Of
> Uri Even-Chen
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 7:37 PM
> To: Ariel Biener
> Cc: linux-il
> Subject: Re: Configuring BIND - DNS server
>
> OK, I understand. Thanks. I'm not going to change the current
> configuration right away, but I took this issue into account
OK, I understand. Thanks. I'm not going to change the current
configuration right away, but I took this issue into account.
Currently it's technically too complicated and time consuming to run 2
separate BIND servers on the same machine, and I only have one IP
address. But if there will be an i
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Ariel Biener wrote:
And of course no one said that you need to buy more hardware, just
run two BIND servers on the same machine, each bound to its own
IP address...
I think that it is impolite to translate like that for geeks. They
always know what is meant and only ask
On Sunday 11 March 2007 12:13, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> Of course I want to learn, but I don't understand what's wrong with
> the current configuration. And also, many technical people forget
> that hardware costs money. 2 servers would cost me double; 3 servers
> would cost me 3 times etc. I'm n
On 3/10/07, Ariel Biener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 15:50, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> I don't see any reason to split. I only have one server machine, and
> I'm using the same DNS server for both purposes. It works. Of
> course, if you want you can use my DNS server as yo
On Saturday 10 March 2007 15:50, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> I don't see any reason to split. I only have one server machine, and
> I'm using the same DNS server for both purposes. It works. Of
> course, if you want you can use my DNS server as your own resolver,
> but I don't care. By the way, Netv
On 3/8/07, Ariel Biener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The right (well, I am not Paul Vixie but, this is the general consensus) is to
split the DNS setup into the following:
1. Authoritative, a set of name servers that only respond to queries of data
sets that are local to them. Used for you and oth
On Thursday 08 March 2007 14:27, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> On 3/8/07, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What are you using a name server for ?
> > * If you are using a name server to provide DNS services to your own
> > local network, then you better reference the main root servers.
>
> No.
>
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
I'm running a DNS server using BIND, and I downloaded the list of the
root servers from [http://www.internic.net/zones/named.root]. I found
out that there is one root server, F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET, which is
located in Tel-Aviv [http://www.root-servers.org/]. Actually, there
ar
On 3/8/07, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What are you using a name server for ?
* If you are using a name server to provide DNS services to your own
local network, then you better reference the main root servers.
No.
* If you are using a name server to cache DNS queries for local
proc
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 04:52 +0200, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> I'm running a DNS server using BIND ... I want to know how do I configure
> BIND to try
> F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET first, or is that done automatically?
>
> By the way, maybe using my ISP (Netvision)'s DNS servers is better? I
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
