Great news. Now if they could only make it more lightweight...
You don't feel it in Linux, but having distributed Qt with a
commercial Windows app, It's quite a pain to have your app weighing in
at over 7M for just the GUI module.
That's not a lot in today's world, but it's still heavy. don't know
Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the post of Sat, 18 Sep:
Googling for "qtconfig settings fonts" etc. haven't turned up anything.
What am I doing wrong?
first, you are not using menuconfig.
Very witty :)
second, have you ran the KDE control panel to set the default fonts?
this ma
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 11:41:55AM +0300, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the post of Sat, 18 Sep:
> > Googling for "qtconfig settings fonts" etc. haven't turned up anything.
> >
> > What am I doing wrong?
>
> first, you are not using menuconfig.
OT: how do gconfig and xconf
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the post of Sat, 18 Sep:
> Googling for "qtconfig settings fonts" etc. haven't turned up anything.
>
> What am I doing wrong?
first, you are not using menuconfig.
second, have you ran the KDE control panel to set the default fonts?
this may do something for qtconf
Josh Roden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We're in the process of changing over to Red Hat 9 from Red Hat 7.2.
> So far we have found one problem with Red Hat 9. The problem is that
> Qt runs a lot slower on Red Hat 9. Any advice on the subject would
> be appreciated.
I can only confirm with an e
On Monday 03 November 2003 14:44, Oleg Kobets wrote:
> Hetz,
>
> What's the difference between native rh9 qt and these that you provided ?
> And why native rh9 qt is slower ?
If I recall correctly, there were some issues that I have seen before with the
RH 9 QT RPMS - I don't remember exactly the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: Qt runs much slower on rh9.
> Yup,
>
> As usual, when it comes to redhat and QT/KDE - shit hit the fans...
>
> Use these RPMS instead:
> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/9/RPMS.stable/
>
>
Red Hat 7.2 has QT 2.x, and 9 has QT 3.x. The main difference
between QT 2 and 3 is Unicode support, which can slow things down
a bit. Can you give some numbers or so then?
behdad
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Josh Roden wrote:
> We're in the process of changing over to Red Hat 9 from Red Hat 7.2.
> S
Yup,
As usual, when it comes to redhat and QT/KDE - shit hit the fans...
Use these RPMS instead:
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/9/RPMS.stable/
Hetz
On Monday 03 November 2003 13:20, Josh Roden wrote:
> We're in the process of changing over to Red Hat 9 from Red Hat 7.2.
> So far we ha
It really depends on the format of the graph itself. That is, it really
depends on what you're trying to accomplish.
For example, if you're trying to solve something numerically (which
is very common) you can just write the data values of the numerical
computation to a file or to stdout and then us
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, kfir lavi wrote:
> hi,
> i need to construct a testing program that will show a graph, to test an
> algorithms.
> now i'm working on windows.
> what library should i use?
> mfc is for windows and its ugly, also its not portable.
> qt - i don't know it, will it answer my questi
Title: RE: qt
Sorry..
ftp://ftp.trolltech.com/qt/non-commercial/QtWin230-NonCommercial.exe
and all documentation on http://www.trolltech.com
-Original Message-
From: kfir lavi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 8:37 AM
To: Boulgakov Andrei
Cc: [EMAIL
Boulgakov Andrei wrote:
Yes, QT will. For Windows you have "light" QT 2.0.3 for free.
-Original Message-
From: kfir lavi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qt
hi,
i need to construct a testing program that will show a graph
Title: RE: qt
Yes, QT will. For Windows you have "light" QT 2.0.3 for free.
-Original Message-
From: kfir lavi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qt
hi,
i need to construct a testing program that will sh
Yes, but it was never for free to anyone. Only sold commercially..
Now it's available as free if a person's university signs with them with the
QT University, and now you can get also a 30 days evaluation for free..
Hetz
On Monday 19 March 2001 18:32, Oren Held wrote:
> Hi Hetz
>
> Maybe this
Hi Hetz
Maybe this program is new, but trolltech had QT for windows for kinda long
time..
Cya,
Oren.
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Hetz Ben Hemo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just wanted to let you know: Trolltech (the company who makes the QT
> Libraries) are having a new program for universities who are wil
Hi,
On Friday 02 March 2001 01:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> in #kde. they told me that's OK to sell closed sourced KDE programs. But
> they did not mention a thing about QT. So KDE is free because QT is not?
> - diego
Diego, you're mixing 2 things:
QT have 2 licenses - GPL and QPL
The G
ent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: QT/KDE legal stuff
> No no, it doesn't go like this...
>
> If you're writing a commercial program with QT - then you'll have to buy
the
> commercial QT and work with it to create your application. There are 2
> versions
how come?
you would if you for example staticlly link with them??
that what LGPL was trying to prevant no?
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
| So what?
|
| As long as you don't modify the source code of KDE itself - then you
So what?
As long as you don't modify the source code of KDE itself - then you don't have
to give sources..
Ely Levy wrote:
>
> and I always thought KDE libs are GNU licenced..
>
> Ely Levy
> System group
> Hebrew University
> Jerusalem Israel
>
--
Hetz Ben Hamo
Hardware Research dept.
Adu
and I always thought KDE libs are GNU licenced..
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
| Almost..
|
| Yes, you'll need the commercial QT - but you can write a proprietary KDE
| applications (look atmy previous email) as long a
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: QT/KDE legal stuff":
> This is just plain untrue.
>
> You can make a KDE compliant application and sell it, without any problem,
> as long as you also distribute the source (and not necesarily for free -
> it's lega
Almost..
Yes, you'll need the commercial QT - but you can write a proprietary KDE
applications (look at my previous email) as long as you don't modify or
touch the KDE sources themselves...
Hetz
On Wednesday 28 February 2001 22:45, Oded Arbel wrote:
> This is just plain untrue.
>
> You can
No no, it doesn't go like this...
If you're writing a commercial program with QT - then you'll have to buy the
commercial QT and work with it to create your application. There are 2
versions - one for Windows and one for most unices (Linux/BSD/Solaris etc..)
Now - regarding KDE - no one forces
This is just plain untrue.
You can make a KDE compliant application and sell it, without any problem,
as long as you also distribute the source (and not necesarily for free -
it's legal to make the source available only to the people who purchased
your software). AFAIK if you don't want to distri
xpect?
Hetz
- Original Message -
From: Noam Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Hetz B.H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: QT
> thanks. but unfortunatly i can't find the link to 2.2.4 trolltech has an
> hard to navigate web-page. c
Hi Noam,
Before you go to download QT 2.2.3, you should download QT 2.2.4 as it got
some bug fixes there..
Now, regarding the versions of the QT:
The QT X11 Free edition is just the QT that we all know - including the
docs, and QT Designer - so you can use KDE and other QT based applicaions
wit
Udi Finkelstein wrote:
> Has anybody checked (even the beta versions) if QT 2.0 really supports right
> to left hebrew?
Yes, I have checked and it certainly does not have any Hebrew support
yet. I actually pulled over the sources in order to figure out how
difficult it would be to implement the p
28 matches
Mail list logo
