Re: Bank Hapoalim

2009-07-08 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:26:25PM +0300, Noam Rathaus wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have used Poalim from Ubuntu and Debian before, in Firefox 1.5, 2.0, > 3.0 and now with 3.5 without any issues. > > I can't use their Business web site as it requires an ActiveX, but > with my personal account I have n

Re: Bank Hapoalim

2009-07-08 Thread Tomer Cohen
I am actually using Bank Hapoalim with Linux without any real problems. The biggest problem is that some text is reversed sometimes (very old issue), which can be solved easily by changing page encoding. When I asked them about Linux support they said they are supporting both Windows and Mac, and

Re: Bank Hapoalim

2009-07-08 Thread Noam Rathaus
Hi guys, I have used Poalim from Ubuntu and Debian before, in Firefox 1.5, 2.0, 3.0 and now with 3.5 without any issues. I can't use their Business web site as it requires an ActiveX, but with my personal account I have no issues. On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > Weird.. >

Re: Bank Hapoalim

2009-07-08 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Weird.. I'm using Firefox 3.0.10, CentOS 5.3 and I'm surfing in my account in Bank Hapoalim for more then 10 minutes. No problem at all.. Could it be a firewall issue that ends prematurely the SSL session? Hetz 2009/7/8 Dan Bar Dov : > I just got off the phone, talking with Bank Hapoalim suppor

Re: Bank Hapoalim

2009-07-08 Thread Ori Idan
I am using Bank Hapoalim and get logged out only after 3 minutes of inactivity. -- Ori Idan 2009/7/8 Dan Bar Dov > I just got off the phone, talking with Bank Hapoalim support. > > I got a very clear message - "We do not support Linux. We support only > Windows XP and Vista.." > > Just to mak

Re: Bank Hapoalim

2009-07-08 Thread Ely Levy
Look at the email I sent to the person who tried the same with clalit, I think the same apply to hapoalim or any other big organization. Ely 2009/7/8 Dan Bar Dov : > I just got off the phone, talking with Bank Hapoalim support. > > I got a very clear message - "We do not support Linux. We support

Re: Bank HaPoalim vs. Mozilla update

2005-01-21 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:28:59PM +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: I especially mentioned Mozilla 1.8 (not yet released). Firefox 1.0 did not include the fix for bug 246700 yet. Firefox 1.1 will include the fix. With this fix, the menus will always be reversed. I know th

Re: Bank HaPoalim vs. Mozilla update

2005-01-21 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:28:59PM +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: > I especially mentioned Mozilla 1.8 (not yet released). Firefox 1.0 did > not include the fix for bug 246700 yet. Firefox 1.1 will include the > fix. With this fix, the menus will always be reversed. > > I know the reason why th

Re: Bank HaPoalim vs. Mozilla update

2005-01-21 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
Ori Idan wrote: I tried to do trasfer severl times, The field did not dissapear but the message was not endless loop, I could do the transfer without many problems. On Firefox 1.0, the messages are shown in an endless loop. Once you step into the field, you have no choice. Maybe you have some c

Re: Bank HaPoalim vs. Mozilla update

2005-01-21 Thread Ori Idan
I tried to do trasfer severl times, The field did not dissapear but the message was not endless loop, I could do the transfer without many problems. As for the menus being reversed, I use firefox and usually a simple refresh displayes them the right direction. I find Bank Hapoalim support for N

Re: Bank HaPoalim vs. Mozilla update

2005-01-20 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
Alon Altman wrote: Bank HaPoalim works fine for me in Mozilla. What problems did you notice? There are problems with certain functionalities. For example, when doing a fund transfer, if you select "Bank Hapoalim" as the target bank, the "Shem Mutav" field should disappear. On Mozilla, it doesn't.

Re: Bank HaPoalim vs. Mozilla update

2005-01-20 Thread Alon Altman
Bank HaPoalim works fine for me in Mozilla. What problems did you notice? Alon Hello, Today I've talked to their technical support again -- first to a girl named Karin, then to a guy named Asaf, reporting yet another problem with their site when using Mozilla. On the downside, they don't suppo

Re: Bank Hapoalim - was: Re: Mozilla, Internet Banking and Bank Otsar Ha-Hayal: summary

2003-11-03 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:04:29AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > It won't heart me to learn a trick or two. And neither to spell. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g

Re: Bank Hapoalim - was: Re: Mozilla, Internet Banking and Bank Otsar Ha-Hayal: summary

2003-11-03 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
I hereby request. It won't heart me to learn a trick or two. On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 09:18:16PM +0200, Baruch Even wrote: > For anyone interested I've modified Dan's script to extract the data to > CSV files, I've also made use of HTML Table extraction to hopefully > make the script a bit more rob

Re: Bank Hapoalim - was: Re: Mozilla, Internet Banking and Bank Otsar Ha-Hayal: summary

2003-10-30 Thread Baruch Even
* Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031030 16:42]: [Accessing bank-hapoalim website] > Oh, and you may find my own *DANGEROUS* perl script interesting. It tries to > summarize a few pages off the poalim site. As written inside, it is GPLed (see > exception!) and comes with absolutely no warranty.

Re: Bank Hapoalim - was: Re: Mozilla, Internet Banking and Bank Otsar Ha-Hayal: summary

2003-10-30 Thread John Rabkin
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:36:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:21:46PM -0500, Guy Baruch wrote: > > Several people mentioned that Otsar Ha-Hayal is subsidiary of Hapoalim, > > and the URL > > is the same. > > Speaking of Bank Hapoalim, last night I tried to enter

Re: Bank Hapoalim - was: Re: Mozilla, Internet Banking and Bank Otsar Ha-Hayal: summary

2003-10-30 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:36:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:21:46PM -0500, Guy Baruch wrote: > > Several people mentioned that Otsar Ha-Hayal is subsidiary of Hapoalim, > > and the URL > > is the same. > > Speaking of Bank Hapoalim, last night I tried to enter

Re: Bank HaPoalim and Mozilla

2002-12-27 Thread Zvi Har'El
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 01:56:39 +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote about "Bank HaPoalim and Mozilla": > Speaking of banks and Mozilla bugs: Bank HaPoalim's online account > site displays its menus reversed due to a Mozilla bug: > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165609 > > (yes, this is a