Re: OT: on lasers

2002-11-25 Thread Orna Agmon
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > I accidentally flashed into someone's eye a tiny laser pointer (it is > run by two digital watch batteries, not even aaa) THOUGH A PIECE OF > WHITE PAPER, that supposedly reflects most of the light (that's why it the white material indeed reflect

Re: OT: on lasers

2002-11-25 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: There is nothing special about laser light, except coherence which should not matter. I'm not sure as for the "why", but I have personal experience as to the fact that laser light is, in fact, danagrous. I accidentally flashed into someone's eye a tiny laser pointer (it

Re: OT: on lasers

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Guy Baruch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > visible and IR-A pass thru the lens like a hot knife thru butter, > they can then cause retinal (neuronal) damage. This is AFAIK > irreperable blindness. As in blind for life. My point about UV was that UV could hurt your eye at low intensities, just bec

Re: OT: on lasers

2002-11-25 Thread Guy Baruch
the CDROMs and burners I saw are class one devices: --- _Class 1:_ Class 1 lasers are the lowest powered lasers and considered "harmless" unless tampering with the device has occurred. An example of a Class 1 laser product is