Re: Linux cluster on HPPA (PA-RISC) architecture

2003-08-14 Thread Guy Teverovsky
Computational. The main purpose is to run a pilot and get a proof of concept of integrating linux clusters in current architecture, so the low performance of such a cluster is not an issue. High availability might be considered too (hey! if the developers can't benefit of it, I can always find a

Re: Linux cluster on HPPA (PA-RISC) architecture

2003-08-14 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Guy Teverovsky wrote: Greetings all, I did some hardware inventory in the warehouse debris at work and found some 6-7 HP workstations (J200, J210, J280). I would like to bring some life to those and free their enslaved by HP-UX souls. The big question is whether there is any chance running some a

Re: Linux cluster on HPPA (PA-RISC) architecture

2003-08-14 Thread Orna Agmon
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > I guess it's either PVM (http://www.csm.ornl.gov/pvm/pvm_home.html) or > one of those weird packages from SourceForge clustering section that I'm > never sure what thwey do, like Condor: http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor// For Alpha (by Digital-Compaq-HP)

RE: Linux cluster on HPPA (PA-RISC) architecture

2003-08-07 Thread Guy Teverovsky
> * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * > > WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Orna Agmon > > Sent: Wednesday, August 0

RE: Linux cluster on HPPA (PA-RISC) architecture

2003-08-07 Thread Tzahi Fadida
TED] Behalf Of Orna Agmon > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:42 PM > To: Gilad Ben-Yossef > Cc: Guy Teverovsky; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Linux cluster on HPPA (PA-RISC) architecture > > > On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > > > I guess it's either P

Re: Linux cluster on HPPA (PA-RISC) architecture

2003-08-06 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Guy Teverovsky wrote: Computational. The main purpose is to run a pilot and get a proof of concept of integrating linux clusters in current architecture, so the low performance of such a cluster is not an issue. High availability might be considered too (hey! if the developers can't benefit of it,