more people then in kmail:-)
what happened to the vote btw?can I readd the replay header?
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote:
| On Tuesday 28 November 2000 22:15, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
|
| > You answer your own question.
Hi, Ely!
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:20:13PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> what happened to the vote btw?can I readd the replay header?
I've posted the vote results on linux-il some time ago. You can see
them at http://www.egroups.com/surveys/iglu?id=374380 . It's 11 to 8
against having the
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> But let's face it - we'll never agree on what is the "proper" way to handle
> replies to mailing-lists...
And so we prove my original point: using vi+sendmail, I'll stay by my
opinion on the proper way to handle mailing-list -- the while "it's
the fault
Hi, Nadav!
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:38:32PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> 2. The lists mentioned on these directives have other side-effects besides
> making "L" work. The most annoying side-effect (for me) is that for every
> mailing list message, in the message list, you see the
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote about "Re: OT: To: & Cc:":
> I use sometimes pine, sometimes mutt and sometimes MH. In each case,
> I usually either reply to the person specifically, or reply to the
> list in general and the person -- unless I remember that this
&g
Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Let's start a poll ;)
>
> I've moved pine->mutt->nmh
elm -> pine -> vm -> gnus was my path, with OpenLook's mailtool
somewhere in between, relatively briefly. We are not on egroups any
more, are we? Is there a polling station on the ILUG site?
--
Ol
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote about "Re: OT: To: & Cc:":
> > BTW, my e-mailer is KMail. It has reply and reply-to-all. How many
> > people use Mutt anyway?
>
> Let's start a poll ;)
I'v
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> You sort-of missed the point - if people were using vi & sendmail to send
> replies, then indeed almost nobody will reply to both the person on the
> list (except the people who _deliberately_ want to do that, but most people
> don't).
Huh? I'm not sure
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote about "Re: OT: To: & Cc:":
> BTW, my e-mailer is KMail. It has reply and reply-to-all. How many
> people use Mutt anyway?
Let's start a poll ;)
My mailer history was using mailx (a.k.a. Mail) until about 1992, when I
switched
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote about "Re: OT: To: & Cc:":
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote:
>
> > I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
> > for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
> &g
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote:
> BTW, my e-mailer is KMail. It has reply and reply-to-all. How many
> people use Mutt anyway?
This sounds like the right time for a shameless plug: have you considered
the newly created MUA PMH? While it's only in pre-alpha, you might
want to play with
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote:
> I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
> for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
> to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ?
> In mutt you press the "L" for replying only to the li
On Tuesday 28 November 2000 22:15, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
> You answer your own question. The double reply is for folks who post
> to lists to which they do not subscribe. Think about it.
Also to people who subscribe in digest mode, and may want to have an
immediate reply when they ask a q
Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How does mutt know what is list and what is a person?
>
Good point, i have forgot that.
in .muttrc put a line start with:
lists . For example i have there:
lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc.
This will also put the name
And just when we thought the reply-to thread was dead for good ;)
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote about "Re: OT: To: & Cc:":
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote:
>
> > I been away from the list for a while and b
Guy Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
> for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
> to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ?
> In mutt you press the "L" for replying only to the li
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote:
> I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
~
> for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
> to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ?
> In mutt you p
17 matches
Mail list logo
