> heh... is this the right place to mention VI stands for
> Visual Interface
> (of ex)? :-)
no kidding? and here I was thinking that VI is visual intercal...
everyone who can write a telnet client in intercal, stand up!
Chen Shapira
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Chen Shapira wrote:
> > no. you'll find it extremely hard to convert a VC++
> > programmer into using
> > linux.
>
> agreed. the otherway around too.
> after years of programming with vi, I find it difficult using visual
> anything.
heh... is this the right place to menti
> and seemingly-commercialized? i'd prefer to leave the LUG's
> state as is,
> for internal meetings. commercialization is vaiable only for
> bringing up
> events that cannot be set up in a completely vulentary
> environment (e.g. a
> linux booth at some expo...).
I don't suggest commercial
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, guy keren wrote:
>
> btw, as for celebrities - this is fun once or twice, but eventually, it
> tends to be repeteteive, and boring. not to mention one great disadvantage
> - they carry out the talk in english, and this makes it less fluent then
> it could be, when done in h
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Chen Shapira wrote:
> few points:
>
> 1. Note how well orginized and proffesional our window collegues are.
and seemingly-commercialized? i'd prefer to leave the LUG's state as is,
for internal meetings. commercialization is vaiable only for bringing up
events that cannot
