On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 05:20:31PM +0307, Baruch Even wrote:
> Note: they may wonder how comes you expect to have free time to
> actually do any such projects.
That's only a problem with startups, and (in my experience) startups
that do not understand how development works. "this should take 4
we
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:18:06PM +0200, Martin Polley wrote:
> The problem is that signing certain NDAs means that your employer owns
> all the IP coming out of your brain in the time you are employed by
> them. Therefore, anything you contribute to any open-source project
> (during this time) is
Quoting Martin Polley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problem is that signing certain NDAs means that your employer owns
> all the IP coming out of your brain in the time you are employed by
> them. Therefore, anything you contribute to any open-source project
> (during this time) is also subject to su
* Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021114 17:08]:
> But my suggestion: do the "NDA refusal" only after you are guaranteed the
> job and given a contract to sign. If you go with the "I will not sign an NDA"
> to the first interview or put it in the CV, they can easily ignore you
> without even cons
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002, Martin Polley wrote about "RE: OT, NDA (was: Looking for a Job :
Shlomi Fish' Bio)":
> The problem is that signing certain NDAs means that your employer owns
> all the IP coming out of your brain in the time you are employed by
> them. Therefore, an
The problem is that signing certain NDAs means that your employer owns
all the IP coming out of your brain in the time you are employed by
them. Therefore, anything you contribute to any open-source project
(during this time) is also subject to such an agreement...
Martin Polley
Technical Communic
