Hi!
I believe you are misunderstadning the point of the original article. What
he wanted to know if version control merges, can be done to MS-Office
documents.
I.e: suppose we have a tree:
A -> B
And a branch:
A -> C
Can we combine B and C into a merged document B+C. While Subversion can
mer
Shlomi Fish wrote:
> I have had some experience with Subversion, and I can highly recommend it.
> (caveat emptor: I did not stress test it). Subversion supports binary
> files much better than CVS, but I don't know if it is possible to merge MS
> Office documents using common version control opera
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Eli Marmor wrote:
> Recently, subversion has become a serious competitor for CVS. It is
> Open Source, based on the DAV protocol, implemented on Apache with the
> Open Source mod_dav protocol, and together with the DeltaV extensions
> it offers a full networked versioning cont
A minor correction:
I wrote:
> Recently, subversion has become a serious competitor for CVS. It is
> Open Source, based on the DAV protocol, implemented on Apache with the
> Open Source mod_dav protocol, and together with the DeltaV extensions
"module", of course, a
Recently, subversion has become a serious competitor for CVS. It is
Open Source, based on the DAV protocol, implemented on Apache with the
Open Source mod_dav protocol, and together with the DeltaV extensions
it offers a full networked versioning control environment.
I wouldn't mention it, if the
Ilya Konstantinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, the file would inflate as a result of storing the entire
> history so if you intend to pass it to someone else, IIRC there's an
> option to save a copy without the history.
I don't know of any, I'll have to check. And if there is such an
option
Caveat emptor: I don't have experience in saving Word docs in CVS,
just with a) Word docs, and b) CVS.
"Tzahi Fadida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what you suggest takes out all the point of using the cvs. for that,
> i don't need cvs. i could just save them on a joint share, and
> similar thin
On Friday 28 March 2003 14:06, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> the problem is, we use windows with office word 2000 to create the
> documents and i just can't find a satisfactory file format that will keep,
> for example, the tabbed numberings, and other simple formats.
> of course the first thing that comes
Tzahi Fadida wrote on 2003-03-28:
> what you suggest takes out all the point of using the cvs. for that, i don't need
> cvs. i could just
> save them on a joint share, and similar things like that.
> What i am seeking is using the power of cvs, to use, for example wincvs to update
> parts of the
hi Fadida
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CVS for documents
>
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>
> > the problem is, we use windows with office word 2000 to create the documents
> > and i just can't find a satisfactory file format that will ke
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> the problem is, we use windows with office word 2000 to create the documents
> and i just can't find a satisfactory file format that will keep, for example,
> the tabbed numberings, and other simple formats.
if _all_ of you use office 2000 - then just s
11 matches
Mail list logo
