Eli Marmor wrote:
> Bad.
> Very bad.
> Contrary to Bezeq, who makes its big money out of frame-relay and
> Sifranet, CATV doesn't dacrifice any source of income by giving high
> upstream bandwidth.
Yes, it does. The cable network is designed for DOWNSTREAM, not upstream.
The upstream bandwidth or
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about "Re: Cable modem after 2 weeks":
> If you say so. Conventionally, though, it's kilobit per second. I am
> not aware of any standard that mandates that, but MB is megabytes, Mb
> is megabits, etc. E.g.
>
> http://ww
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
>
> Eli Marmor wrote:
> >
> > Upstream!
> > Upstream!
> > You forgot to report the upstream bandwidth!
>
> Based upon ftp'ing a some files I had available:
> (note that the connection I used is capable of 26 kbytes per second max)
>
> Small file:
>
> 619.56 kB 10
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> Of Oleg Goldshmidt
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 1:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cable modem after 2 weeks
>
>
> Amir
Amir Tal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 50kbps = 50 kilobyte per second. ... Ok ? :)
If you say so. Conventionally, though, it's kilobit per second. I am
not aware of any standard that mandates that, but MB is megabytes, Mb
is megabits, etc. E.g.
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/M/MB.html
--
Ol
> -Original Message-
> From: Sagi Bashari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 2:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Eli Marmor'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cable modem after 2 weeks
>
>
> From: "A
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoffrey S. Mendelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 1:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'Sagi Bashari'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Eli Marmor';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cable m
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> Of Oleg Goldshmidt
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 1:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Eli Marmor'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cable modem
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Are you sure you are not mixing units here? Geoff seems to quote
> everything in bytes (and I assume kB stands for kilobyte, as usual).
> 11 kB/s id _more_ than 50kb/s if kb stands for kilobits.
I have to. By the time I actually get the data the only unit of throughput
i
Amir Tal wrote:
> of us have more bandwidth then
> What AZTV are selling now ;)
> So it is true. Trust me, I have a 4 pc's LAN running on that connection
> for a long time, so I know what it can\cant do.
During the experiment, it would not make sense to limit your bandwitdh.
Since there were onl
From: "Amir Tal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I don't think that it is. AZTV offer (easy+) include 96kbps
> > upstream (12kB/s
> > max)
>
> Well, I am using cables for 6 months (I am from the experiment) and some
> of us have more bandwidth then
> What AZTV are selling now ;)
> So it is true. Trust m
Amir Tal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 619.56 kB 10.96 kB/s
>
> That is WAY to slow man...i get more then 50kb upstream in similar
> locations.
Are you sure you are not mixing units here? Geoff seems to quote
everything in bytes (and I assume kB stands for kilobyte, as usual).
11 kB/s id _
> -Original Message-
> From: Sagi Bashari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 2:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Eli Marmor'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cable modem after 2 weeks
>
>
> From: "
From: "Amir Tal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Based upon ftp'ing a some files I had available:
> > (note that the connection I used is capable of 26 kbytes per
> > second max)
> >
> > Small file:
> >
> > 619.56 kB 10.96 kB/s
>
> That is WAY to slow man...i get more then 50kb upstream in similar
> loc
> I wrote:
>
> 619.56 kB 10.96 kB/s
Amir Tal wrote:
> That is WAY to slow man...i get more then 50kb upstream in similar
> locations.
> What modem to you have ?
> The IBM one ?
No I have the RCA (Thompson) modem.
Artutzi Zahav claimed 64k bits per second max.
Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mende
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Geoffrey
> S. Mendelson
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 12:36 PM
> To: Eli Marmor
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cable modem after 2 weeks
>
>
> El
Eli Marmor wrote:
>
> Upstream!
> Upstream!
> You forgot to report the upstream bandwidth!
Based upon ftp'ing a some files I had available:
(note that the connection I used is capable of 26 kbytes per second max)
Small file:
619.56 kB 10.96 kB/s
Large file performance was about the same.
Upstream!
Upstream!
You forgot to report the upstream bandwidth!
;-)
--
Eli Marmor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTO, Founder
Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies Ltd.
__
Tel.: +972-9-766-1020 8 Yad-Harutzim St.
Fax.: +972-9-766-1314
18 matches
Mail list logo
