Ariel Biener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If they charged you for the fact you made them upgrade their link, you
> wouldn't be able to pay.
> Israeli customers except near US prices, for way
> more investment on the side of the ISP. Personally, I get the feeling you
> don't really know this asp
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> Anyhow, at peak times, we reached about 130 HTTP processes (less than
> the 150 MaxClients). The HTTP server's transfer
> (http://www.iglu.org.il/stats/mrtg/traffic_http.html) went up to around
> 40kb/s.
>
> In sum, the linux_report.html was downloa
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 08:59:52PM +0300, guy keren wrote:
> the server is hosted on the understanding that its main feature is to
> serve the israeli community of linux users. not the world-wide community
> of linux users. so just don't abuse this if you don't wish for the server
> to get kicked
network, routers
> and servers are up to their job, and monitor it 24x7 for possible
> problems. Anything less is incompetence on their side.
>
> Just my 2c,
> Haim.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Haim Gelfenbeyn wrote:
> 3.Now I host with different provider (in the US), and there were times
> when my site got 8GB/day traffic (dynamic and static content). What thay
> say is "our servers reliability is our problem, not yours. We will bill
> you accordingly, but our ser
On 14 May 2001, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > not everybody places a file on their server and then posts a message to
> > slashdot. :0
>
> You mean, not everybody who creates a web page advertises is on /.?
> Granted, but so many of them hope that someone will post the link there.
this was NOt an
On 14 May 2001, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> I don't buy this argument. They can limit the traffic by contract, and
> offer to pay more for extras, just as Haim said.
Paying for extra is divided into two counts:
1). access
2). used bandwidth
If they charged you for the fact you made them upgrade t
Ariel Biener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If, in order to supply you with your needs, it needs to add 5Mbit of
> capacity to it's planned capacity, it costs a FORTUNE.
I don't buy this argument. They can limit the traffic by contract, and
offer to pay more for extras, just as Haim said.
> Thus
>
> On Mon, 14 May 2001, Haim Gelfenbeyn wrote:
>
> > So I think this is Actcom's job to ensure that their
> network, routers
> > and servers are up to their job, and monitor it 24x7 for possible
> > problems. Anything less is incompetence on their side.
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I think you are mistake
ay,May 14, 2001 6:57 PM
> > To: guy keren
> > Cc: Chen Shapira; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: iglu on slashdot
> >
> >
> > guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > this wasn't a normal slashdot post. it was an intended test.
> &
IL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Oleg Goldshmidt
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 6:57 PM
> To: guy keren
> Cc: Chen Shapira; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: iglu on slashdot
>
>
> guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > this wasn't a normal slashdot post. it wa
guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this wasn't a normal slashdot post. it was an intended test.
Even so, the resulting hits were normal for /. There was no traffic
generated on purpose.
> not everybody places a file on their server and then posts a message to
> slashdot. :0
You mean, not
actually there is actcom and I think many other isp would remove a page
that takes too much bandwidth or take extra money after certain amount of
infomation
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On 14 May 2001, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
| Chen Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
ople, you could
> have DOSed their network.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Omer Musaev
> > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 4:14 PM
> > To: 'Hetz Ben Hamo'; Oren Held; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: iglu on slashdot
> >
> >
>
'; Oren Held; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: iglu on slashdot
>
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 04:46:18PM +0200, Chen Shapira wrote:
> > And next time, do coordinate such activity with the actcom
> people, you could
> > have DOSed their network.
>
> Yes, I ad
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 04:46:18PM +0200, Chen Shapira wrote:
> And next time, do coordinate such activity with the actcom people, you could
> have DOSed their network.
Yes, I admit I decided to take a risk :)
Anyhow, at peak times, we reached about 130 HTTP processes (less than
the 150 MaxClien
On 14 May 2001, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Chen Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > And next time, do coordinate such activity with the actcom people, you could
> > have DOSed their network.
>
> Question #1: Don't we distinguish between DOS and Slashdot effect?
this wasn't a normal slashdot
Chen Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And next time, do coordinate such activity with the actcom people, you could
> have DOSed their network.
Question #1: Don't we distinguish between DOS and Slashdot effect?
Question #2: Is everybody who posts a link on /. or another
DOS-capable service/
And next time, do coordinate such activity with the actcom people, you could
have DOSed their network.
> -Original Message-
> From: Omer Musaev
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 4:14 PM
> To: 'Hetz Ben Hamo'; Oren Held; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
> -Original Message-
> From: Hetz Ben Hamo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:21 PM
> To: Oren Held; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: iglu on slashdot
>
>
> Yeah,
>
> Ilya and I have decided to see what will happend if we'll
Yeah,
Ilya and I have decided to see what will happend if we'll stress test the
Compaq server - with a slashdot attack.
So, in co-ordination with the slashdot authors on IRC, Ilya on his side
converting a word document to HTML and PDF - and me in the middle of this -
we decided that - yes -
21 matches
Mail list logo
