kmail2 is stable, it does not crash, if this is what you mean.
kamil3 was stable at beta2, which I used for a month or two. I am now using
kmail2, waiting for kde3 final, which supports hebrew perfectly. I used to
swap mails with ms-only duds, which did not see any problem.
I am just waiting for
it looks very much like Citrix in Seemless window.
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 02:34, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> umm, if I were a person who would of thinking buying Ximian connector - I
> would have wait 2 more days...
>
> Why? umm, take a look at this screenshot:
> http://witch.dyndns.org/stuff/coming.
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 02:14, Dvir Volk wrote:
> which reminds me: does Evolution work properly with hebrew under GTK
> 2.0?
GTK+ 2.0 is not backwards compatible with 1.2. Evolution will need to be
ported to GTK+ 2.0.
=
To unsubs
> I haven't tried working with kmail under kde3.0 yet, but i found mozilla
> to be the best Hebrew/HTML mail client for linux so far.
> the hebrew support in 0.9.8 is excellent for most needs.
> it is also far more stable than the verisons of kmail and evolution i've
> tried.
> how is the new kmai
This idea is of course a nice to have feature. However the possibility
of achieving this is highly dependent on the Mail clients' software
design architecure, not all let you just plug in new protocols
On ג', 2002-03-26 at 15:59, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <[EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Dvir Volk wrote:
> > Mozilla is still problematic with respect to Hebrew, though, I believe
> > (some small issues: like: how do you set the main direction
> > of a message
> > to be RTL)
>
> I haven't tried working with kmail under kde3.0 yet, but i found mozilla
> to be the
>(as iff MS wants you to use an exchange server instead of the
standard).
hmmm... i can believe that :)
> Mozilla is still problematic with respect to Hebrew, though, I believe
> (some small issues: like: how do you set the main direction
> of a message
> to be RTL)
I haven't tried working wit
On 26 Mar 2002, Erez Doron wrote:
> I agree
>
> every one of us like a diffrent mail user agent
> and there are some applictaions that support calendaring
>
> what i do not like is that the only server i know that let
> me share calanders etc .. is Ms Exchange
>
> I do not care if each and every
On 26 Mar 2002, Oleg Kobets wrote:
> Guys, you are way off the thread I started. All I wanted is a
> alternative to Exchange in Linux. Not client, SERVER.
>
> In a meanwhile I found that there is a 600& bynari.net server that
> completely replaces exchange without the need to replace MS Outlook,
Guys, you are way off the thread I started. All I wanted is a
alternative to Exchange in Linux. Not client, SERVER.
In a meanwhile I found that there is a 600& bynari.net server that
completely replaces exchange without the need to replace MS Outlook, it
works in MAPI (MS protocol). Also I think
I agree
every one of us like a diffrent mail user agent
and there are some applictaions that support calendaring
what i do not like is that the only server i know that let
me share calanders etc .. is Ms Exchange
I do not care if each and every app will work with Ms Exchange, evan
free ones. I
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 14:27, Shai Bentin wrote:
> BTW, What is your favorite MUA?
>
Mine? Kmail on kde 3.0 of course - specially the features like
send-before-receive which can works very well with mail servers that don't
allow relay..
The screenshot I've shawn is Outlook 2000 from my Offic
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shai Bentin asked Oleg:
> >
> > BTW, What is your favorite MUA?
Check the headers:
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
But that's not the point - see below.
>
> Isn't it obvious?
>
> "mail"
That's
Shai Bentin asked Oleg:
>
> BTW, What is your favorite MUA?
Isn't it obvious?
"mail"
:-)
Geoff
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Bloomberg L.P., BFM (Israel) 2 hours ahead of London, 7 hours ahead of New York.
Tel: 972-(0)3-754-1158 Fax 972-(0)3-754-1236 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
BTW, What is your favorite MUA?
On ג', 2002-03-26 at 10:16, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > More details - in wednsday..
>
> That's a nice afikoman, sure, but I have a very general question in
> relation to all of that (Connector, whatever this screensho
Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> More details - in wednsday..
That's a nice afikoman, sure, but I have a very general question in
relation to all of that (Connector, whatever this screenshot shows,
etc).
Yes, I would like interoperability with all the unwashed masses that
use the blo
umm, if I were a person who would of thinking buying Ximian connector - I
would have wait 2 more days...
Why? umm, take a look at this screenshot:
http://witch.dyndns.org/stuff/coming.png
And no, it's not win4lin, not vmware, and not Lindows, and it costs less then
Ximian connector.
More de
What do you know, Ximian announced today the release of Connector, which
will allow you to connect to an Excahnge server using Evolution.
Which is good news for people with paranoid corporate sysadmins that
don't allow IMAP access to their Exchange servers (that would be me) :)
Sadly, it's rath
On 24 Mar 2002, Oleg Kobets wrote:
> Him all!
>
> I have a question. Is there any open source (free) software that will
> give me "Public Folders" function in Linux ?
The IMAP protocol generally suppoerts the notion of "public folders" and
also of "shared folders" (actually I'm using terms of UW
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002, Oleg Kobets wrote about "Exchange in Linux":
> I have a question. Is there any open source (free) software that will
> give me "Public Folders" function in Linux ?
You can connect with the IMAP protocol to the exchange server (if properly
configured) and read those public f
> Him all!
She all!
> I have a question. Is there any open source (free) software that will
> give me "Public Folders" function in Linux ?
I never used Exchange (thank god for small favours) but many IMAP servers support the
notion of public folders. I think Courier-IMAP is one of them.
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
