On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 12:09 +0200, Aaron wrote:
> I am guessing that this is on purpose?
> You did catch that I was trying to run as root.
> I sometimes find that some tabs or addons to mozilla only will install
> if I (gasp) run mozilla as root.
he tabs addons or whatever get installed typicall
Thanks to everyone on the list for all their answers with my no display
question.
You guy are great, not only did I get a quick fix but a tutorial in X.
I infact didn't understand how X works at all, so my simple question got
me some great answers.
Thanks again,
Aaron
==
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004, Aaron wrote about "Re: no display":
I often need to fix a readonly or system file and out of habit use gvim.
Or I want to run Synaptic which I think needs me to be su.
In Fedora, Redhat or Mandrake I never had this problem.
This
ir
Cohen on Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:22:11 +0200)
Organization: Mivtach-Simon Insurance agencies
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m.co.il> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <200401261022=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Emacs 21.3.1 rmail (send-msg 1.108)
MIME-Versio
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004, Aaron wrote about "Re: no display":
> I often need to fix a readonly or system file and out of habit use gvim.
> Or I want to run Synaptic which I think needs me to be su.
> In Fedora, Redhat or Mandrake I never had this problem.
>
> This only happ
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 12:09:17PM +0200, Aaron wrote:
> Well thanks,
>
> I often need to fix a readonly or system file and out of habit use gvim.
> Or I want to run Synaptic which I think needs me to be su.
> In Fedora, Redhat or Mandrake I never had this problem.
>
> This only happens in Debia
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 12:01:04PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> You may be surprised that root can't do something that an ordinary user
> can, but X-Windows authentication actually works differently from the
> ordinary Unix permission model, because it is aimed to work across hosts,
> not just on
responses.
this pretty much solves this for me
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote about "Re: no display":
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:07:01PM +0200, Aaron wrote:
theone:/home/aamehl# xev
Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
Xl
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote about "Re: no display":
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:07:01PM +0200, Aaron wrote:
>
> > theone:/home/aamehl# xev
> > Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
> > Xlib: No protocol specified
>
>
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Lior Kesos wrote:
> on the prompt with the user that activated the X server enter -
> user>xhost +
>
This is the dangerous way of using xhost: it allowes everyone to use your
display. Better specify xhost +machine_from_which_I_execute
Orna.
=
on the prompt with the user that activated the X server enter -
user>xhost +
regards
Lior.
On Sun, 2004-01-25 at 13:07 +0200, Aaron wrote:
> Hi all,
> I remember having this problem years ago and that it was a simple fix
> but I just can't remember how.
> I try starting an X program and I get t
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:07:01PM +0200, Aaron wrote:
> theone:/home/aamehl# xev
> Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
> Xlib: No protocol specified
what does 'xhost' say? does 'xhost +localhost' or 'xhost +' help? be
aware that allowing X access (which is what xhost does) has security
Your hostname should be in the /etc/hosts file
Samuel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Aaron
Sent: Sun 25-Jan-04 1:07 PM
To: Linux-IL mailing list
Cc:
Subject: no display
Hi all,
13 matches
Mail list logo
