Hi All,
All of you consider Active directory as an LDAP server, this is not
truth, AD is a kerberos environment that LDAP served as a backend (the
first AD server is authentication server, TGS server, KDC, schema
master, and LDAP server).
AFAIK for that kind of heterogeneous environmen
-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ohad Levy
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 3:22 AM
> To: ILUG
> Subject: Re: [YBA] NIS vs LDAP
>
> Hi,
>
> just my couple of cents:
>
> AD and Linux authentication works quite well, that means for
> authentication only, you c
Hi,
just my couple of cents:
AD and Linux authentication works quite well, that means for authentication
only, you can use kerborse to authenitcate users that you have on your AD.
however, its quite important to know, that user id mapping will be done via
winbind (or maybe a mapping file), and
On Tuesday, 25 בDecember 2007 21:54, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> There is one thing that everyone in this discussion seem to have missed
> so far, and that is that AD *is* LDAP.
>
> Ariel Biener wrote:
> > Well, I wouldn't chose any of the above in the way it is described. I
> > believe that MS AD is
There is one thing that everyone in this discussion seem to have missed
so far, and that is that AD *is* LDAP.
Ariel Biener wrote:
Well, I wouldn't chose any of the above in the way it is described. I believe
that MS AD is the best tool to use for Windows environment, LDAP is the
best tool f
On Tuesday, 25 בDecember 2007 17:13, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
>
> However be aware that except for Windows, NFS uses *NIX user numbers
> for access control. If your user name to user number mapping is
> not consistent across all your systems you can have security
> problems.
Indeed, consistenc
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Ariel Biener wrote:
> Well, I wouldn't chose any of the above in the way it is described. I believe
> that MS AD is the best tool to use for Windows environment, LDAP is the
> best tool for a Linux environment, and NIS is the best tool in that it is alot
>
On Tuesday, 25 בDecember 2007 09:34, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
> Hi Linux-IL members,
> I am considering setting up a heterogenous work environment with about
> 100 high-end Linux work stations, 40 MS Windows, and 10 Mac's. The
> underlying common authentication system will likely be LDAP. Would
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 11:04 +0200, Noam Meltzer wrote:
> Speaking of LDAP management:
> I have had the best experience with this tool:
> http://muclm.sourceforge.net/
>
> Highly configurable, plug-in system, user-friendly, and installation
> takes 5 seconds.
Not as feature complete, but I use a
Speaking of LDAP management:
I have had the best experience with this tool:
http://muclm.sourceforge.net/
Highly configurable, plug-in system, user-friendly, and installation takes 5
seconds.
On Dec 25, 2007 10:35 AM, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:34 +0200, J
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:34 +0200, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
> I am considering setting up a heterogenous work environment with about
> 100 high-end Linux work stations, 40 MS Windows, and 10 Mac's. The
> underlying common authentication system will likely be LDAP. Would NIS or
> Active Direc
Hi,
1. Regarding NIS vs. LDAP:
The way I see things, NIS is obsolete in 2007 (and much before) for the
following reasons: NIS is not secure: everything goes plain text over the
network; You can not prohibit "standard" users to see other users password
hash (ie. you can't make the shadow map privat
12 matches
Mail list logo
