RE: Putting Windows Boot Loader instead of LILO

1999-12-05 Thread El-al, Netta
this happened to my brother because he asked for lilo to be installed on the linux partition (the default?) instead of on the mbr. so i went into linux with the boot diskette that he made during the install and edited /etc/lilo.conf: i changed /dev/hda1 to /dev/hda at the top. and then i ran "lilo

Re: Putting Windows Boot Loader instead of LILO

1999-12-03 Thread Ben-Nes Michael
I think sys c: (from bbot disk) Shlomi Fish wrote: > I just upgraded my system from RedHat 6.0 to RedHat 6.1. After the upgrade > was complete I realized that the upgrader replaced the Windows Boot loader > with LILO. Not only that, but it only displays the letters LI and gets > stuck. > > I nor

Re: Putting Windows Boot Loader instead of LILO

1999-12-02 Thread Moran Cohen
Shlomi Fish wrote: > > I normally use loadlin to boot my Linux partition so I'm interested in > having LILO removed. Does anybody know how I can re-install Windows 98's > Boot Loader? > > The way I see it - I have another option and it is using a LILO disk. I > have a Windows partition on /dev/hd

Re: Putting Windows Boot Loader instead of LILO

1999-12-02 Thread Ira Abramov
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Shlomi Fish wrote: > I just upgraded my system from RedHat 6.0 to RedHat 6.1. After the upgrade > was complete I realized that the upgrader replaced the Windows Boot loader > with LILO. Not only that, but it only displays the letters LI and gets > stuck. boot from a rescue di

Re: Putting Windows Boot Loader instead of LILO

1999-12-02 Thread Leonid Igolnik - LiM
|I just upgraded my system from RedHat 6.0 to RedHat 6.1. After the upgrade |was complete I realized that the upgrader replaced the Windows Boot loader |with LILO. Not only that, but it only displays the letters LI and gets |stuck. Go to your BIOS and change the settings from AutoDetect to LBA (it