Dear Alex (+ppl)
Oops... Made a mistake - meant
mv ./rc1.d/K49someservice ./rc1.d/S33someservice
:) Ofcourse we need a shutter to be there.
As for GUI stuff - if You intent to do something on/with Linux, it is
better to learn by doing. And GUI stuff is not doing... I do resort to GUI
tools from
> This message is not intended to many people here who do give
> great answers,
> but in hope to make this list a little more interesting.
Why would telling people to rtfm would make the list more interesting?
Anyway, this list is intended as (among others) linux suppot, linux support
means h
P.S. back to the Me thread
Guy Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aharon Schkolnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > How do I correct this ?
> >
> > Use the run-level editor in the control-panel.
>
> Like it or not (flames are welcome, private
Hi, Alexander!
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 04:42:46PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> Using RL setups is quite dangerous... It is far better to simply move the
> links... Like:
>
> mv ./rc1.d/K49someservice ./rc2.d/S33someservice
This is not a good idea, because you want to leave the K link too,
"Alexander V. Karelin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Using RL setups is quite dangerous...
Can you tell me why? I don't like those GUI tools myself, but for
someone who does not know exactly what he/she is supposed to do, it is
better to rely on the control-panel and hope it will do everything
Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aharon Schkolnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How do I correct this ?
>
> Use the run-level editor in the control-panel.
Like it or not (flames are welcome, privately), this list is getting to
sound more and more like a *windows help desk*. WTF
Dear Oleg!
Using RL setups is quite dangerous... It is far better to simply move the
links... Like:
mv ./rc1.d/K49someservice ./rc2.d/S33someservice
It has the same effect, but is cleaner and safer.
On 13 Dec 2000, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Aharon Schkolnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I
Aharon Schkolnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see that named is NOT being started at boot time.
..
> There are no S files !
>
> Any idea why this might be ?
RH assumes you don't want to run a DNS server on your box by default,
which sounds reasonable to me.
> How do I correct this ?
Us
On 13 Dec 2000, Aharon Schkolnik wrote:
>
> I just installed RedHat 7.0 from scratch.
> I included the package bind-8.2.2_P5-25.
IIRC bind-8.2.2_P7 is out and corrected some security bug. Update!
> I see that named is NOT being started at boot time.
> I see the following files:
>
> /rc.d/init
Dear Aharon!
Named has to usages... If You're using the caching nameserver, than named
shouldn't be running, and this is fine. But if You're willing to do some
real resolving on that machine, here is the list of runlevels for named:
/rc3.d/S55named
/rc4.d/S55named
/rc5.d/S55named
On 13 Dec 200
10 matches
Mail list logo
