Quoth Evgeny Stambulchik on Wed, Jan 22, 2003:
> Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quoth Evgeny Stambulchik on Tue, Jan 21, 2003:
> > > Hmm, depends what is a "revolutionary". Either
> > >
> > > a) an author/follower/supporter of a revolutionary idea/theory
> > >
> > > or
> > >
Quoth Evgeny Stambulchik on Tue, Jan 21, 2003:
> Hmm, depends what is a "revolutionary". Either
>
> a) an author/follower/supporter of a revolutionary idea/theory
>
> or
>
> b) a person who implements an idea by "revolutionary" (read here: brute
> force, terror,...) methods
>
> I personally be
Guy Baruch wrote:
I think rms and the FSF guys are revolutionaries, while OS guys are
reformers.
Hmm, depends what is a "revolutionary". Either
a) an author/follower/supporter of a revolutionary idea/theory
or
b) a person who implements an idea by "revolutionary" (read here: brute
force, te
Vadim Vygonets wrote:
(posted to list)
> I usually release my stuff under the two-clause BSD license.
But the univeristy may have a different view
Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson
MobilEye Vision Technologies Ltd, R.M.P.E House, 10 Hartom St. Har Hotzvim
Jerusalem, 91450 Israel Tel: +972
Quoth Guy Baruch on Mon, Jan 20, 2003:
> I think rms and the FSF guys are revolutionaries, while OS guys are
> reformers.
[...]
> Thus, OS guys try to write open software not just because open standards
> are
> better technically, but because of ideology. They, however, do not want
> to throw
>
