Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
so... is that legal or not...?
I think this issue was the very reason Perl is distributed with GPL or
with Artistic license.
I am sorry I don't have link right now to the Artistic license.
Gabor
http://www.perl.org.il/YAPC/2003/
==
ps using GNU Classpath (http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/)
could make GPLing Java code easier.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ira Abramov
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Raft of Circumcised Penguins
Subject: Re: JAVA and o
Quoting Alexander Maryanovsky, from the post of Mon, 30 Dec:
> It's not that clear cut with Java. In fact, the GPL is rather flawed
> when it comes to interpreted languages, or any languages that allow
> reflection, because in the former case, there is no linking (at least
> not in the original sen
The question to be answered is whether or not the closed programs is a
derivative of the GPLed one. The GPL states that a program that is
linked against a GPLed program is considered a derivative program, so
according to the GPL you only get legal rights to use the GPLed program
if you offer the
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 01:01, Ira Abramov wrote:
> >
> > The question to be answered is whether or not the closed programs is a
> > derivative of the GPLed one. The GPL states that a program that is
> > linked against a GPLed program is considered a derivative program, so
> > according to the GPL y
Quoting Gilad Ben-Yossef, from the post of Mon, 30 Dec:
>
> The question to be answered is whether or not the closed programs is a
> derivative of the GPLed one. The GPL states that a program that is
> linked against a GPLed program is considered a derivative program, so
> according to the GPL you
