On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 21:27, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:16:01PM +0200, Ariel Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > It makes no difference at all. What purpose would it supposedly serve?
> >
> > Freing up memory,
>
> Until recently
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:16:01PM +0200, Ariel Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> >
> > It makes no difference at all. What purpose would it supposedly serve?
>
> Freing up memory,
Until recently, unloading module didn't actually free up the memory,
IIRC. In any ca
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> It makes no difference at all. What purpose would it supposedly serve?
Freing up memory, sometimes some modules have bugs and can be exploited in
ways beyond us, and also, software tends to interract.
--Ariel
> --
> Muli Ben-Yehuda
> http://www.mul
Tal, Shachar wrote:
Did you try checking for bad blocks using dd if=/dev/hda9 of=/dev/null ?
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
I did now.
To me, the "bad sector" theory doesn't add up. There are no errors
reported from the IDE driver, dd does not encounter problems, there is
no data corruption tha
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:37:42AM +0200, Ez-Aton wrote:
And about the modules - is it not wise removing unused modules?
It makes no difference at all. What purpose would it supposedly serve?
It makes some sense not to load them to begin with. Not enough sense to
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:37:42AM +0200, Ez-Aton wrote:
> And about the modules - is it not wise removing unused modules?
It makes no difference at all. What purpose would it supposedly serve?
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
"the nucleus of linux oscilla
Did you try checking for bad blocks using dd if=/dev/hda9 of=/dev/null ?
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 12:25 AM
> To: Ez-Aton
> Cc: Linux-IL
> Subject: Re:
Reiser does not handle BS quite well. The idea is that bad blocks on the
journal (and this changes, so you can't actually track it as part of a single
proccess or specific file, but where the journal has just been written)
Since the journal changes locations, as far as I know, the reason might be
Ez-Aton wrote:
What is 03:09 device? Check your /proc/bus/devices and/or your disk section in
/proc.
If I'm not mistaken - that should be /dev/hda9, which is where /home is
mounted from (and where all the processes that failed had open files).
Do you get to hear weird noises out of your com
What is 03:09 device? Check your /proc/bus/devices and/or your disk section in
/proc.
Do you get to hear weird noises out of your computer during such a case?
Do dmesg | grep 03 and check what 03:09 refers to. It might be bad blocks (my
guess) or it might be some PCI device malefunctioning.
My
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 08:48, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First - a disclaimer. My kernel is tainted. I'm asking people here
> whether anyone knows anything about it, before going through the process
> of untainting my kernel (nvidia, vmware).
>
> I'm not sure what the conditions are, y
11 matches
Mail list logo
