On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Chen Shapira wrote:
> > I think it was Gal Yahas who wrote once that "real Programers do
> > cat < /dev/audio > a.out, pick up the microphone and whistle"
>
> and we change the old saying to:
> "an infinite number of rockbands given infinite time can produce Linux"?
Well, y
> I think it was Gal Yahas who wrote once that "real Programers do
> cat < /dev/audio > a.out, pick up the microphone and whistle"
and we change the old saying to:
"an infinite number of rockbands given infinite time can produce Linux"?
--
Chen Shapira
We will honor a contract and stand by a f
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> With cat vs. vi, and Burrows-Wheeler vs. Lempel-Ziv in there for good
> measure. And, and of course, with Zadka advocating Pytohn, 'cause that's
> what Zadkas do best. (Winnie the Pooh reference, anyone?)
ZAPTA - Zadka Advocates Python To All :-)
And Ome
Are there on the Linux all the Win/Unix equal products available, such
as BEA WebLogic Servers, Java Web Server/NetscapeEnterprise Server,
etc. If yes, have these prods. the same list of features as their Win/Unix
versions? What does not available?
Thanks.
--
Evgeny Gesin
Java 2 Certified Program
>From my experience JBuilder for WinNT is able to plug-in any
jdks up to 1.2 version and I found it as the best Java IDE.
On Linux\Unix platform there is Java version of JBuilder, which
is really slow, as you pointed out, and I prefer the old (AWT)
Java WorkShop 2.0, and avoid of either Emacs, VI
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Omer Mussaev wrote:
> ACK. vi vs emacs is too old to be true...
>
> However, the war is vi vs. gvim
With cat vs. vi, and Burrows-Wheeler vs. Lempel-Ziv in there for good
measure. And, and of course, with Zadka advocating Pytohn, 'cause that's
what Zadkas do best. (Winnie th
Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Ira Abramov wrote:
>
> > I'll stick to good ol' mouse-insensitive
> > terminal vim.
>
> Real men use "cat > source.c", and edit with sed/grep/awk, or use the
> interactive Python interpreter to make changes.
> Of course, they put
> "from my_editor import *
> Real men use "cat > source.c", and edit with sed/grep/awk, or use the
> interactive Python interpreter to make changes.
zcat is much faster.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the mess
Pavel Bibergal wrote:
> people!!!
> STOP!!
> cool down..
> don't start this war vi VS. emacs again!
ACK. vi vs emacs is too old to be true...
However, the war is vi vs. gvim
--
Omer Mussaev051-308-214 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
systems programmer, Mercury Interactive/RND/Conduct/core
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Ira Abramov wrote:
> I'll stick to good ol' mouse-insensitive
> terminal vim.
Real men use "cat > source.c", and edit with sed/grep/awk, or use the
interactive Python interpreter to make changes.
Of course, they put
"from my_editor import *" in their $PYTHONSTARTUP, and use c
Ira Abramov wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Omer Mussaev wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Emacs JDE is much better if you have regressed to vi.
> > > What can be better?? :-)
> >
> > gvim.
>
> just inject me with gooey honey straight down one of my major
> arteries... gvim is for wimps, real men use the keyboar
people!!!
STOP!!
cool down..
don't start this war vi VS. emacs again!
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Omer Mussaev wrote:
> >
> > Emacs JDE is much better if you have regressed to vi.
> > What can be better?? :-)
>
> gvim.
just inject me with gooey honey straight down one of my major
arteries... gvim is for wimps, real men use the keyboard. the only thing
I use the mouse is
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > yeah, but it sucks, it's slow, it's not JDK 1.1 compatible, you can't
> > cut and paste with the X clipboard... I'm back in VI :-)
> >
>
> Emacs JDE is much better if you have regressed to vi.
> You have syntax highlighting + the annoying key seque
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ira Abramov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Pavel Bibergal wrote:
> >
> > > If u want to use the same standart IDE for linux and windows.. u should
> > > get borlands Java Builder..
> > > It is free..
> >
> > yeah, but it sucks, it's slow, it's not JDK 1.1 compatible,
Ira Abramov wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Pavel Bibergal wrote:
>
> > If u want to use the same standart IDE for linux and windows.. u should
> > get borlands Java Builder..
> > It is free..
>
> yeah, but it sucks, it's slow, it's not JDK 1.1 compatible, you can't
> cut and paste with the X clipbo
Ira Abramov wrote:
> Hi Evgeny. you can't post to this list if you are not subscribed.
>
> > Does anyone use Linux for Java development?
> > Why do you find it more comfortable for that than WinNT?
First: cost.
Second: toolkits.
Applications developed with java tend to have relation to network
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Pavel Bibergal wrote:
> If u want to use the same standart IDE for linux and windows.. u should
> get borlands Java Builder..
> It is free..
yeah, but it sucks, it's slow, it's not JDK 1.1 compatible, you can't
cut and paste with the X clipboard... I'm back in VI :-)
--
Ir
If u want to use the same standart IDE for linux and windows.. u should
get borlands Java Builder..
It is free..
Ira Abramov wrote:
> Hi Evgeny. you can't post to this list if you are not subscribed.
>
> > Does anyone use Linux for Java development?
> > Why do you find it more comfortable for th
19 matches
Mail list logo
