On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Eli Marmor wrote:
> Adi Stav wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 09:40:10AM +0200, Eli Marmor wrote:
> > > 1. The statistics didn't count *users*, but boxes. Each typical UNIX
> > >has more users connected to, *in average*, than a typical Linux
> >
Adi Stav wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 09:40:10AM +0200, Eli Marmor wrote:
> > 1. The statistics didn't count *users*, but boxes. Each typical UNIX
> >has more users connected to, *in average*, than a typical Linux
> >box. It will not be a too far gamble to guess that there are more
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 09:40:10AM +0200, Eli Marmor wrote:
> 1. The statistics didn't count *users*, but boxes. Each typical UNIX
>has more users connected to, *in average*, than a typical Linux
>box. It will not be a too far gamble to guess that there are more
>non-Linux users than L
sure, with that logic we can just run windows:)
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Ira Abramov wrote:
| On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Ely Levy wrote:
|
| > |> 2. Linux is fast becoming the most popular UNIX
| > |Is already and has been for some time.
|
Well, I didn't want to interfere in this academic interesting thread,
but there is "official statistics" which may help the discussion (as
far as IDC may be considered "official"):
This statistics says that by end of 1999, 62.5% of the UNIX *servers*
were Linux (or in IDC words: 25% of the wordl'
