No personal experience but iSCSI is a block level protocol so this should
depend on the filesystem you are running. Theoretically it is the same as
running any filesystem on a regular scsi device.
Yonah
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Yonah Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The disadvantage of AOE is that it is Ethernet, Layer II, and not routable.
> iSCSI is an IP protocol and so you can use it even over a WAN.
>
> Although AOE sounds like a good idea, it is not very supported. Only one
> compa
The disadvantage of AOE is that it is Ethernet, Layer II, and not routable.
iSCSI is an IP protocol and so you can use it even over a WAN.
Although AOE sounds like a good idea, it is not very supported. Only one
company I've ever heard of makes commercial AOE devices. iSCSI on the other
hand is s
ronys wrote:
Hi,
For a LAN, AOE seems to have less overhead, so performance *might* be better
(assuming the network is the bottleneck).
iSCSI is much more popular in the industry, though.
My experience is with iSCSI - feel free to ask me if you need more info on
setting up iSCSI initiators & t
Hi,
For a LAN, AOE seems to have less overhead, so performance *might* be better
(assuming the network is the bottleneck).
iSCSI is much more popular in the industry, though.
My experience is with iSCSI - feel free to ask me if you need more info on
setting up iSCSI initiators & targets.
