> -Original Message-
> From: Gil Freund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
> Arik Baratz wrote:
> [snip]
> > In short: Why doesn't smbumount have a 'force' option? It's
> > SUID root anyways, so it can in theory run umount as root.
> I don't know, but I guess such an option would actually b
Arik Baratz wrote:
[snip]
In short: Why doesn't smbumount have a 'force' option? It's SUID root anyways, so it can in theory run umount as root.
I don't know, but I guess such an option would actually be very
dangerous. If you mount an smb share under one login context, use it
under another log
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 02:08, Guy Teverovsky wrote:
[snip]
> Actually, in properly configured AD both W2K and Linux will be denied
> access. Search the net for "Enforce password history". The default on
> W2K is to remember 1 old password.
>
It's the hour. This part is a total nonsense. Please, di
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 20:51, Gil Freund wrote:
> Arik Baratz wrote:
>
> >>1. Do you get a valid responce when do:
> >>nmblookup
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> Hostname resolution seems ok.
>
> >>Also check the following:
> >>
> >>1. Has the share (mount) been unused for over a week? (Windows cycles
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Gil Freund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
> More to the point:
> You cannot change credentials on a monted CIFS share. Even in
> Windows,
> if you changed your password while logged in, you will find
> that network
> shares will act in an unpredicted m
Arik Baratz wrote:
1. Do you get a valid responce when do:
nmblookup
[snip]
Hostname resolution seems ok.
Also check the following:
1. Has the share (mount) been unused for over a week? (Windows cycles
host credentials once a week)
It's been mounted for over a week, but used during this pe
> 1. Do you get a valid responce when do:
> nmblookup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] arikb]$ nmblookup -A arikb.vidius.co.il
Looking up status of 10.0.3.2
ARIKB <00> - M
VIDIUS-IL <00> - M
ARIKB <03> - M
ARIKB$ <03> -
Arik Baratz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] arikb]$ stat mnt
stat: cannot stat `mnt': Input/output error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] arikb]$ smbumount mnt
Could not umount mnt: Device or resource busy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] arikb]$
Forgot to mention: /var/log/messages | grep smb contains:
Jul 27 01:03:07 daisy kern
> -Original Message-
> From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sunday 27 July 2003 22:37, Arik Baratz wrote:
[snip]
> > Did anyone encounter this before?
> Yes, can't tell you why or how to fix it, but if you can't
> unmount the share,
> you can kill -9 the smbmount process.
Ac
On Sunday 27 July 2003 22:37, Arik Baratz wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> When I mount an SMB share over the network from a 2000 machine, after a few
> days the mount point becomes unreachable, to the point that stat () on the
> mount point fails. Furthermore it cannot be unmounted.
>
> Did anyone encount
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] arikb]$ stat mnt
> stat: cannot stat `mnt': Input/output error
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] arikb]$ smbumount mnt
> Could not umount mnt: Device or resource busy
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] arikb]$
Forgot to mention: /var/log/messages | grep smb contains:
Jul 27 01:03:07 daisy kernel: smb_tr
11 matches
Mail list logo
