extended filesystem, yes, lassies & lads
>
> - "why not ext3/Reiser's
Maxim K. wrote:
Hello, Linux People!
after short consultation, i have come to this conclusion about which
filesystem i should use on my database box (or server)
the winner is: ex2 linux extended filesystem, yes, lassies & lads
- "why not ext3/Reiser's ?"
- "because journalling is already implemen
Can the RDBMS engine you chose handle raw partitions?
If so, how would that compare to a filesystem?
(and which RDBMS do you intend to use?)
(and what type of application is it? Online transaction
processing (a.k.a. OLTP) or batch processing a-la data
warehouse?)
Maxim K. wrote:
Hello, Linux Peopl
